Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 02 Aug 2010 (Monday) 15:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How conspicious is a 400/300 for non-pro use?

 
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
10,206 posts
Likes: 1413
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Aug 04, 2010 14:33 |  #61

bobbyz wrote in post #10661515 (external link)
Even third world countries don't have stupid laws like that.

Its not so much a law but police here do question you about what you are doing mostly under anti terrorism .
i gues they dont know about Google earth.

if a school has a play say at xmass if one person objects to there kid being photographed by othere parents then only the school can take shots oh and no vidio either.

my friend takes his kids to after school football i wanted to go with him and take some shots last week .
But No not allowed even he carnt do that.
Great isnt it.
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smvss14
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: North West UK
     
Aug 04, 2010 14:55 as a reply to  @ GyRob's post |  #62

My wife is a primary school teacher here in the UK, and she is always nervous if I attempt to take a photo of anything that may involve children in the background, especially if I am using a long lens. It's a very sad situation.

Neil.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Aug 04, 2010 17:25 |  #63

bobbyz wrote in post #10661515 (external link)
Even third world countries don't have stupid laws like that.

Somalia has no laws at all.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave ­ kadolph
"Fix the cigarette lighter"
Avatar
6,140 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Mar 2007
Location: West Michigan--166.33 miles to the Cook County courthouse
     
Aug 04, 2010 17:42 |  #64

JeffreyG wrote in post #10662720 (external link)
Somalia has no laws at all.

As much as I tend to **** about the current politically correct state of American society it could be worse.

And yes--I shoot T Ball with a 300 2.8;)


Middle age is when you can finally afford the things that a young man could truly enjoy.
Tools of the trade

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MJF830
Member
Avatar
94 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: TX
     
Aug 04, 2010 20:46 |  #65

Just tell them that is why you have the "BIG" lens, so their kid doesn't ruin your pictures! It's not your fault they are bad parents and don't take pictures of their own kids ;)


Mike
Canon 7D / Canon Xti / Canon Rebel X 35mm /Canon 70-200mm f/4 L / Canon 28-135mm is usm / Canon 50mm 1.8 mk ii / Canon 18-55mm / Canon 35-80 mm / Kodak 80-210mm EF mount / 70-300 P.O.S. / Vivtar 383 / Tamarac Aero 75 /

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jsboutin
Member
181 posts
Joined Mar 2008
     
Aug 04, 2010 20:52 as a reply to  @ MJF830's post |  #66

I'm pretty sure that if one of your kids is on the fields, and you're just photographing him, or his actions, you're not doing anything wrong.

Seriously, why would you care? If a police officer shows up, you show him your pics. Or ask if photographing kids on a public soccer/whatever field is illegal, which I'm pretty sure it isn't.


EOS Digital Rebel XT, EF 17-40 F/4 L and 70-200 f/4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pilsburypie
Goldmember
Avatar
1,128 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2009
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Aug 06, 2010 03:43 |  #67

Hmmmm, very interested in this being in the UK with a 3 year old daughter. I have taken my video camera and SLR to my little girls Gym class and nothing has been mentioned. Have seen "no photo" signs up in swimming pools though which I can understand.

She'll be starting pre school soon and I fully intend documenting all her sports days and school plays. What is the law on this? Is it just a local agreement like you cant take pictures in certain places? Is the law to protect children from peadophiles? Can't everyone see you are a parent mainly shooting your offspring? Seems to me a peado could do a lot better for his sick perversion than taking pics of kids playing football or in a school play dressed up as Mary or Joseph!


Mark
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anthony27
Member
Avatar
99 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Swindon, UK
     
Aug 06, 2010 06:09 |  #68

The law in the UK is not too bad... With some exceptions, as long are you are in a public place you can take pictures for personal use. Exceptions include taking pictures of military installations or policemen.

The problem is that the police and other members of the public are not au fait with this....

Lots of good info here: here (external link)

As far as taking pictures of children on school premises goes, since it's not technically a public place (even though us taxpayers probably paid for it) then the school is entitled to prohibit photography. It's not a specific photography law that stops you taking pictures of children, but the school could probably have you done for trespassing for example.

By no means am I an expert on UK law, but this is my understanding, from what I've read...


1DX2, 1D4, 1DsII, A few nice lenses.
Complete Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_xyz
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: SE UK
     
Aug 06, 2010 11:45 |  #69

anthony27 wrote in post #10671858 (external link)
The law in the UK is not too bad... With some exceptions, as long are you are in a public place you can take pictures for personal use. Exceptions include taking pictures of military installations or policemen.


Almost - there's no specific law against photographing the police in the UK. Also there's no distinction between personal or commercial use of photography in a public area. In a private are that's different, and is obviously down to the owners of the area as to what's allowed.

The problem is that the police and other members of the public are not au fait with this....

Lots of good info here: here (external link)

As far as taking pictures of children on school premises goes, since it's not technically a public place (even though us taxpayers probably paid for it) then the school is entitled to prohibit photography. It's not a specific photography law that stops you taking pictures of children, but the school could probably have you done for trespassing for example.

The school (or more likely the local education authority) will set what's allowed / disallowed on a school's premises. For instance my son's primary school allowed any photography of school events.

The easiest thing is to clarify with the school / local education authority.

Dave




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neil_r
Cream of the Proverbial Crop
Landscape and Cityscape Photographer 2006
Avatar
18,065 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jan 2003
Location: The middle of the UK
     
Aug 06, 2010 11:49 |  #70

GyRob wrote in post #10661071 (external link)
the problem here in the UK is that things like pools playing fields or school football is Private land you carnt even photograph your own kid in some cases just in case you get someones kid in the background .
if you own a slr and large lens your guilty and have to prove your inocents befor you even take a shot .
Rob.

Rob, I have only had experience with kids Equestrian events and Rugby and for most events or tournaments there is a place to register with details about yourself and they give you a sticker or a chit.

Far from being asked not to take pictures of peoples kids I am often asked to take their pictures.


Neil - © NHR Photography
Commercial Site (external link) - Video Site (external link) - Blog - (external link)Gear List There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. ~ Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

11,466 views & 0 likes for this thread, 52 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
How conspicious is a 400/300 for non-pro use?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1125 guests, 126 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.