You've been McScrewed.
10megapixel "I'm a little slow" 3,872 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Surrounded by Corn and Rednecks in Indiana More info |
Apollo.11 Goldmember 1,845 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Dallas, TX More info | Aug 04, 2010 00:04 | #47 10megapixel wrote in post #10658240 You've been McScrewed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop" 57,560 posts Likes: 178 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Aug 04, 2010 00:19 | #48 Now that's McFunny... Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sfaust Goldmember 2,306 posts Likes: 10 Joined Nov 2006 More info | Aug 04, 2010 00:23 | #49 mjryan67 wrote in post #10658148 Nope not if the school gave them the images, I just registered the kids yesterday and one of the documents you sign is a photo release, so that any photos the school wishes to use for promotion they can. Now the twist here is that the situation could be that by uploading to the schools website you may have granted the school a wide set of rights to the images, more than likely they could not sell them but if they gave them you might not be entitled to anything. Correct. It really depends on what the photographer assigned to the school. If its a broad based assignment, then the photographer is out of luck. Generally that's not the case, but it could be here. An IP attorney would be able to make that determination pretty quickly after reading the documents or release involved. Stephen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mjryan67 Member 181 posts Likes: 54 Joined May 2003 Location: St. George, Utah More info | Aug 04, 2010 00:45 | #50 sfaust wrote in post #10658389 Correct. It really depends on what the photographer assigned to the school. If its a broad based assignment, then the photographer is out of luck. Generally that's not the case, but it could be here. An IP attorney would be able to make that determination pretty quickly after reading the documents or release involved. Also, did the school contact the local McDonalds and ask if they could put up the posters for the schools promotion. Or is the local franchisee the one that put them up for their own promotion. Another very important distinction. Exactly correct there is more info needed but I am guessing that from what I see the McD's franchises do around here is they do promote the schools and have lots of pics up there from the team pics to anything that they have won etc. so I think it would be reasonable that the local McD's may have asked the school but under the guise of promoting the school. Now the McD's is getting some good out of the deal so you may be able to prove some benefit to them but again I think the negative of being a sourpuss and the negative publicity or talk could hurt senior business or the permission to shoot the sports.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gatorboy Goldmember 2,483 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: Bel Air, MD More info | Aug 04, 2010 12:41 | #51 Denis Seguin wrote in post #10658237 what about the athlete, model release? Model release not needed. There is no product advertised on the poster. Just like when McDonald's sponsors little league teams and their photos are in the store, a model release is not needed from those kids either. Dave Hoffmann
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 04, 2010 12:52 | #52 model release not needed. Photo is being displayed, not used to promote the product.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Viva-photography Goldmember 1,447 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Washington, DC More info | Aug 04, 2010 13:54 | #53 Get some money! Whoo!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jacuff Goldmember 2,581 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Searcy, AR More info | Aug 04, 2010 14:49 | #54 BreitlingFan wrote in post #10658171 If that's true, it would be a completely separate issue, and one which has nothing to do with the photographer, and everything to do with the person who stole the photos. Yeah, but it could also make the photographer very unpopular. Sort of like a bar owner going on television after a brawl involving players on the university's football team and saying they were at the bar on VIP status. Viva-photography wrote in post #10661528 edit: wait. So would it be considered illegal for him to register the images, and then demand money? Sure, it'd be a low hit, but with that kind of money you wouldn't need to worry about selling images for a good while. Nope, it would not be illegal at all. In fact he could demand money without even registering them. However, if he registers them within 90 days of infringement, he can sue for statutory damages instead of just actual damages. (Actual damages in this case looks to be practically nothing, so not worth most lawyers' time.) Statutory damages could easily fund a 400/2.8, 300/2.8, and a 1DIV. Gear, Feedback (eBay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tomd Cream of the Crop 13,282 posts Likes: 31 Joined Jan 2007 Location: I live next to my neighbor More info | Aug 04, 2010 14:53 | #55 ^^^ I thought for the additional penalty the images had to be registered within 90 days of publication not the infringement. For example if these were posted in the HS web site last November, the 90 days are past. I'm not sure of this, perhaps someone will chime in. .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LBaldwin Goldmember 4,490 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2006 Location: San Jose,CA More info | Aug 04, 2010 14:57 | #56 Contact Carolyn E. Wright, at www.photoattorney.com Les Baldwin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 04, 2010 15:13 | #57 If I were arbiter I would not accept promotion of the school as a defense. Why? Because EVERYTHING McDonald's does is with themselves and their profit in mind as their #1 concern. Even sponsorship of schools and other programs is done with intent to get their name out there and promote their good name and bring more people into their stores so they can sell more product. It's a great gesture, don't get me wrong, but it's #2 at best. Website: Iowa Landscape Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 04, 2010 15:14 | #58 tomd wrote in post #10657333 Free Big Mac's for life Maybe the OP can get Jackie Chiles for his attorney. Website: Iowa Landscape Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Viva-photography Goldmember 1,447 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Washington, DC More info | Aug 04, 2010 16:03 | #59 Get some cash! I agree though. Contact a lawyer if you want to sue.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Viva-photography Goldmember 1,447 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Washington, DC More info | Aug 04, 2010 16:04 | #60 Nope, it would not be illegal at all. In fact he could demand money without even registering them. However, if he registers them within 90 days of infringement, he can sue for statutory damages instead of just actual damages. whoops. not according to what i found. When a photo is not registered with the U.S. Copyright Office prior to the infringement (or within three months of the first publication of the photo), a copyright owner may recover only “actual damages” for the infringement (pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504 (b)), instead of statutory damages.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is NekoZ8 840 guests, 108 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||