Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 06 Aug 2010 (Friday) 09:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What filter is best for waterfalls and creeks?

 
SimpleJack
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
846 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Washington
     
Aug 07, 2010 09:25 |  #16

argyle wrote in post #10677634 (external link)
I carry several...a 3, 6, and 10, plus some very good polarizers. I also use a Singh-Ray Vari-N-Duo, which is variable ND from 2-8 stops, plus a built-in polarizer for another 2 stops. I'm not trying to change your mind on the 10, just that I wouldn't recommend it as the sole filter. But near the coast in bright daylight, and what you're trying to achieve, the 10-stop (and probably a stacked polarizer to kill glare) would be a benefit under those conditions.

I understand
Well, there is only one way to find out is to try it out and see what I can do with it
Vari-N-Duo is a pretty cool filter, would like to just get one of those, but I noticed it was a little out of my price range, haha

I would probably get a 3 next and see what I need from there. Not really sure since DSLR is all new to me.

You mentioned Polarizers. You have more then one? there is different types that I might want to link into?


Canon PowerShot S100

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCAsan
Goldmember
Avatar
3,918 posts
Likes: 88
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Atlanta
     
Aug 07, 2010 16:57 as a reply to  @ post 10677634 |  #17

would suggest variable ND....not purchasing a stack of dedicated ones. You can get commerical ones from Singray or Fader. You can also create your own by putting a linear polarizer in front of the CPL. You need to spin the linear filter without spinning the CPL. You can find sites that tell you have to stack and use them. There are also sites that will tell you how to take apart a CPL to make a VND. I would never try that with a nice expensive CPL like a BW Kaisemann unit.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Aug 08, 2010 06:10 |  #18

SimpleJack wrote in post #10677689 (external link)
I understand
Well, there is only one way to find out is to try it out and see what I can do with it
Vari-N-Duo is a pretty cool filter, would like to just get one of those, but I noticed it was a little out of my price range, haha

I would probably get a 3 next and see what I need from there. Not really sure since DSLR is all new to me.

You mentioned Polarizers. You have more then one? there is different types that I might want to link into?

My base polarizer is a B+W Kaesemann MRC. I also have a few from Singh-Ray that I use in certain circumstances, plus a Lee 4x4 that I use with GNDs and a holder. Since you're starting out, I'd recommend that you just pick up a good, high-quality base polarizer such as the B+W Kaesemann (the S-R's are more of a specialty polarizer) and work from there. But whatever you do, stay away from the $10 polarizers on ebay...

The Vari-N-Duo does seem expensive, but when you factor in the cost of multiple high-quality ND filters and a polarizer (77mm size) the S-R actually prices out less than the price of the combined separate filters. In practical use, it does have some issues that could crop up, depending on the focal length chosen and the ND strength. I use the thin mount version...vignettes up to about 24-25mm on a FF camera (the filter is 14mm thick). Also, if you go beyond the max ND density (8-stops), an x-pattern will appear. At 35mm and longer, the x-pattern is no longer an issue. If you can work around the focal length limitations, its a great filter with no color cast and the IQ is simply outstanding. TBH, stacking 2 ND filters will be thinner than the S-R. As long as you are using quality filters when stacking, you shouldn't have any IQ issues to worry about from the filters (just need to be mindful of vignetting).

Last but not least...do yourself a favor and avoid the DIY variable ND filters and welding glass...strange color casts, color balance issues, just not really worth the time and hassle (unless you enjoy a lot of computer time). Stick to high quality filters to start with and your photography will be more enjoyable.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SimpleJack
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
846 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Washington
     
Aug 08, 2010 06:50 as a reply to  @ argyle's post |  #19

Thanks for the info
I already ordered a Marumi DHG Super Polarizer since it was in my price range of $40 shipped but much more at other websites, and after reading about the testing they did along with about 15 others, this was the top 1 and 3 out of two types of test.
I got one of my CPL filters in the mail today. I got it with a Lenspen w/ cleaning kit and a CPL filter all for $22 shipped, lol.. I figure I might as well just get it to see what it looks like since it was only cost me like $8 more with the filter.
I will do a test on it once i get my better filter in the mail next week and compare the two images and see if people can tell the difference. haha

The thing that worries me the most is being stuck with a filter that leaves me with colors tones that are hard to get rid of. I won't mess around with the DIY stuff. Nothing irritates me more then a bad picture right out of the camera..

So filters that say this:
Specifications:
ND2 Filter
Material: High-quality Plexiglas
Size: 58mm
Bad idea? :lol:

How do you know when you need another type of CPL and how do you know what you are going to be getting?
When I look on website sample images on what the filter does, why are they so small and poor quality images that look like they where taken with a cell phone camera with built in color affects.. Shouldn't they use high quality professional photos to advertise their filter?

I'm very interested in HDR Photography, I may try to get water flow in HDR.

While I'm shopping around for lens filters, is there any other lens filter I might want to look into besides a UV filter?

Sorry for all the question, I just want to get couple filters on hand for the type of picture I wanna take and learn from there


Canon PowerShot S100

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MGH
Senior Member
Avatar
266 posts
Likes: 47
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Malaga,Spain
     
Aug 08, 2010 10:55 |  #20

If you want to shoot landscapes and want good pictures right out of camera as you say I recommend a set of ND grads. I´ve got a set of LEE soft ND grads and use them a lot, but you might want to use HDR when you see the price, you can get cheaper makes but they have a strange color cast.
http://www.leefilters.​com …/show/ref:C4761​03939BDD6/ (external link)
http://www.leefilters.​com …packs/ref:P47A9​C932631F0/ (external link)


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Aug 08, 2010 16:18 |  #21

The Vari-N-Duo is an awesome awesome filter. I sold a regular thickness one off in the search for a thin mount. Missed it while it was gone.


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SimpleJack
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
846 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Washington
     
Aug 08, 2010 23:52 as a reply to  @ TaDa's post |  #22

Those seem to be some real quality filters, little out of my price range though, but I'm sure they would be worth it.
If I had a more expensive camera or more experience, I would probably go for the more higher end filters, but since it's just a 500D I will just get the medium range lens filters.
Or if I'm able to start making some money with my photos, haha.. then I would be more interested in spending more.

Today I just ordered
B+W 58mm ND 3.0-1000x #110 Neutral Density Filter
B + W 58mm 58 mm UV Haze MRC Coated F-Pro Filter

Probably need to get a couple more ND filter once I see what I need once out in the field

Three ND filters from B+W will cost me about $130, so that's not too bad.
I really keep thinking about that Vari-N-Duo.. maybe after a while, I will just sell my ND filters and get one..:)


Canon PowerShot S100

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Aug 09, 2010 06:25 |  #23

Well, things to keep in mind. The Vari-N-Duo is a few filters in one. It's a CPL. On top of that, it's got the ability to be an ND from 2 to 8 stops.

It is expensive though. They are the best. Unfortunately, like most things in photography, you get what you pay for. Want the best, you have to pay a premium. And for you, you'd also have to buy a 58 - 77mm step up ring since it's only available in 77mm.


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Aug 09, 2010 12:30 |  #24

Yea but the biggest con to the Vari-N-Duo is how thick it is and the vignetting you get anywhere wider than 28mm on a full frame. That would pretty much kill half the focal length range of a 17-40 or 16-35 which are common landscape lenses. For the price they want for it and not being able to use it wider than 28mm, I dont think its really worth it if youre looking to shoot a lot of ultra wide angle.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdizzle
Darth Noink
Avatar
69,419 posts
Likes: 65
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Harvesting Nano crystals
     
Aug 09, 2010 12:52 |  #25

I would go the filter holder route if you want to be able to use the entire focal length of your wide angle lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SimpleJack
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
846 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Washington
     
Aug 14, 2010 22:47 as a reply to  @ jdizzle's post |  #26

Just got my +W 58mm ND 3.0-1000x #110 Neutral Density Filter and wow that is a dark filter :eek: I can barely see the TV threw it 3 feet away.

How am I suppose to set the focus and all that if I can't see? :confused: haha..?


Canon PowerShot S100

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Aug 15, 2010 08:06 as a reply to  @ SimpleJack's post |  #27

You have two options. I don't know a thing about your camera body, but I'm guessing that you have Live View? If so, its easy. Determine your aperture and set the camera to Manual mode, lens to MF. Attach the filter, and switch to LV (your camera should see through the filter in LV mode...my 5D2 does). Once in In LV, focus manually, then just simply adjust the shutter speed dial until the meter on the LCD zeroes out. You're done. One caveat...if the meter won't zero out, it most likely means that you'll need to be in bulb mode (but in bright light along the coast, this shouldn't even come up). Basically, when using a 10-stop filter, if the 'unfiltered' shutter speed is at 1/30-sec or slower, you will need to be in bulb mode after attaching the filter.

If you don't have LV, you'll need to meter and focus the scene in Manual mode, then attach the filter and back off the corresponding 10-stops on the SS dial. After focusing the scene, move the lens switch from AF to MF before attaching the filter. If your camera is set to 1/3-stop for each click of the SS dial, just back off 30 clicks after attaching the filter. Again, just be mindful of bulb mode if your light isn't very good.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SimpleJack
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
846 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Washington
     
Aug 15, 2010 19:17 as a reply to  @ argyle's post |  #28

ahh ok thanks.
When I was first messing with it I was in the house and trying to look at the lights and TV and wasn't seeing it, but the outdoor light shines threw.

I think a magnifier would be very helpful for the view finder is these darker situations..
Not sure what BULB mode is since it only left me shutter open for like 1 second when I selected it, but i haven't gotten that far in the instruction book yet :rolleyes:
So much to learn and I get impatient and just wanna take pictures ha!

Been living with point and shoot cameras for so long, it's hard not to just take the camera and run out and "try" to take good pictures.

It's about 95 degrees outside, so I tested the filter out on the sun just to see how dark this filter can go and got a nice picture of a yellow spot with 99% black sky around it.


Canon PowerShot S100

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Aug 15, 2010 19:33 |  #29

SimpleJack wrote in post #10727390 (external link)
ahh ok thanks.
When I was first messing with it I was in the house and trying to look at the lights and TV and wasn't seeing it, but the outdoor light shines threw.

I think a magnifier would be very helpful for the view finder is these darker situations..
Not sure what BULB mode is since it only left me shutter open for like 1 second when I selected it, but i haven't gotten that far in the instruction book yet :rolleyes:
So much to learn and I get impatient and just wanna take pictures ha!

Been living with point and shoot cameras for so long, it's hard not to just take the camera and run out and "try" to take good pictures.

It's about 95 degrees outside, so I tested the filter out on the sun just to see how dark this filter can go and got a nice picture of a yellow spot with 99% black sky around it.

That's a "cool" day for us Texans...we're in a string of 15 straight days of 100+ degrees... :shock:


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SimpleJack
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
846 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Washington
     
Aug 15, 2010 19:35 as a reply to  @ argyle's post |  #30

That's too much hot weather, I been in the house all day. Taking pictures of the sun for a couple minutes, I had to run back in the house after that :p


Canon PowerShot S100

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,607 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
What filter is best for waterfalls and creeks?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2770 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.