Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 06 Aug 2010 (Friday) 17:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which wide-angle lens should i choose?

 
CameraAddict
Member
98 posts
Joined Feb 2010
     
Aug 06, 2010 22:59 |  #16

stephan902 wrote in post #10675126 (external link)
Why?

Why not the Canon for example?

Besides being expensive, if you believe the MTF graphs at lenstip.com the Canon's reslution is optimized at 17-22mm and not nearly as good at 10mm. The Tokina 10mm-24 (for one) is optimized for 10mm, and just okay from there on. Of course other issues exist with the Tamron that might make it a bit weaker than the Canon (gotta stop the Tamron down to get even decent quality). The same exists but is less intense on the Canon. Wide angle lenses seem to be all over the place in terms of quality and performance. It certainly isn't clear which is best for everything. If only we could buy them all and meld them Syfy-like. :lol: (Can you tell it's Syfy Friday?)

Here are the MTF charts I spoke of
Canon: http://www.lenstip.com …USM_Image_resol​ution.html (external link)

Tokina:http://www.lenstip.com …IF)_Image_resol​ution.html (external link)

Based on this, a person might want to choose between the two lenses depending on if they mostly need 10mm shots or mostly need 17-22mm shots.

Update: I should note that I own the Canon, and I'm not a huge fan. It's great sometimes and a huge disappointment at other times....although if it were a $200 lens, I'd be ecstatic with it.


50D, 5D Mark II, 24-105, 70-200 IS, 100-400, 100 f/2.8, 10-22, 70-300 Non-L (for sale), 28-135, 50 f/1.8, Kenko tubes, 430 EX II, Wacom Bamboo Pen/Touch, LR3, PS5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
avantcoreVB
Senior Member
Avatar
322 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
     
Aug 07, 2010 00:39 |  #17

IMO, I'd say that the Tokina 11-16mm is the best UWA lens for cropped camera bodies. But you can't go wrong with the Tokina 11-16, Tokina 12-24 OR the Canon EF-S 10-22.


Gear and Feedback
The camera cannot lie, but it can be an accessory to untruth. - Harold Evans
Theatre is life; film is art; television is furniture.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stephan902
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
22 posts
Joined Aug 2010
     
Aug 07, 2010 06:59 |  #18

So you can say that the Tokinas are both good and the Canon is at well.

Then i guess i would go for the new Tokina as it is much cheaper than the Canon and i would have to buy an extra hood for the Canon.

But finally i cant really decide between: Tokina 12-24mm II, Tokina 11-16mm, Sigma 10-20mm 3.5




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Buzz-01
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
17 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2009
Location: The Netherlands
     
Aug 07, 2010 07:48 |  #19

I have had the same issue a few months ago. I wanted ultrawide, but didn't want to spend a huge amount of money on it. Based on the reviews and user experiences I've read online, the Canon 10-22 would be my best choice. It is priced somewhere around $750 / 700 euros though, a lot more than I would want to spend.
Tokina's 12-24 would also be great, but I would really prefer 10mm over 12mm. Tokina's 11-16mm is really great for low-light, but with its limited range I could already imagine myself switching lenses all the time.
Sigma's 10-20mm would be the more affordable choice, but from what I've read it's slightly less in performance compared to the Canon. But at least it would be affordable to me when buying it brand new...

So, my options were a new Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 or a used Canon 10-22mm. Sigma also has the more expensive f/3.5 version, but that one appears to be not as sharp as the f/4-5.6 but does give you a wider aperture that might be useful for low-light.
I ended up buying the used Canon 10-22mm, and I really have no regret! Great contrast, really vibrant colors, it's all there.

The hood didn't come with it (previous owner shared it with an other lens he kept so he also kept the hood), but a knock-off EW-83E costs just a few bucks on ebay.

Whichever you'd prefer would be up to you I guess. Would you need the f/2.8 of Tokina's 11-16mm, or would you prefer the extra range of Tokina's 12-24mm, or the extra wide-angle of Sigma's 10-20mm? If image quality is high on your list, I'd advise you to go with any of the Tokina's. From what I've seen they are simply amazing in IQ, which I have not seen beaten by either of the two Sigma 10-20's.
If buying a second-hand lens would be fine, I'd advise you to try and obtain a used (not too old) Canon 10-22mm for a reasonable price. That's what I did, and I'm still very happy with it!


50D | 10-22mm | Tamron 17-50mm 2.8 | 18-135mm IS STM | 100mm 2.8 Macro | 70-300mm IS USM | 430EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jardiniboy
Senior Member
508 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Waipahu, Hawaii
     
Aug 07, 2010 07:50 |  #20

Either one you pick will be great but I'm bias I like Tokina over sigma because of my experience with them. I also prefer the built of the Tokina.

The Tokina 11-16 is great because it's wide and fast because it has a max aperture of f/ 2.8 and it's constant. The Tokina 12-24 is also great because it's also wide, constant aperture of f/4, and it's cheap. The sigma is great because it's wider than everything else and it has HSM.


Gear List Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
toxic
Goldmember
3,498 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: California
     
Aug 07, 2010 11:26 |  #21

Here are some tests to look at: http://www.pbase.com/l​ightrules/lenstests (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,177 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Which wide-angle lens should i choose?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2720 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.