Here are a couple more of Keagan. I love the vintage look of these. At first i was a little annoyed by the graininess of them, but in the end I like how it leant to the feel of the pictures. What do you think?
TeresaDarlene Member 61 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Central Illinois More info | Aug 10, 2010 03:22 | #1 Here are a couple more of Keagan. I love the vintage look of these. At first i was a little annoyed by the graininess of them, but in the end I like how it leant to the feel of the pictures. What do you think? "I'm so strongly linked to how I see through the camera that to get to the other side of it would be difficult. It would be as if I were taking a photograph in the dark." ~ Annie Leibovitz
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 10, 2010 03:24 | #2 Ooops! Forgot to add the pictures! "I'm so strongly linked to how I see through the camera that to get to the other side of it would be difficult. It would be as if I were taking a photograph in the dark." ~ Annie Leibovitz
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ckalephoto Goldmember 1,006 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Charlotte, NC More info | Aug 10, 2010 12:29 | #3 Hey Teresa, looking at two of the post you have on the first page currently I can tell you like PS. I think you have cute images and good subjects, but the post work takes away from them IMO. A good image can be enhanced with textures and actions but should be able to stand alone by itself. I really think you should post up some originals. Your comp is strong and I think you would get better feed back from originals or small adjustments. Keep posting... Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cfurlo Member 239 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Pennsylvania More info | Aug 10, 2010 14:26 | #4 I like the composition as well. When you said vintage look, I wasn't expecting to see the bright red and blue of the outfit and think the colors don't fit with the "vintage" description.. I was expecting to see some b/w or sepia, like this post (https://photography-on-the.net …hp?p=10692240&postcount=1). I'd like to see the originals as well. Love the mohawk, cute kid!! Canon 10D/ 50D/ 70-200 f/2.8 L IS/ 28-135 IS/ 50 f/1.8, Tokina 11-16 2.8, 430 EX II, 580 EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 10, 2010 14:32 | #5 Thanks so much Chris. I can't wait to get to the point that my images are good enough to stand on their own without much work. And you are right, I do depend more on photoshop program than I do my camera. I'm very intimidated by the camera. I don't know jack about the technicalities of it, just pick it up and start snapping. Guess it's apparent that my background in photography started with scrapbooking. LOL! I'm starting some classes this fall though, so things can only get better from here. I love posting here for the straight forward critiques and honest opinions. Thanks so much for yours. "I'm so strongly linked to how I see through the camera that to get to the other side of it would be difficult. It would be as if I were taking a photograph in the dark." ~ Annie Leibovitz
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ckalephoto Goldmember 1,006 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Charlotte, NC More info | Aug 10, 2010 15:04 | #6 No problem. Keep shooting and enjoy what your doing. Challenge your self by putting the Camera on auto and noting what it thinks you should do. Then go to manual and set it up the same. From there, adj your f stop and note how the image changes. Then do the same with ISO. We're shooting digital now so 200 crap shots cost nothing but time. Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lookingforaname Senior Member 820 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Collingswood, NJ More info | Aug 11, 2010 14:02 | #7 I think you're maybe over saturating a little bit? And yes, somehow you're overprocessing - all the edges look kind of digitized. I agree - try posting your originals with your end results and maybe some folks can give you some more specific ideas. June Day Photography - Junedayphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hey, I like the idea of shooting in auto then switching to manual and adjusting from there. I know my camera can be linked to my laptop so as I take the pictures I can see the results right away. Now I need to dig out my manual and figure out how to do that. Great tip! Thanks! "I'm so strongly linked to how I see through the camera that to get to the other side of it would be difficult. It would be as if I were taking a photograph in the dark." ~ Annie Leibovitz
LOG IN TO REPLY |
girlincognito Member 105 posts Joined Sep 2008 More info | Love the pictures, not the PP. I think the originals are probably better than you think. [Canon 50D][Canon 24-70,2.8L][Canon 50, 1.8][Speedlite 430ex] [Speedlite 580 exII] [alien bee]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ha! Ha! I don't know about that! LOL!! Here are the pics SOOC. My daughter and I were bored one day so just for giggles we took him outside, set up the backdrop stand, and started snapping. I thought I was in a good shady spot but noticed after I imported the pics how badly the sun was poking through the trees. I learn something new every day. "I'm so strongly linked to how I see through the camera that to get to the other side of it would be difficult. It would be as if I were taking a photograph in the dark." ~ Annie Leibovitz
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ckalephoto Goldmember 1,006 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Charlotte, NC More info | Aug 11, 2010 22:49 | #11 After seeing the SOOC on these Teressa, I can tell you that one problem is you are cropping in way to much for your gear. If you shot these with a 30D in jpeg, then cropped to the images above, you are loosing a ton of mega-pixels. Try to imagine what you want your shot to look like SOOC and compose for it. You will retain more detail that way. Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
girlincognito Member 105 posts Joined Sep 2008 More info | I agree with the above. The quality of the image is bad, not the picture. [Canon 50D][Canon 24-70,2.8L][Canon 50, 1.8][Speedlite 430ex] [Speedlite 580 exII] [alien bee]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NGC2141 Senior Member 318 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: North Carolina More info | Aug 11, 2010 23:14 | #13 I love the idea and creativity of this shot! USMC - Semper Fidelis
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Aug 11, 2010 23:30 | #14 I don't think you are focusing right as the original is really soft. Are you using manual point selection and choosing a point directly over the subject? Are you using single shot AF? It looks like you are attempting to recover detail that isn't there by overuse of PS sharpening tools and it isn't working well, IMO. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 11, 2010 23:33 | #15 Thank you for clarifying that for me, Chris. I thought that with my camera,I had all of these extra mega pixels to spare. So I thought if I started with an image that was 48 x 32 inches (which is the size of the file SOOC) I could crop it as an 8x10 getting rid of unwanted space without harming the quality of the photo. And I usually like my images cropped at creative angles, so i allow for that by zooming out when taking the pictures. Does that make sense? "I'm so strongly linked to how I see through the camera that to get to the other side of it would be difficult. It would be as if I were taking a photograph in the dark." ~ Annie Leibovitz
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 607 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||