Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Kids & Family 
Thread started 10 Aug 2010 (Tuesday) 03:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Vintage look?

 
Teresa ­ Darlene
Member
Avatar
61 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Central Illinois
     
Aug 10, 2010 03:22 |  #1

Here are a couple more of Keagan. I love the vintage look of these. At first i was a little annoyed by the graininess of them, but in the end I like how it leant to the feel of the pictures. What do you think?


"I'm so strongly linked to how I see through the camera that to get to the other side of it would be difficult. It would be as if I were taking a photograph in the dark." ~ Annie Leibovitz

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Teresa ­ Darlene
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
61 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Central Illinois
     
Aug 10, 2010 03:24 |  #2

Ooops! Forgot to add the pictures!


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


"I'm so strongly linked to how I see through the camera that to get to the other side of it would be difficult. It would be as if I were taking a photograph in the dark." ~ Annie Leibovitz

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ckalephoto
Goldmember
Avatar
1,006 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
     
Aug 10, 2010 12:29 |  #3

Hey Teresa, looking at two of the post you have on the first page currently I can tell you like PS. I think you have cute images and good subjects, but the post work takes away from them IMO. A good image can be enhanced with textures and actions but should be able to stand alone by itself. I really think you should post up some originals. Your comp is strong and I think you would get better feed back from originals or small adjustments. Keep posting...

Chris


Chris

Gear 2)1Ds mark ii/EOS 1V/ 50 1.4/135L 2.0/24-105L 4.0/

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cfurlo
Member
239 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
     
Aug 10, 2010 14:26 |  #4

I like the composition as well. When you said vintage look, I wasn't expecting to see the bright red and blue of the outfit and think the colors don't fit with the "vintage" description.. I was expecting to see some b/w or sepia, like this post (https://photography-on-the.net …hp?p=10692240&p​ostcount=1). I'd like to see the originals as well. Love the mohawk, cute kid!!


Canon 10D/ 50D/ 70-200 f/2.8 L IS/ 28-135 IS/ 50 f/1.8, Tokina 11-16 2.8, 430 EX II, 580 EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Teresa ­ Darlene
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
61 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Central Illinois
     
Aug 10, 2010 14:32 |  #5

Thanks so much Chris. I can't wait to get to the point that my images are good enough to stand on their own without much work. And you are right, I do depend more on photoshop program than I do my camera. I'm very intimidated by the camera. I don't know jack about the technicalities of it, just pick it up and start snapping. Guess it's apparent that my background in photography started with scrapbooking. LOL! I'm starting some classes this fall though, so things can only get better from here. I love posting here for the straight forward critiques and honest opinions. Thanks so much for yours.


"I'm so strongly linked to how I see through the camera that to get to the other side of it would be difficult. It would be as if I were taking a photograph in the dark." ~ Annie Leibovitz

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ckalephoto
Goldmember
Avatar
1,006 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
     
Aug 10, 2010 15:04 |  #6

No problem. Keep shooting and enjoy what your doing. Challenge your self by putting the Camera on auto and noting what it thinks you should do. Then go to manual and set it up the same. From there, adj your f stop and note how the image changes. Then do the same with ISO. We're shooting digital now so 200 crap shots cost nothing but time.
When I first got LR i went out and downloaded every preset I could find. Some worked, some didnt. Even for the ones that did it still gave me no understandig of how they worked. PS is the same. Until you grab an image and just start messing with it you wont break away from the presets.
I recently started shooting on white seamless. (I have a couple post in this section) one thing I like about it is there is not alot of room for post work. It is what it is, and you get a chance just to focus on the shot. Sorry to go on like this. Keep shooting and posting.

Btw, I do like the redo of the lady bug shots better. And I can see the painted look you were going for.

Chris


Chris

Gear 2)1Ds mark ii/EOS 1V/ 50 1.4/135L 2.0/24-105L 4.0/

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lookingforaname
Senior Member
820 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Collingswood, NJ
     
Aug 11, 2010 14:02 |  #7

I think you're maybe over saturating a little bit? And yes, somehow you're overprocessing - all the edges look kind of digitized. I agree - try posting your originals with your end results and maybe some folks can give you some more specific ideas.


June Day Photography - Junedayphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Teresa ­ Darlene
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
61 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Central Illinois
     
Aug 11, 2010 21:09 as a reply to  @ ckalephoto's post |  #8

Hey, I like the idea of shooting in auto then switching to manual and adjusting from there. I know my camera can be linked to my laptop so as I take the pictures I can see the results right away. Now I need to dig out my manual and figure out how to do that. Great tip! Thanks!


"I'm so strongly linked to how I see through the camera that to get to the other side of it would be difficult. It would be as if I were taking a photograph in the dark." ~ Annie Leibovitz

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
girl ­ incognito
Member
Avatar
105 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Aug 11, 2010 21:53 as a reply to  @ Teresa Darlene's post |  #9

Love the pictures, not the PP. I think the originals are probably better than you think.


[Canon 50D][Canon 24-70,2.8L][Canon 50, 1.8][Speedlite 430ex] [Speedlite 580 exII] [alien bee]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Teresa ­ Darlene
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
61 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Central Illinois
     
Aug 11, 2010 22:12 as a reply to  @ girl incognito's post |  #10

Ha! Ha! I don't know about that! LOL!! Here are the pics SOOC. My daughter and I were bored one day so just for giggles we took him outside, set up the backdrop stand, and started snapping. I thought I was in a good shady spot but noticed after I imported the pics how badly the sun was poking through the trees. I learn something new every day.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


"I'm so strongly linked to how I see through the camera that to get to the other side of it would be difficult. It would be as if I were taking a photograph in the dark." ~ Annie Leibovitz

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ckalephoto
Goldmember
Avatar
1,006 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
     
Aug 11, 2010 22:49 |  #11

After seeing the SOOC on these Teressa, I can tell you that one problem is you are cropping in way to much for your gear. If you shot these with a 30D in jpeg, then cropped to the images above, you are loosing a ton of mega-pixels. Try to imagine what you want your shot to look like SOOC and compose for it. You will retain more detail that way.

Chris


Chris

Gear 2)1Ds mark ii/EOS 1V/ 50 1.4/135L 2.0/24-105L 4.0/

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
girl ­ incognito
Member
Avatar
105 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Aug 11, 2010 22:52 as a reply to  @ ckalephoto's post |  #12

I agree with the above. The quality of the image is bad, not the picture.


[Canon 50D][Canon 24-70,2.8L][Canon 50, 1.8][Speedlite 430ex] [Speedlite 580 exII] [alien bee]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NGC2141
Senior Member
Avatar
318 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: North Carolina
     
Aug 11, 2010 23:14 |  #13

I love the idea and creativity of this shot!


USMC - Semper Fidelis

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Aug 11, 2010 23:30 |  #14

I don't think you are focusing right as the original is really soft. Are you using manual point selection and choosing a point directly over the subject? Are you using single shot AF? It looks like you are attempting to recover detail that isn't there by overuse of PS sharpening tools and it isn't working well, IMO.

The 30D can take plenty of cropping and still look good at these sizes, so I don't think cropping is the problem. You need to start with a sharper shot. Like others have said, the "art" is there in these shots, but not the technique.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Teresa ­ Darlene
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
61 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Central Illinois
     
Aug 11, 2010 23:33 |  #15

Thank you for clarifying that for me, Chris. I thought that with my camera,I had all of these extra mega pixels to spare. So I thought if I started with an image that was 48 x 32 inches (which is the size of the file SOOC) I could crop it as an 8x10 getting rid of unwanted space without harming the quality of the photo. And I usually like my images cropped at creative angles, so i allow for that by zooming out when taking the pictures. Does that make sense?


Thank you, CG Nelson. I loved the idea of it too. There were many others with him making the funniest expressions that just weren't fixable. :-((


"I'm so strongly linked to how I see through the camera that to get to the other side of it would be difficult. It would be as if I were taking a photograph in the dark." ~ Annie Leibovitz

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,139 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Vintage look?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Kids & Family 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
607 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.