To say that you need to understand more to use manual exposure than to use aperture priority is just wrong.
Absolutely true.
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Aug 13, 2010 10:26 | #46 hpulley wrote in post #10714107 To say that you need to understand more to use manual exposure than to use aperture priority is just wrong. Absolutely true. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimM Goldmember 1,656 posts Likes: 39 Joined Aug 2006 More info | Aug 13, 2010 23:57 | #47 I'm not ashamed to say I use P mode most often. Next would be Tv. I shoot a lot of fast action in changing light. If the lens is long enough, the camera won't let the shutter speed go too low to freeze the action in P as long as there is enough light. With shorter lenses, like the 70-24, P will let the shutter speed drop enough to blur the subject. That's when I tend to use Tv with a shutter speed of about 1/1000. I rarely use anything other than M with flash unless I am just going for fill. As for Av vs Tv, I've seen a lot more pictures ruined by camera shake than I have by depth of field issues.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop" 57,560 posts Likes: 178 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Aug 13, 2010 23:58 | #48 casaaviocar wrote in post #10712652 It's interesting to see this post. I remember arguing this at least a year or so ago. I hinted that maybe the full manual crowd was maybe a little hoity toity in with their full manual bent. I see at least one of whom I argued with now admitting that maybe M wasn't a be all end all. Nobody likes a sore winner... Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheBurningCrown Goldmember 4,882 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2008 More info | Aug 14, 2010 00:25 | #49 To be honest, I shot in Manual 100% of the time all throughout last year. I would spot (well, partial on my XT) meter several objects to base my exposure off of, and then adjust the settings and get a pretty much dead-on exposure just the way I wanted it every time. The downside was that it was a very slow method, and at the end of the day I realized that I spent far more time worrying about changing settings than I did about the picture turning out well. -Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeffreyG "my bits and pieces are all hard" More info | Aug 14, 2010 07:05 | #50 bohdank wrote in post #10713601 There is more than 1 way to skin a cat, not that I have ever skinned a cat. I skinned a deer once, and from that I learned that I prefer to get my meat from the supermarket. I doubt cat would be worth the bother. To be honest, I shot in Manual 100% of the time all throughout last year. I would spot (well, partial on my XT) meter several objects to base my exposure off of, and then adjust the settings and get a pretty much dead-on exposure just the way I wanted it every time. The downside was that it was a very slow method, and at the end of the day I realized that I spent far more time worrying about changing settings than I did about the picture turning out well. Once you had that perfect exposure, it should have continued to be perfect unless a cloud passed in front of the sun, the sun set or you went inside. I'll meter once and then proceed to shoot upwards of 400 photos (if I'm shooting sports) without ever looking at the meter or histogram again. Even in the evening, chimping every 10 to 15 minutes is plenty to account for a setting sun. My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/sets/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Aug 14, 2010 08:53 | #51 When shooting concerts, not what you would call consistent light. Lights are going on and off, performer is moving into/out of the light. The worst mode is one of the Creative ones. You soon figure out the correct exposure for "in the light" and "out of the light". I shoot in M and spin my shutter to account for the changes. It does take some initial chimping until you've settled on the 2, sometimes more, exposures. No way I could do that in Av or Tv. Problem is, I sometimes forget to change the exposure back Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Aug 14, 2010 11:30 | #53 Problem, for me, is that +-2 EC is not enough in Av mode and a changing light meter readings will completely screw up what I have determined my exposure should be. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheBurningCrown Goldmember 4,882 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2008 More info | JeffreyG wrote in post #10719444 Once you had that perfect exposure, it should have continued to be perfect unless a cloud passed in front of the sun, the sun set or you went inside. I'll meter once and then proceed to shoot upwards of 400 photos (if I'm shooting sports) without ever looking at the meter or histogram again. Even in the evening, chimping every 10 to 15 minutes is plenty to account for a setting sun. Or unless I was moving somewhere else. -Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hogloff Cream of the Crop 7,606 posts Likes: 416 Joined Apr 2003 Location: British Columbia More info | Aug 14, 2010 13:25 | #55 Permanent banTheBurningCrown wrote in post #10720482 Or unless I was moving somewhere else. I don't do a lot of shooting at a standstill, so with changing lighting (inside/outside, shade/sun, clouds/no clouds, etc. etc.) I would still keep having to figure out that exposure every minute or so. To be perfectly honest, I have more fun if I can shoot Av mode and not worry about adjusting it too much on the fly. I still shoot manual if the time calls for it (last night even), but Av mode to me now I just enjoy more .Keeping it in AV mode produces the exact exposures in all those conditions? For me that is never the case. For me, AV mode gives me OK images, but not great without some constant EC changes. If I'm going to need to constantly dial in EC to get the exposures I want, I just stick to manual as then I am the only one changing the exposure.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheBurningCrown Goldmember 4,882 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2008 More info | Aug 14, 2010 14:03 | #56 Hogloff wrote in post #10720830 Keeping it in AV mode produces the exact exposures in all those conditions? For me that is never the case. As I said in a previous post, the way I use Av mode is to "grab" the exposure from a part of the scene and lock it down with a half press of the shutter. Yes I need to do some EC changes depending on where I am, but with the method above I can expose the scene how I want it without the time needed to center the meter in manual (which is a pain with the scroll wheel on my XT). If I'm going to need to constantly dial in EC to get the exposures I want, I just stick to manual as then I am the only one changing the exposure. If you have to keep changing EC on the fly then yeah, manual makes far more sense. But if you are for example in an indoor setting where the lighting is changing but all of the walls are white, then setting the EC to somewhere around +1 and leaving it in Av I've found works really well. -Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
itzcryptic Goldmember 1,174 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Cincinnati More info | Aug 15, 2010 11:00 | #57 Shoot whatever mode you want to. No one will ask most likely.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Phrasikleia Goldmember 1,828 posts Likes: 14 Joined May 2008 Location: Based in California and Slovenia More info | I can imagine that there might be some situations where Av or Tv would be easier--perhaps when shooting something like birds on a day with fast moving cloud cover(?)--but in most cases, it's just easier to use M mode. Dial in exactly what you want, chimp your histogram, and you'll get no nasty surprises. Photography by Erin Babnik
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheBurningCrown Goldmember 4,882 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2008 More info | Aug 15, 2010 12:35 | #59 Phrasikleia wrote in post #10725264 Now, as for the problem of forgetting to change something: well, that happens to everyone on occasion, regardless of which mode you use. However, if you get used to letting the camera make changes for you, then you won't be in the habit of checking all settings and will be even more likely to overlook one of them. Eh...I disagree. Unless you're shooting in Green Box or Program, the camera isn't making many decisions for you. If you are asking the camera to determine a shutter speed to match your aperture value, there is no difference between that and "centering the meter" in manual mode. You still have to pay attention to what choices it's making, arguably more so than watching yourself in manual mode. Neither really requires more attentiveness, just different ends of the same stick. -Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeffreyG "my bits and pieces are all hard" More info | Aug 15, 2010 13:44 | #60 TheBurningCrown wrote in post #10725570 Eh...I disagree. Unless you're shooting in Green Box or Program, the camera isn't making many decisions for you. If you are asking the camera to determine a shutter speed to match your aperture value, there is no difference between that and "centering the meter" in manual mode. You still have to pay attention to what choices it's making, arguably more so than watching yourself in manual mode. Neither really requires more attentiveness, just different ends of the same stick. When people tell you they use manual mode, they are not simply centering the needle for each shot. Doing so is silly, it's just a slow version of Av or Tv. My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/sets/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 739 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||