Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 12 Aug 2010 (Thursday) 12:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Rethinking shooting in manual all the time...

 
hpulley
Goldmember
4,390 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Aug 16, 2010 13:32 |  #76

TheBurningCrown wrote in post #10731671 (external link)
I have autofocus set to * and AE Lock set to the shutter half press. As long as I keep the shutter half-pressed, the AE lock remains. Incredibly easy, actually....

But one of the previous poster's points was that you lose that setting after the shot, it is only held while you half press the shutter. As soon as you press the shutter button all the way, it's gone. With * used as AE lock if you hold it down while you press the shutter button it will hold the AE lock for the next shot (or shots if you continue to hold it down) but this is one thing you can't do with * button focusing. If you have an AF-ON button then you can retain * AE lock but it is tough to press and hold * for AE lock, press AF-ON to focus and then hold * while pressing the shutter button. I find Manual is just simpler if lighting conditions really aren't changing but use whatever works for you!


flickr (external link) 1DIIN 40D 1NRS 650 1.4xII EF12II Pel8 50f1.8I 28-80II 17-40L 24-70L 100-400L 177A 199A OC-E3 RS-80N3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheBurningCrown
Goldmember
Avatar
4,882 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2008
     
Aug 16, 2010 17:48 |  #77

hpulley wrote in post #10732104 (external link)
But one of the previous poster's points was that you lose that setting after the shot, it is only held while you half press the shutter. As soon as you press the shutter button all the way, it's gone.

...I don't know what camera you have, but on my XT it keeps that setting as long as I have the shutter pressed down half way, no matter how many pictures I take. A caveat: drive mode has to be on continuous (even if you're taking single shots), otherwise it will refuse to take a second shot without fully pulling off of the shutter.

I find Manual is just simpler if lighting conditions really aren't changing but use whatever works for you!

If you are in a situation where lighting conditions truly aren't changing (at all), then absolutely manual mode makes the most sense. I don't think anyone would rationally disagree with that...


-Dave
Gear List & Feedback
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fast ­ Fredy
Member
168 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Aug 17, 2010 07:40 |  #78

dontcallmeash wrote in post #10710852 (external link)
i tried Av (and its retarded nikon sibling) and found that i still needed to set exposure compensation as needed, so what's the point?

The point of Av is having the camera do some tedious (and sometimes time consuming) work for you. You set the aperture value and the camera changes the shutter speed for you. For instance little kids might not hang around long enough for u to switch settings in M mode going from a view in bright sunlight to them in the shade.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neilwood32
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,231 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland
     
Aug 18, 2010 11:39 |  #79

With practise it is often easy to work out what the difference is and make the adjustment semi automatically - ie I would stop down about 3 stops for the bright sun/ shade transition and would probably find the exposure is pretty good.

The problem with relying on AV or TV is that the scene (and objects in it directly affect the exposure value) so a kid with a white (or dark) Tshirt running across the image might cause the meter to jump (depending on metering mode). This can mean that images 5 secs apart and in the same location can be exposed vastly differently. Unless you watch the metering mode and the subject, you can still miss the shot using AV.


Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams
Keep calm and carry a camera!
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phrasikleia
Goldmember
Avatar
1,828 posts
Likes: 14
Joined May 2008
Location: Based in California and Slovenia
     
Aug 18, 2010 13:30 |  #80

neilwood32 wrote in post #10744394 (external link)
With practise it is often easy to work out what the difference is and make the adjustment semi automatically - ie I would stop down about 3 stops for the bright sun/ shade transition and would probably find the exposure is pretty good.

The problem with relying on AV or TV is that the scene (and objects in it directly affect the exposure value) so a kid with a white (or dark) Tshirt running across the image might cause the meter to jump (depending on metering mode). This can mean that images 5 secs apart and in the same location can be exposed vastly differently. Unless you watch the metering mode and the subject, you can still miss the shot using AV.

Exactly. Good example. Obviously each photographer needs to do whatever works for him/her, but these sorts of situations are exactly what caused me to lose interest in Av and Tv.

I have to say I really don't get the mentality that M mode is somehow hard core. If you can use Av or Tv, you can use M. It's really not any more tedious; in most situations, it just makes things easier. But if for some reason using it causes you to miss important shots, then do something else.


Photography by Erin Babnik (external link) | Newsletter (external link) | Photo Cascadia Team Member (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neilwood32
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,231 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland
     
Aug 19, 2010 07:13 |  #81

The trick with all modes is to understand what you are shooting and how it will affect the metering.

The thing that makes M work for me is the consistency. I control what the exposure is, not some camera software. And it works perfectly well for landscapes (I have time to work).

I can completely understand why some folk use AV/TV but its not my preference.


Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams
Keep calm and carry a camera!
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheBurningCrown
Goldmember
Avatar
4,882 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2008
     
Aug 19, 2010 21:30 as a reply to  @ neilwood32's post |  #82

neilwood32 wrote in post #10744394 (external link)
The problem with relying on AV or TV is that the scene (and objects in it directly affect the exposure value) so a kid with a white (or dark) Tshirt running across the image might cause the meter to jump (depending on metering mode). This can mean that images 5 secs apart and in the same location can be exposed vastly differently. Unless you watch the metering mode and the subject, you can still miss the shot using AV.

But the same is true for M mode. If you're shooting a burst of a kid with a white (or dark) Tshirt which you have exposed properly runs from the sun into the shade, you've missed the shot as well. A situation where Av mode may have gotten it.

Phrasikleia wrote in post #10745018 (external link)
I have to say I really don't get the mentality that M mode is somehow hard core. If you can use Av or Tv, you can use M. It's really not any more tedious; in most situations, it just makes things easier. But if for some reason using it causes you to miss important shots, then do something else.

Agree, but disagree. M mode is only "hardcore" because no one who isn't photographically inclined uses it. So it's "hardcore" because photographers use it, and not Joe Schmo. But M mode can only make things easier in SOME situations, just as Av or Tv mode can make things easier in SOME situations. It depends on the situation and the subject matter. If you're constantly stuck on Av or M, you're going to miss a shot eventually when the time calls for the other. It's about choosing the best tool for the job. If manual always gives you the results you want and you have absolutely zero problems working that way for what you're shooting, by all means stick with that. But if you're fighting with the camera constantly to get a decent exposure as the lighting conditions are changing, by all means work with Av mode.


-Dave
Gear List & Feedback
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robertogee
Member
Avatar
172 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Dec 21, 2010 03:56 as a reply to  @ post 10732028 |  #83

My 40D stays on Manual. It takes one or two seconds to assess a situation and know whether Av or (less likely Tv) or P (usually with +/- EV compensation) will be faster or better.

I back button focus almost exclusively, mostly in One Shot Mode, sometimes in AI-Servo.


EOS 7D | EOS 40D | EF 85mm 1.8 | Canon 10-22 | Canon 50mm 1.8 | Canon 28-135mm | Tamron 17-35mm | Tamron 28-200mm LD | Tamron 70-300mm | 580 EX II | 430 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,914 views & 0 likes for this thread, 43 members have posted to it.
Rethinking shooting in manual all the time...
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
738 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.