neilwood32 wrote in post #10744394
The problem with relying on AV or TV is that the scene (and objects in it directly affect the exposure value) so a kid with a white (or dark) Tshirt running across the image might cause the meter to jump (depending on metering mode). This can mean that images 5 secs apart and in the same location can be exposed vastly differently. Unless you watch the metering mode and the subject, you can still miss the shot using AV.
But the same is true for M mode. If you're shooting a burst of a kid with a white (or dark) Tshirt which you have exposed properly runs from the sun into the shade, you've missed the shot as well. A situation where Av mode may have gotten it.
Phrasikleia wrote in post #10745018
I have to say I really don't get the mentality that M mode is somehow hard core. If you can use Av or Tv, you can use M. It's really not any more tedious; in most situations, it just makes things easier. But if for some reason using it causes you to miss important shots, then do something else.
Agree, but disagree. M mode is only "hardcore" because no one who isn't photographically inclined uses it. So it's "hardcore" because photographers use it, and not Joe Schmo. But M mode can only make things easier in SOME situations, just as Av or Tv mode can make things easier in SOME situations. It depends on the situation and the subject matter. If you're constantly stuck on Av or M, you're going to miss a shot eventually when the time calls for the other. It's about choosing the best tool for the job. If manual always gives you the results you want and you have absolutely zero problems working that way for what you're shooting, by all means stick with that. But if you're fighting with the camera constantly to get a decent exposure as the lighting conditions are changing, by all means work with Av mode.