IMO 24-70 is less in need of an update than 100-400... also, if they could extend it to 24-85, it'd be a far more useful standard zoom for full frame.
Shadowblade Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 13, 2010 04:57 | #31 IMO 24-70 is less in need of an update than 100-400... also, if they could extend it to 24-85, it'd be a far more useful standard zoom for full frame.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sebr Goldmember  4,628 posts Likes: 9 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sweden/France More info | Aug 13, 2010 05:18 | #32 Canon will probably announce lenses at Photokina next month. Sebastien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cotmweasel Senior Member  995 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Dallas, TX More info | Aug 13, 2010 05:34 | #33 Shadowblade wrote in post #10713357  IMO 24-70 is less in need of an update than 100-400... also, if they could extend it to 24-85, it'd be a far more useful standard zoom for full frame. I would think it would go the other way though. more like an 18-70mm f/2.8 IS -Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wask_ Senior Member  297 posts Joined Mar 2010 More info | Aug 13, 2010 05:44 | #34 EF-S 15mm f/1.4 ( please! ) - 7D -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
skyd123 Member 31 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Slovakia, Bratislava More info | Aug 13, 2010 05:50 | #35 17-55mm L f/2.8 IS USM but EF, not EF-S C5Dc, 16-35MK1, 580EX II, 70-200F4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 "spouting off stupid things"  56,266 posts Likes: 2948 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Aug 13, 2010 05:55 | #36 Saint728 wrote in post #10711295 Hopefully they have a new 400mm prime in the works? Maybe a 400mm f/5.6L IS? How about a new 100-400mm f/4.0L IS non-pump lens? Maybe a new 200-500mm lens for us people that can't afford a $6,500 prime? Take Care, Cheers, Patrick Thats my wish. 400mm is just not long enough at times and I'm not a fan of Sigma and can't afford the current 500mm Canon puts out. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MotoXPunk481 Member 159 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Kernersville, NC More info | Aug 13, 2010 06:21 | #37 I'd like to see a 14-24 2.8L or the 24-70 MkII. Also a 200-400 4L IS sounds nice. We'll just have to wait and see! (2X) Canon EOS 5DII | Canon EOS 5D w/ Grip | Canon EOS 40D w/ Grip | Canon Digital Rebel XT w/ Grip | 16-35 2.8L II | (2X) 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS | 50 1.2L | 24 1.4L II | 28-135 3.5-5.6 IS | 100 2.8 macro | (3X) 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Fodowsky Senior Member  591 posts Joined May 2007 Location: Dallas, TX More info | Aug 13, 2010 06:58 | #38 I'd much prefer a 24-105 2.8 IS over a 24-70. But I'd take either if they are as sharp as the new 70-200 II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
richardfox Goldmember  1,883 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Bellbrook, Ohio, USA More info | Aug 13, 2010 07:59 | #39 I just heard it's going to be a 14-500 f1.4 IS zoom, with the lens body constructed from unobtanium for lightness and strength. Price target is $49.00US. Should be available for the holiday season in 2110. I've already pre-ordered one from the National Enquirer! All I have to do now is wait for delivery! Canon 50D gripped, EF 50/1.8, EF-S 10-22, 17-40L, 24-105L, 70-200 f/2.8L, 100/2.8 macro, 100-400L, 300 2.8L, Canon 500 f8 mirror with chipped EF mount, 580EX, 1.4x and 2x Canon teleconverters, Canon EF Life-Size converter.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jgeisen Member  66 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: Iowa City, IA More info | Aug 13, 2010 08:16 | #40 I'd be happy with the following. ~ Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fyu Member 34 posts Joined Jul 2010 More info | Aug 13, 2010 08:26 | #41  Permanent banCanon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM MKII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LarryWeinman Goldmember 1,438 posts Likes: 66 Joined Jul 2006 More info | Aug 13, 2010 08:34 | #42 Saint728 wrote in post #10711295 Hopefully they have a new 400mm prime in the works? Maybe a 400mm f/5.6L IS? How about a new 100-400mm f/4.0L IS non-pump lens? Maybe a new 200-500mm lens for us people that can't afford a $6,500 prime? Take Care, Cheers, Patrick If it's like the Nikon 200-400 lens it will probably cost more then $6500 7D Mark II 6D 100mm f 2.8 macro 180mm f 3.5 macro, MP-E-65 300mm f 2.8 500mm f4 Tokina 10-17mm fisheye 10-22mm 17-55mm 24-105mm 70-300mm 70-200 f 2.8 Mk II 100-400mm Mk II 1.4 TCIII 2X TCIII 580EX II 430 EX II MT 24 EX Sigma 150-600
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nureality Goldmember 3,611 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2008 More info | Aug 13, 2010 09:02 | #43 gte357s wrote in post #10711504 Bigger and heavier than the Brick? - we will call it the Rock if it gets the Hybrid IS, you can calling the ROLLING ROCK! Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nureality Goldmember 3,611 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2008 More info | Aug 13, 2010 09:03 | #44 I know this is the Lens Forum, but I'm more excited about the possibility of a new flagship Speedlite. Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kiwikat Goldmember  1,024 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Appleton, WI More info | Aug 13, 2010 09:06 | #45 DreDaze wrote in post #10710946 they're saying a 35mm f1.8... I really hope this is the case. Either EF or EF-S, it doesnt matter to me. Just have nice build quality, optical quality, and ring USM. I'd happily pay 500 bucks for a nice 35mm lens. If not, I'll probably get the Tammy 17-50 2.8... "Would you really want to be the Canon rep responsible for dealing with POTN?" -FlyingPhotog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mbagwu 742 guests, 187 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
