| POLL: "What do you think about your Sigma 17-50 OS HSM?" |
 Love it, look at my samples, they are simply breath-taking | 6 30% |
| For the money i could have just spent 200-300 more for the 17-55. | 2 10% |
| Not worth the money, simply over price tube of glass... | 0 0% |
| Not owned it and wrather interested in it myself... | 12 60% |
Aug 12, 2010 19:38 | #1 Anyone who has this lens can you comment on the image quality and autofocus. I'm really tempted to purchase this lens over the 17-55 IS. I've owned two copies of the 17-55 now and both have had something wrong with them. Whether it be a soft focus issue or a faulty IS system. Gear: Canon 7d MkI, Sigma 18-35 f/1.8, Sigma 50 f/1.4 ART, Canon 100 2.8 Macro, 600ex-rt, 2x 580ex-rt II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CountryBoy "Tired of Goldmember label"  5,168 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Okie More info | Aug 12, 2010 20:11 | #2 I'm interested in it . The price difference between it and the Canon is closer to $400. Hi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
District_History_Fan Goldmember 2,286 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2008 More info | The talk of extreme border softness has me concerned, but I am very interested in this lens. Can't wait for more formal tests...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1046 guests, 104 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
