Yes, via AC9. Soon to be available
Oh look, there goes more money...
- enable/disable the bottom shoe.
- make it a transmitter only, not just a transciever (transmitter & receiver)
Sound like killer features to me 
I *am* knocking the PWs though
.
The main reason that I'm knocking them is two fold. The biggest one is that I *want* them to work so badly. I'd love a nice off-camera TTL solution. Unfortunately, the PWs really under delivered on that promised. And people are somewhat gullible about that and revere PW so much because of their past achievements that they don't see how horribly designed the Flex/Mini are - especially compared to the price.
I'd love to like the PW Flex/Mini, but I can't.
It doesn't it badly. Heard allot of good reviews about it and it seems like a few pros use it.
No, it does do it badly - as soon as you have more than one flash off camera. Canon's wireless TTL does it well. That's my bar. Radio Poppers thusly do it well, but their piggy-back setup unfortunately sucks.
I know it's yet to be determined that's why I qualified it with my "may or may not". I've read quite a few posts about dead 580's by now though. Before the Flex/Mini came out everybody called the 580 rock solid. My 580's are in fact rock solid. So I'd at least be somewhat suspicious.
If you go and design an addon to a product, you should better darn well make sure it works well with that product - no matter how crappy the product is.
You know quite well that that's not much of a solution in most situations.
That's great news and I'm very glad!
Not really, but I won't elaborate on this.
I don't like the piggy-back system the RPs use, but at least it works *well*. In camera TTL control, groups, ratios, etc., etc. If it weren't for the piggy back setup, I'd have 'em in a heart beat.
I don't think so. Or at least not on a scale as the RF-602 vs. Flex/Mini debate which is a factor of 5x.



