no, i know the 580 will still require IR. I'm saying, that i want 1.) a 580, and 2.) a wireless trigger.
the 580 is not the issue here, it's the wireless trigger. still deciding which one to get
no, i know the 580 will still require IR. I'm saying, that i want 1.) a 580, and 2.) a wireless trigger.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
johnlo Goldmember 1,113 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | Aug 16, 2010 08:23 | #32 i LOVE my Flex/Mini. they work great. I do not have any problems or misfire when using it with my 580EX and 580EX II. yes I do have 430EX II and now that's pretty much what I am using for my OCF. The 580EX II are only being use when I need a flash on top camera or mini. its cheaper to get two 430EX II then buying two 580EX II. Plus you dont really need that much power if you gonna use OCF. you can ALWAYS move the flash closer to the subject. johnlo photography :
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ecub Goldmember 1,487 posts Joined May 2010 Location: Southwest suburbs of Chicago More info | Aug 16, 2010 11:32 | #33 RLPhoto wrote in post #10730046 no, i know the 580 will still require IR. I'm saying, that i want 1.) a 580, and 2.) a wireless trigger. the 580 is not the issue here, it's the wireless trigger. still deciding which one to get For Non TTL, you're choices are: - Ed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BoneJj Goldmember 1,269 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Southwest Florida More info | Aug 16, 2010 13:09 | #34 |
ecub Goldmember 1,487 posts Joined May 2010 Location: Southwest suburbs of Chicago More info | Aug 16, 2010 13:12 | #35 BoneJj wrote in post #10731970 ^^^^ actually you are wrong in the assumption that you need a flash on top of the camera to work with the radiopoppers. Their new system doesn't require that. Thanks for the correction. I modified my above post. - Ed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BoneJj Goldmember 1,269 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Southwest Florida More info | Aug 16, 2010 13:25 | #36 ecub wrote in post #10731994 Thanks for the correction. I modified my above post. yeah, you should check out the new JRX system. I've been wanting to get some of those for a while now. they would make life so easy. plus they are something like nearly 1/2 the cost of other systems out there. granted TRUE TTL straight from the camera does require other stuff but the jrx units allow for simple dial control of the strobes. --Bone | FSS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nightdiver13 Unabashed nerd! 2,272 posts Likes: 38 Joined May 2010 Location: Bigfoot Country More info | Aug 16, 2010 13:32 | #37 There are also the Pixel Knights for your list of TTL triggers. They go for about $150, give or take, on eBay. — Neil
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BoneJj Goldmember 1,269 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Southwest Florida More info | Aug 16, 2010 13:42 | #38 Nightdiver13 wrote in post #10732106 There are also the Pixel Knights for your list of TTL triggers. They go for about $150, give or take, on eBay. who makes these? and wow, 150 a pop, that's not horrible but it's certainly not great either. --Bone | FSS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nightdiver13 Unabashed nerd! 2,272 posts Likes: 38 Joined May 2010 Location: Bigfoot Country More info | Aug 16, 2010 13:44 | #39 BoneJj wrote in post #10732181 who makes these? and wow, 150 a pop, that's not horrible but it's certainly not great either. It'd be nice if we could get good ttl for around 100 a unit.... Pixel is the manufacturer, and $150 is for the receiver/transmitter pair. Pixel makes other accessories, such as the generally well regarded external battery pack for speedlites. — Neil
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ecub Goldmember 1,487 posts Joined May 2010 Location: Southwest suburbs of Chicago More info | Aug 16, 2010 13:50 | #40 I wanted to try the PK's, but I can't find a place to buy the receivers only. I'm thinking of buying 1 transmitter 3/receiver set. - Ed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nightdiver13 Unabashed nerd! 2,272 posts Likes: 38 Joined May 2010 Location: Bigfoot Country More info | Aug 16, 2010 13:55 | #41 ecub wrote in post #10732231 I wanted to try the PK's, but I can't find a place to buy the receivers only. I'm thinking of buying 1 transmitter 3/receiver set. HERE — Neil
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BoneJj Goldmember 1,269 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Southwest Florida More info | Aug 16, 2010 14:01 | #42 Nightdiver13 wrote in post #10732199 Pixel is the manufacturer, and $150 is for the receiver/transmitter pair. Pixel makes other accessories, such as the generally well regarded external battery pack for speedlites. that's not half bad there... but yeah, I'd have to do some digging on their product to see if it's problematic or worth the money vs another system. Seeing as this is the first I'm hearing of them it will require some research. --Bone | FSS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nightdiver13 Unabashed nerd! 2,272 posts Likes: 38 Joined May 2010 Location: Bigfoot Country More info | Aug 16, 2010 14:12 | #43 BoneJj wrote in post #10732304 that's not half bad there... but yeah, I'd have to do some digging on their product to see if it's problematic or worth the money vs another system. Seeing as this is the first I'm hearing of them it will require some research. I also would want to be able to buy just the receivers as well, as I expand my kit/strobes. You only need one transmitter so you should be able to buy the receivers without issue as a single unit. Also looking at these units... it's a bit disapointing that they place the screen/buttons where they do. That makes it really difficult to make adjustments or changes to the unites once you place a flash on top. You would either have to disconnect the strobe and then change whatever on the receiver. Wow, you're spot on with your first glance! The positioning of that is one of the main complaints of those units. HERE is the POTN thread about these. Very long and detailed, and thanks in large part to CliveyBoy, VERY informative and helpful. If you flip to the last page, you'll see that these have gone through several revisions, and while far from perfect, are a very viable alternative to the PW and RP units. — Neil
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BoneJj Goldmember 1,269 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Southwest Florida More info | Aug 16, 2010 14:48 | #44 Nightdiver13 wrote in post #10732367 Wow, you're spot on with your first glance! The positioning of that is one of the main complaints of those units. HERE is the POTN thread about these. Very long and detailed, and thanks in large part to CliveyBoy, VERY informative and helpful. If you flip to the last page, you'll see that these have gone through several revisions, and while far from perfect, are a very viable alternative to the PW and RP units. lol, thanks. yeah I recognize this because of the issues with my Cactus v4 set. their on switch is on the top next to where the flash sits, I now keep a few paper clips in the side pockets of my bag so that I can flip the switches on and off. without having to remove the strobe when I'm taking a brake form shooting but don't want to tear down my setup. --Bone | FSS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ecub Goldmember 1,487 posts Joined May 2010 Location: Southwest suburbs of Chicago More info | Aug 16, 2010 14:59 | #45 Nightdiver13 wrote in post #10732259 HERE Only places I've seen them is with a set with 1 transmitter and 1 receiver. I haven't seen any places that sell, additional receiver kits. Like the RF-602's where you can buy 2-4 receivers as a set with 1 transmitter. But at $100 per receiver, I may have to hold off trying them, since I already spent some $$$ on 4 FlexTT5's. Besides, since the PK's are rather new, I'm sure there are bugs as well. I might as well wait until a version 2 comes out on the PK's. - Ed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2913 guests, 137 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||