Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 16 Aug 2010 (Monday) 12:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2 f4 lenses, and 1 f2.0 manual focus only lens...should I use the EG-S Screen?

 
NatDeroxL7
Goldmember
Avatar
1,254 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 521
Joined Dec 2009
     
Aug 16, 2010 12:14 |  #1

Any advice on this? Yes, it will be uber dark with the f4s, or so they say, but without it, I will have a hard time manual focusing my Zeiss 2.0?

Is it harder to manual focus with the regular screen or harder to deal with a darker screen at f4?

Thanks!


https://www.instagram.​com/nd14411 (external link)
https://natedphoto.myp​ortfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Aug 16, 2010 15:08 |  #2

If you have a crop camera, it may be an issue. If you have a FF, the matte screen doesn't have that much of a darkening effect at f/4. In good light, I'm able to manually focus the Eg-S screen with the lens stopped down to f/8. The "darkening" is not as bad as some make it out to be, and is usually overexaggerated,


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Aug 16, 2010 17:26 |  #3

I use it with all my lenses. I haven't reinstalled the OEM screen since I took it out.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ K
Goldmember
Avatar
1,637 posts
Joined Apr 2001
Location: San Francisco area
     
Aug 17, 2010 00:04 |  #4

NatDeroxL7 wrote in post #10731640 (external link)
Any advice on this? Yes, it will be uber dark with the f4s, or so they say, but without it, I will have a hard time manual focusing my Zeiss 2.0?

If you are considering the EG-S screen, I presume you have a 5DmkII? If so for precise focusing of the Zeiss, use Live View 5-10X. Live view is much more accurate and precise than the viewfinder (even with EG-S). However under some conditions Live View 5X is too jumpy for good MF adjustments. If you need quicker MF than Live View, use focus confirm with the Zeiss. Micro adjust will change the focus confirm setting, so make sure and calibrate your lenses for MA.
Mike K


Canon 6D, 1DmkII, IR modified 5DII with lots of Canon L, TSE and Zeiss ZE lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lannes
Goldmember
Avatar
4,370 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Aug 17, 2010 00:34 |  #5

Mike K wrote in post #10735538 (external link)
If so for precise focusing of the Zeiss, use Live View 5-10X. Live view is much more accurate and precise than the viewfinder (even with EG-S).

+1 for live view based manual focusing.


1Dx, 1DM4, 5DM2, 7D, EOS-M, 8-15L, 17-40L, 24 TSE II, 24-105L, 50L, 85L II, 100L, 135L, 200L f/2.8, 300L f/4, 70-200L II, 70-300L, 400Lf/5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rvdw98
Goldmember
Avatar
1,592 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Netherlands
     
Aug 17, 2010 00:37 |  #6

lannes wrote in post #10735647 (external link)
+1 for live view based manual focusing.

I guess that would work well for (relatively) static subjects and/or with your camera on a tripod, but wouldn't a 10x magnified Live View be way too jumpy for, say, street photography? And how would you frame your shot like this?


Roy

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NatDeroxL7
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,254 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 521
Joined Dec 2009
     
Aug 17, 2010 05:14 |  #7

rvdw98 wrote in post #10735656 (external link)
I guess that would work well for (relatively) static subjects and/or with your camera on a tripod, but wouldn't a 10x magnified Live View be way too jumpy for, say, street photography? And how would you frame your shot like this?

It is hard to use on the fly. I've used 10x manual for every time I'm using a tripod and want to ensure focus on the most exact point of the subject possible, regardless of lens.

On the fly, the best you can do is focus on the point you want, then un-zoom from 10x, and re-frame without touching the focus ring. Not the fastest, zero ability to track moving subjects.

I think I will go with the EG-S. Some day I will own all 2.8 and faster lenses, and I will appreciate the added brightness even more.


https://www.instagram.​com/nd14411 (external link)
https://natedphoto.myp​ortfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Aug 17, 2010 06:25 as a reply to  @ NatDeroxL7's post |  #8

Focusing is just fine with the Eg-S screen...no need to use LV all the time IMO. Trust me on this...been shooting with MF lenses for quite a few years with digital, first with the Ee-S and now the Eg-S...focusing through the VF is very easy. If I'm using a tripod and need critical focus, I'll use LV. If not, then its the VF.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Aug 17, 2010 20:59 |  #9

My experience is, leave it in. I don't manually focus often but I do find having the matte screen let's me see where I am actually AF'ing far more accurately. My keeper rate, shooting concerts, has gone up, noticeably since I started using the matte screen. Before that, I would sometimes end up AF'ing on a guitar neck or somethig other than the face and not notice. I can see that now and adjust.

With that said, AF confirm chips are crap, imo. If you are going to be shooting at f2.8 or slower, then, yes, they will sort of work. With fast lenses, wide open, they almost guarantee an OOF shot. The tolerance level seems to be very high in the 2 chipped adapters (different sources) that I have.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ K
Goldmember
Avatar
1,637 posts
Joined Apr 2001
Location: San Francisco area
     
Aug 18, 2010 01:34 |  #10

I use focus confirm when hand holding a Canon 24 TSE II or Zeiss 21 f2.8, 35 f2 or 50 f3 makro planar. All of these are optimized with micro adjust settings. I also have the EG-S screen installed, but prefer the MA, as I put more attention to framing when using the viewfinder. If you have the time, rock the focus back and forth over the focus confirm setting to get a feel for what you are focusing on.

Again, if possible, Live View 5-10X is far more accurate.


Canon 6D, 1DmkII, IR modified 5DII with lots of Canon L, TSE and Zeiss ZE lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,167 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
2 f4 lenses, and 1 f2.0 manual focus only lens...should I use the EG-S Screen?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2769 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.