Hi there everyone, just registered, and this is my first post, but i check potn for some time now.
I'm in need of some expert help 
I know you've been bombarded by this type of question for some time now, but i need some help to burn some money :P
So, here it goes, I'm thinking on buying a camera, and until now I was able to narrow it down to 2 cameras, 7d and 5d markII(because of video, construction quality,features,etc). I'm having some trouble deciding between the two, and this is why;
For starters, budget. Thinking on getting the 7d with lame good glass, L series type, but I don't what to commit to EF-s lenses, EF only so I can go full frame in the future, maybe a 24-70mm (Canon or Sigma). Second option 5d MarkII and 50mm prime (F1.4 Canon or Sigma).
What I'l be shooting is portrait, family photos, street photography, low light, maybe macro and landscape.
By this last description I think most people would point to the 5d, but my problem is, investing in a 2+ years old camera is a good move? Would´t it be better to go to a much newer camera? The 5d mark III should be out next year. Another issue with the 5d is the AF problems that I've been reading, is it that bad? But image quality is also really important to me, and I know there's nothing like FF.
Grinding my brain with this for some time now :P
Just one other thing, lenses now. Canon 24-70mm L, the brick, still good to be buying now, or should wait for newer version? And the new Sigma 24-70mm, is it comparable to the brick in terms of image quality? It's much smaller, major plus.
Thanks,
5D MarkII

