These were both created from the same set of 3 photos (bracketed exposure). One was hand masked, and the other processed using Enfuse. I'm curious which you think is best as I can't decide. Good enough for a large canvas gallery wrap? Thanks!
DougVaughn Senior Member  260 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2010 Location: Franklin, TN More info | Aug 17, 2010 21:50 | #1 These were both created from the same set of 3 photos (bracketed exposure). One was hand masked, and the other processed using Enfuse. I'm curious which you think is best as I can't decide. Good enough for a large canvas gallery wrap? Thanks! Doug Vaughn
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LaMyxine Member 128 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: New Orleans - USA & Eastern France More info | Aug 17, 2010 22:06 | #2 1 looks more reallistic, 2 has more punch but it's a bit too much on el Capitan. Anyway, the picture is amazing. It's worth the print IMO
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SubliM3 Goldmember More info | Aug 17, 2010 22:09 | #3 Both winners to me, but the second one has a little more detail visible to me. http://500px.com/MitchT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
raiyo Senior Member 269 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2009 More info | i like the 2nd one more
LOG IN TO REPLY |
clamber Senior Member 321 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2008 More info | Aug 17, 2010 22:18 | #5 #2 for me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gcflora "I'm not normal"  1,544 posts Likes: 7 Joined May 2009 Location: Australia More info | Aug 17, 2010 23:52 | #6 |
bassman1231 Member 33 posts Joined Jul 2004 Location: Owensboro, Ky More info | Aug 17, 2010 23:59 | #7 Putting them side by side, I'm leaning toward the 1st one. The mountains in the back are "lighter" in the 2nd and when compared to the 1st seem more "real." So number 1 for me all though both are great.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tgr141291 Senior Member 352 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: South West, UK More info | Aug 18, 2010 05:29 | #8 Although I cant see any difference between the two - the 2nd one seems better to me Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
-Óscar- Member 33 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: Tenerife, Canary Island More info | Aug 18, 2010 08:35 | #9 2 Canon 5D Mark III + Canon 24-70 mm f/2.8 L + Canon 50mm f/1.8 II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GDane123 Senior Member  500 posts Joined Apr 2009 Location: CO More info | Aug 18, 2010 12:05 | #10 #2 because they're both realistic/believable, so why not go with the more colorful one?.. All shots done with Canon SX10
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bakedcookies Senior Member 860 posts Joined Jul 2008 More info | Aug 18, 2010 17:50 | #11 2 for me
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jhoag Senior Member  More info |
jdizzle Darth Noink  69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Aug 19, 2010 07:14 | #13 I love the second one myself. Print it!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lindsaytblum Goldmember  2,540 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Chesterfield, MO More info | Aug 19, 2010 10:33 | #14 #2 for me! More details in #2, but not overly processed IMO. Gorgeous capture! Canon 7D | 24-70mm f/2.8L II, 135mm f/2.0L, 100mm f/2.8L IS USM, 85mm f/1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PerfectTan Senior Member  440 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: Washington More info | Yes, I'll have to agree with the majority here and that #2 is the best of the two. My Gear: Do you really want to know?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1357 guests, 189 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
