Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 23 Aug 2010 (Monday) 16:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best replacement for a 135L/ 85 1.2 or a 70-200?

 
eye2i
Goldmember
1,791 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 65
Joined Jul 2009
     
Aug 23, 2010 16:52 |  #1

Today is a sad day. I finally but regretfully sold my 135L. Colors,saturation,boke​h,build,weight...this lens has it all. But for someone on a budget, I simply can't afford to keep this and buy another long focal range type of lens. So my eyes are set on a 85 1.2 MII or a 70-200 2.8 IS MII soon. I left the 70-200 f/4 out of the equation because at times, I love the blur effects a 2.8 or lower apertures creates.

I mainly shoot portraits, models and will possibly get into engagement sessions soon. What do you think will be a better replacement? I have absolutely nothing but a 24LII at the moment.

Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevindar
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,050 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2007
Location: california
     
Aug 23, 2010 17:51 |  #2

tough call. having owned 2.8IS 1, 85 1.2, and 135 L, the good news is that the 135 was my least favorite. I sold it, and held on to the other 2. the 7-2 2.8 IS is the more practical and versatile, and the one I would recommend. 85 1.2 is a magical lens, but the other lens is your more bread and butter lens.


My Flickr (external link)
Gear List
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205576

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eye2i
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,791 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 65
Joined Jul 2009
     
Aug 23, 2010 18:43 |  #3

kevindar wrote in post #10774285 (external link)
tough call. having owned 2.8IS 1, 85 1.2, and 135 L, the good news is that the 135 was my least favorite. I sold it, and held on to the other 2. the 7-2 2.8 IS is the more practical and versatile, and the one I would recommend. 85 1.2 is a magical lens, but the other lens is your more bread and butter lens.

Thanks. Was the 85 1.2's focusing an issue to you?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevindar
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,050 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2007
Location: california
     
Aug 23, 2010 18:51 |  #4

No focusing issue with 85 1.2. I have the MkII. Love that lens. Taken some of my favorite images with it, but mostly b/c I use it indoors for family images, when even 2.8 is too slow. However, I have been quite happy with 2.8IS, and the newer one has better IS, and is even sharper.


My Flickr (external link)
Gear List
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205576

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HeleneD
Goldmember
Avatar
1,823 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 18
Joined Oct 2009
Location: CT
     
Aug 23, 2010 19:12 |  #5

You won't miss the 135 once you own the 85L. It wow's me everytime I use it. I love that lens.


Canon 5D3
35L, 85L, 24-70L, 70-200L
FACEBOOK (external link)
flickr (external link)
WEBSITE (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eye2i
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,791 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 65
Joined Jul 2009
     
Aug 23, 2010 19:58 |  #6

kevindar wrote in post #10774595 (external link)
No focusing issue with 85 1.2. I have the MkII. Love that lens. Taken some of my favorite images with it, but mostly b/c I use it indoors for family images, when even 2.8 is too slow. However, I have been quite happy with 2.8IS, and the newer one has better IS, and is even sharper.

See, that's my problem. I have been spoiled by a 2.0 aperture. My last 2.8 (24-70) was too slow for me, thats why I have been thinking about the 85 1.2 but OTOH, 70-200's versatility cannot be replaced by a prime.

HeleneD wrote in post #10774712 (external link)
You won't miss the 135 once you own the 85L. It wow's me everytime I use it. I love that lens.

I saw the pictures you took of your son Alex. did you use your 85L for that one? You have the 85L mark I correct?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,707 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Best replacement for a 135L/ 85 1.2 or a 70-200?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
619 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.