For those of you who dislike the camera, what would you have put into the 60d had you been in charge?
If they just would have kept everything about the 50d the same (including no video) and made a new camera to have better high iso than the 7D I would have thought they would have had a winner. However with this marketing strategy I would be aiming for people to want to upgrade. If you are a current rebel owner than you probably already have video and can just pull out that camera if you want to shoot video. If you are a xxd owner then your probably thinking to yourself "I dont have video now and can still do without it in light of being able to have very high iso shot at low noise".
If canon is marketing this to people who dont own dslr's then the only thing going for them is their name brand" The new entry level Nikon d3100 (for the price) and the Sony a55 both would intrigue me more as a first time buyer than the 60D. And if I wanted to go Canon then I would seriously consider the 550d.
Now this isnt to say that the 60D wont be an excellent camera but the thing is in todays dslr market what camera isnt an excellent camera?




