FYI, my offer still stands guys and gals.
EDIT:
if you re the second one, contact me for special pricing.
Mastamarek Goldmember 1,882 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Warsaw, Poland More info | Aug 26, 2010 02:33 | #46 FYI, my offer still stands guys and gals. [Facebook®
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JelleVerherstraeten Goldmember 2,440 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Antwerp, Belgium More info | Aug 26, 2010 02:33 | #47 |
Zerimar Goldmember 3,529 posts Likes: 267 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Los Angeles More info | Aug 26, 2010 02:40 | #48 I hope I am able to pick up a older 300 f2.8 now for a lot cheaper off of craigslist because it's no longer the best Rick Rose - Add me!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ok_Student3368 Senior Member 767 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2009 More info | Aug 26, 2010 02:49 | #49 The original 300 f/2.8 is gonna shoot up in price huh?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AdamJL Goldmember 4,365 posts Likes: 13 Joined May 2006 Location: 'Straya More info | Aug 26, 2010 04:12 | #50 Wow, that 400 is.. wow.. just... wow
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop" 57,560 posts Likes: 178 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Aug 26, 2010 04:25 | #51 The new 400 in some ways looks as if they re-engineered it into the 400 DO chassis... Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vinnie6756 Goldmember 1,075 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2009 Location: 45° 6' 0" N / 87° 37' 50" W a.k.a - Marinette, WI More info | Aug 26, 2010 04:41 | #52 There sure is a lot of glass in the front of these two new beauties!! However, at the prices these are going to sell for, I'll have to settle with my 300 for a while and possibly pick up a 400 MK I somewhere down the road!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cfnz Member 105 posts Joined Apr 2010 Location: Auckland, New Zealand More info | Aug 26, 2010 04:42 | #53 AdamJL wrote in post #10790964 And I see the lenses look different in the front.. new hood design? The only difference I see is that the area where the lens hood screws into is now black (was white). There were probably complaints about chipped paint, I know my 300 is showing damage in that area, and it's relatively new.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dalus Senior Member 284 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Sweden, Gothenburg More info | So I found a price on the new 400 2.8 here in Sweden its only 114900kr, about 16500$
LOG IN TO REPLY |
G-Tus Member 36 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2010 More info | Aug 26, 2010 05:49 | #55 So for $3000,- extra you get IS Mode 3 and not only AF, MF but also PF? Wonder what IS Mode 3 and PF will be....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
krb Cream of the Crop 8,818 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together More info | Aug 26, 2010 05:53 | #56 G-Tus wrote in post #10791242 So for $3000,- extra you get IS Mode 3 and not only AF, MF but also PF? Wonder what IS Mode 3 and PF will be.... Well, there's also that whole thing about increased sharpness, reduced weight, reduced MFD... -- Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bigrob Goldmember 1,431 posts Joined Dec 2004 Location: South Yorkshire, UK More info | Aug 26, 2010 06:24 | #57 Warehouseexpress in the UK are listing them as _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AdamJL Goldmember 4,365 posts Likes: 13 Joined May 2006 Location: 'Straya More info | Aug 26, 2010 06:54 | #58 bigrob wrote in post #10791354 Warehouseexpress in the UK are listing them as New 300 at £7499 and old one at £3599. New 400 at £11499 and old one at £6479. Yeah right. Now this did happen with the new 70-200 where they listed it at £2799 as soon as it was announced but by the time it was shipping it was down to something like £2499. It's currently at £1994. So I'd expect these to drop quite a lot in price before they are released and to have about a £1500 premium over the current one for at least a year. Jesus H Christ. They are trying to sell the 500 f/4 for 5.5k? I bought it brand new for 3.5k!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GMCPhotographics Goldmember More info | Aug 26, 2010 07:09 | #59 It's good to see the MFD is shortened on both lenses. As to the weight of the 400/2.8IIL, well the old one was Canon's heaviest lens. It was heavier than the 600L and 800L, so i think there was a lot of opportunity to cut some bulk. The 400mm f2.8 IS L was one of Canon's top performing lens. It's results with a 1.4x and 2x were amazing, but it certainly looks like this new lens has eclipsed the old one for IQ. The 300mm f2.8 IS L was again an excellent lens, but it's IQ did noticably drop with a 1.4tc and a more so with a 2x. If these MFT figures are to be belived then it looks like that is a thing of the past. It would be great to be able to use the 300L wide open with a 2X tc and still get L quality IQ out of it! Regards, Gareth Cooper GMCPhotographics
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BenJohnson Goldmember 1,811 posts Likes: 4 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Minneapolis, MN More info | Aug 26, 2010 07:45 | #60 Any word on the new hood designs? Canon's site now lists the "II" version of the hood: |Ben Johnson Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 526 guests, 157 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||