Super moon.
f8, 1/100, ISO 800, handheld.
5D3, 70-300L + 1.4 Kenko TC
100% crop
bobobird Cream of the Crop 5,138 posts Likes: 24 Joined Oct 2010 More info | Jun 26, 2013 00:20 | #5551 Super moon.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 27, 2013 22:14 | #5552 Both shot at:   20130624-183952_S9A3094.jpg by North Artworks, on Flickr 20130624-184556_S9A3149.jpg by North Artworks, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Immaculens creeped by the TF....  More info | Jun 27, 2013 23:12 | #5553 ...this is one narrow minded duck ~ alann wrote in post #16071528 20130624-183952_S9A3094.jpg by North Artworks, on Flickr[/IMG]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 27, 2013 23:23 | #5554 ^^^
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mccamli Goldmember  More info |
newporthomie Goldmember  4,175 posts Likes: 37 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Earth More info | Jun 28, 2013 11:47 | #5556
LOG IN TO REPLY |
newporthomie Goldmember 4,175 posts Likes: 37 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Earth More info | Jun 28, 2013 15:32 | #5558
LOG IN TO REPLY |
coffeeandpie Member  135 posts Joined Nov 2008 More info | Jun 28, 2013 16:01 | #5559 For someone who is NOT a pro, and interested in this lens for nature photos, travel etc., would the added cost of this lens be worth it compared to the much cheaper non-L version? I can be picky about IQ, and weather sealing is attractive, so that's why I am looking at it. New DSLR user (but old Canon A-1 film SLR user!)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ptcanon3ti Cream of the Crop  More info | Jun 28, 2013 16:04 | #5560 coffeeandpie wrote in post #16073791 For someone who is NOT a pro, and interested in this lens for nature photos, travel etc., would the added cost of this lens be worth it compared to the much cheaper non-L version? I can be picky about IQ, and weather sealing is attractive, so that's why I am looking at it. Would appreciate any thoughts. Thanks. I had the non-L version. This lens is vastly superior. IQ and IS are on a whole different level from the non-L. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 28, 2013 16:09 | #5561 I have had both. There is no way to compare these lenses. The L version is a world apart! Worth every penny. The L also takes the kenko 1.4 extremely well.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
coffeeandpie Member 135 posts Joined Nov 2008 More info | Thanks. Sounds like it is pretty great. New DSLR user (but old Canon A-1 film SLR user!)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ptcanon3ti Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 28, 2013 16:20 | #5563 ^ Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
moltengold Goldmember 4,296 posts Likes: 10 Joined Jul 2011 More info | Jun 28, 2013 16:26 | #5564 coffeeandpie wrote in post #16073791 For someone who is NOT a pro, and interested in this lens for nature photos, travel etc., would the added cost of this lens be worth it compared to the much cheaper non-L version? I can be picky about IQ, and weather sealing is attractive, so that's why I am looking at it. Would appreciate any thoughts. Thanks. i sold this lens | Canon EOS | and some canon lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Monkeymoss Goldmember  1,341 posts Likes: 1998 Joined Apr 2012 Location: Bristol, England More info | Jun 28, 2013 19:17 | #5565 coffeeandpie wrote in post #16073830 Thanks. Sounds like it is pretty great. I agree with the others Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1837 guests, 118 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
I am surprised at how well this lens works with the Kenko 300 PRO 1.4.
I've compared the l and the non-l side by side and in most cases the images are worlds apart.
