I did a one shot, split into 5 exposures (-2,-1,0,+1,+2) Then photomaxed and photoshopped. Any suggestions? Critiques please?
Piercephotographer Member 98 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: Philadelphia,Pa More info | Aug 26, 2010 23:43 | #1 I did a one shot, split into 5 exposures (-2,-1,0,+1,+2) Then photomaxed and photoshopped. Any suggestions? Critiques please? canon 7D gripped(wi-fi)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
J-Blake Great Googley Moogley! More info | Aug 27, 2010 07:24 | #2 Can you post up the 0 EV for camparison? Hard to see what you gained by going through all that. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Spike44 Goldmember 2,155 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Aug 27, 2010 07:36 | #3 Lighting and processing is superb....as is everything else I think but agree with above - why go to HDR?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I guess when I have this at full resolution, it really pops. I am still trying to figure how to properly fit my images into the size restrictions without comprimising quality. When I did the merge, it made everything sharper, and clearer, which made further post processing alot easier. here is both images: canon 7D gripped(wi-fi)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
brh986 Member 74 posts Joined Jun 2002 More info | Aug 27, 2010 10:48 | #5 Piercephotographer wrote in post #10797682 I did a one shot, split into 5 exposures (-2,-1,0,+1,+2) Then photomaxed and photoshopped. Any suggestions? Critiques please? how do you do that from just one base image?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Addicted2EOS Goldmember 1,774 posts Joined Jun 2009 More info | Aug 27, 2010 15:28 | #6 FYI: Photomatix will do most of that for you. Bring it in as a raw file and do a pseudo-HDR. It works nicely. Canon 40D and more lenses than my wife knows about...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
brh986 Member 74 posts Joined Jun 2002 More info | I just have the plugin but I'm thinking about getting the stand alone too. Is there an option that's just called pseudo-hdr?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MikeFairbanks Cream of the Crop 6,428 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2009 More info | Aug 27, 2010 18:52 | #8 I think it's a pretty sexy shot. I'm not really paying any attention to the rest. I guess that makes it a good shot. Thank you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2010 20:44 | #9 MikeFairbanks wrote in post #10802755 I think it's a pretty sexy shot. I'm not really paying any attention to the rest. I guess that makes it a good shot. Thank you....lol canon 7D gripped(wi-fi)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
IShootThings I thought I was special....... 2,032 posts Likes: 26 Joined May 2009 Location: North Cali More info | Aug 27, 2010 22:53 | #10 i think it turned out a lot better than the original. Canon 5D3, Canon XTI (IR converted), 24-70 f2.8L, 16-35 f4L, 50 1.4, 70-200 f2.8L, 100 2.8 macro, 430 ex & 580 exII speedlights.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dugcross Senior Member 879 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jan 2008 Location: St. Petersburg, Florida More info | I'm sure you would have noticed this while doing PP but didn't you realize that there was a seatbelt on her ruining the shot?! You need to pay more attention when doing the shoot for things like bugs flying into view, leaves falling in front of the lens or seatbelt falling onto the model. All of these can ruin a shot. Doug Cross
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is icebergchick 1119 guests, 162 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||