lowrider Goldmember  1,048 posts Likes: 291 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Tucson More info | Aug 31, 2010 12:47 | #1 Adobe Camera Raw has been updated to Version 6.2, and it now works with the 60D. It does not appear to be a beta release. This is really fast for Adobe. For the 7D it tooks months before the final update came out.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hawkeye60 Goldmember  2,079 posts Likes: 11 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Mesa, Arizona More info | Aug 31, 2010 12:53 | #2 Maybe the quick addition of the 60D is an indication of how it's not so much differnt from the 50D. It's a lens not a lense!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HyperYagami Goldmember 2,405 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA More info | Aug 31, 2010 13:28 | #3 hawkeye60 wrote in post #10823766  Maybe the quick addition of the 60D is an indication of how it's not so much differnt from the 50D. more like 7D, T2i.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HankScorpio Goldmember  2,700 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2007 Location: England, baby! More info | Aug 31, 2010 13:36 | #4 HyperYagami wrote in post #10823951 more like 7D Yep, almost identical. For the raw de-mosaicing* anyway. My collection of boxes with holes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tzalman Fatal attraction.  13,497 posts Likes: 213 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel More info | Aug 31, 2010 16:47 | #5 lowrider wrote in post #10823737 Adobe Camera Raw has been updated to Version 6.2, and it now works with the 60D. It does not appear to be a beta release. This is really fast for Adobe. For the 7D it tooks months before the final update came out. http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates/ Lou I think it was just a convenient coincidence for Adobe. They have a regular schedule of releasing a .x update every three months. The fact that the 60D was announced 5 days ago worked out well for them. OTOH, the fact that they apparently got their hands on a pre-production model or two indicates an unusual level of cooperation from Canon. But the conversions might be less than perfect. It has happened in the past that when Adobe rushed to get support for a new camera into a .x release the profiles were not very good, apparently because variation from one unit to another means that building good generic profiles requires testing many cameras. Elie / אלי
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 01, 2010 00:31 | #6 tzalman wrote in post #10825006 It has happened in the past that when Adobe rushed to get support for a new camera into a .x release the profiles were not very good, apparently because variation from one unit to another means that building good generic profiles requires testing many cameras. You're right. But, in the past, when the profiles were less than perfect, they announced beta releases of Camera Raw. 6.2 is not a beta release, so IMHO, they must be pretty sure of the profile.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1470 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
