Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 01 Sep 2010 (Wednesday) 10:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Battery Grip - why?

 
Pixels
Senior Member
Avatar
454 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Ireland
     
Sep 01, 2010 10:28 |  #1

I have never used a battery grip, so hence my question. I have 7D and 100-400L which I mainly use hand-held for bird shots, and which is heavy enough to carry. I wouldn't want the extra weight of a grip (at my age) - but maybe I'm totally missing something in which please pardon my ignorance.
The longer battery life isn't really an advantage for me for the type of work I do.
So you battery grip devotees out there - convince me!


Canon 24-105 L IS USM,
Canon 400mm L f5.6
Canon 7D, Canon 1.4 TCII
Canon 10-22, Canon 420EX speedlite,

Olympus OMD EM5, 20-40 f2.8 PRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Sep 01, 2010 10:31 |  #2

There are two major arguments for them, whether you buy them or not is a matter of preference. The first is having the shutter button on top in the vertical orientation, the second is that it balances better with long lenses and is more comfortable for people with large hands.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
Sep 01, 2010 10:32 |  #3

This is one of those subjects that seems to get debated on a monthly basis...


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HyperYagami
Goldmember
2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
     
Sep 01, 2010 10:33 |  #4

Pixels wrote in post #10829716 (external link)
I have never used a battery grip, so hence my question. I have 7D and 100-400L which I mainly use hand-held for bird shots, and which is heavy enough to carry. I wouldn't want the extra weight of a grip (at my age) - but maybe I'm totally missing something in which please pardon my ignorance.
The longer battery life isn't really an advantage for me for the type of work I do.
So you battery grip devotees out there - convince me!

battery grip is for people who dont mind the weight and need longer battery life, which you ruled both out.

some people like the extra weight to balance out the heavier lens and the ease of shooting portraits.

if those aren't your concerns then it's not for you, really no need to be "convinced".



5D3 and a few lens
es.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NinetyEight
"Banned for life"
Avatar
3,207 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Dorset - England
     
Sep 01, 2010 10:34 |  #5

If you take loads of portrait oriented shots you'll know why! After a time your wrist aches being twisted.

People with small cameras also fit them because they (mistakenly) think it looks 'cool' and 'professional' :rolleyes:


Kev

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PeyDay17
Goldmember
Avatar
1,333 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Mar 2010
     
Sep 01, 2010 10:36 as a reply to  @ HyperYagami's post |  #6

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=903118

I love my grip! I have big hands so it made my camera fit better and more comfortable in my hands. The added balance is well worth it too...


SmugMug (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Camera ­ Nerd
Senior Member
935 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Sep 01, 2010 10:39 |  #7

NinetyEight wrote in post #10829751 (external link)
If you take loads of portrait oriented shots you'll know why! After a time your wrist aches being twisted.

People with small cameras also fit them because they (mistakenly) think it looks 'cool' and 'professional' :rolleyes:

I would like a grip on my 7d cause it reminds me of a 1d camera. so i guess it makes it look more pro.
When I briefly used the 1d mark II I liked the fact that I could shoot portrait much much easier with my 70-200 lens then on my 7d.


canon 7d, canon 5d classic, 24-70 2.8 L, 70-200 2.8 (non-is) L, .
my flickr http://www.flickr.com/​photos/51827770@N04/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Sep 01, 2010 10:42 |  #8

How does your 100-400 feel on your 500D? It might balance better with a battery grip on the camera.

I use some even larger lenses and a battery grip definitely makes a difference with the overall balance and feel.

I've just used motor drives, film winders, power boosters and now WFT and battery grips on my cameras for 25+ years. I sort of feel uncomfortable using a camera without one (but sometimes do, to save size and weight when hiking, etc. I still prefer a camera with a removeable grip... Which tends to steer me away from the 1D series.)

For me one of the biggest things is vertical controls... I shoot a lot of verticals. Sometimes when taking 2000 to 4000 shots in a day, it's also nice to have an alternative means of tripping the shutter... Otherwise my and starts to cramp up from the sheer repetition.

I don't really need the extra batteries since I carry plenty of extras in a photo vest, plus a single batt with a full charge takes a lot of shots (I use the LCD minimally and never use the built-in flash, so hardly ever see a battery getting low).

But it's entirely up to you whether you use one or not. In no way is it a "mandatory" accessory.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Genome
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Sep 01, 2010 10:51 |  #9

here we go again


Flickr (external link)
In the bag:
Canon 500D Tamron 17-50 f2.8 Canon 70-200L f4 Jessops 2x converter Jessops 360 Flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Sep 01, 2010 10:53 |  #10

The common factors that go into a grip purchase have typically been:

1) Portrait shooting is easier over long period of times
2) More battery life (but with the newer age batteries and DSLR designs, this is less of an issue)
3) Better weighted feel with larger/heavier lenses
4) Ergonomically better for your hands (ie. those that buy a rebel may put a grip on to give it a large feel in their hands, and that grip is cheaper than moving to the xxD or xD line)
5) It looks so cool and professional
6) Adding a grip allows the use of the Canon E1 handstrap (but so does buying a plate like camdapter)

You have decide whether the purchase of a grip meets any of these in your situation.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben805
Goldmember
1,195 posts
Likes: 73
Joined Mar 2007
     
Sep 01, 2010 10:53 |  #11

1)the extra weight helped me balance the heavier and longer lens
2)double battery life, plus I can use six AA in emergency
3)extra room for my pinky
4)extra buttons helped me shoot in portrait orientation
5)now I can tie one end of the camera strap on the grip(right hand side) so it doesn't get in the way. Before the grip I hated the strap got all tangled up or dangling in my face when I shoot in portrait orientation.
6)I rather have the Quick release plate on the grip than scratching up the bottom of my camera


5D Mark III, Samyang 14mm, 35LII, 85L II, 100L IS Macro, 24-105L, 70-200L 2.8 IS II. 580EX, AB400, AB800.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artyman
Sleepless in Hampshire
Avatar
14,422 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 88
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Hampshire UK
     
Sep 01, 2010 10:56 |  #12

My Sigma 150-500 used to hang off my 350D, now with the larger and considerably heavier 7D I can't say that it has made one iota of difference to holding or balance and I suspect that adding a grip and an additional battery would only serve to make the combo even heavier. If I need more battery capacity a spare in the bag is much simpler in my opinion. As for pose value, not interested.


Art that takes you there. http://www.artyman.co.​uk (external link)
Ken
Canon 7D, 350D, 15-85, 18-55, 75-300, Cosina 100 Macro, Sigma 120-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Sep 01, 2010 10:56 |  #13

The grip doesn't allow for direct AF point control with the joystick in portrait orientation. That trumps every possible benefit to me. Besides, it's quicker to change to portrait if you don't have to take your hand off the camera, and the grips are huge FAT and chunky and don't feel nearly as nice as the REAL grip.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
Sep 01, 2010 11:13 |  #14

picturecrazy wrote in post #10829882 (external link)
The grip doesn't allow for direct AF point control with the joystick in portrait orientation.

Actually, it's your short thumb that prevents that. ;)


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
uOpt
Goldmember
Avatar
2,283 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Boston, MA, USA
     
Sep 01, 2010 11:16 |  #15

The main reason I got a battery grip for my 40D is that I can load it with AA batteries, which in turn I can buy at the next fuel station (just in case the 24 pack I carry around runs out).

Or in other words: I do something stupid and end up with all empty batteries out of the house I'm not screwed.

I usually run around with the grip mounted but only one battery inside.

i never use the vertical controls. The opteca grip I got misses some anyway.


My imagine composition sucks. I need a heavier lens.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

19,030 views & 0 likes for this thread, 75 members have posted to it.
Battery Grip - why?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1550 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.