Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 01 Sep 2010 (Wednesday) 22:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Help! T1i Continuous burst max 4fps

 
luckyshooter
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Sep 01, 2010 22:12 |  #1

My T1i will not shoot more than 4fps in continuous burst RAW+jpeg. Battery is charged, noise reduction is auto. I've used brand new Sandisk Extreme 30mb/s and Ultra 15mb/s. I've tried changing a few custom functions with no luck. any guidance would be highly appreciated.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Sep 01, 2010 22:19 |  #2

You're doing well, it's rated at 3.4fps.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mastamarek
Goldmember
Avatar
1,882 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
     
Sep 01, 2010 22:54 |  #3

The funny part I never understood is how these camera manufacturers can rate the FPS at 3.4 or 3.6578 or 2.984? Either it gets the full frame or not. lol. so the camera just stops after 3FPS and then just takes 4/10 of the next frame or what!? lol. werd


[Facebook® (external link)]
[imassmedia.pl (external link)]
[Flickr (external link)]
[My Blog (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FJ ­ LOVE
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,883 posts
Likes: 82
Joined Nov 2006
Location: barrie ont. ca
     
Sep 01, 2010 22:58 |  #4

Titus213 wrote in post #10833804 (external link)
You're doing well, it's rated at 3.4fps.


:lol:


DILLIGAF about your bicycle or your gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frostyeel
Junior Member
20 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Sep 01, 2010 23:03 |  #5

Mastamarek wrote in post #10834060 (external link)
The funny part I never understood is how these camera manufacturers can rate the FPS at 3.4 or 3.6578 or 2.984? Either it gets the full frame or not. lol. so the camera just stops after 3FPS and then just takes 4/10 of the next frame or what!? lol. werd

3.4 fps means each shot takes 1/3.4 or .29 seconds to take. So it takes .88 seconds to take 3 full shots.


Gear: Canon 20D, EF 50mm f1.8, EF-S 17-85mm f4-5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
luckyshooter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Sep 01, 2010 23:16 as a reply to  @ frostyeel's post |  #6

darn.. what I meant was it only takes 4 pictures in continuous burst mode.. pauses then takes a picture every second after that.. in Large jpeg it bursts for a very long time...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stealthy ­ Ninja
Cream of the Crop
14,387 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Mythical Tasmania (the one with lots of tall buildings in the semi-tropics, A.K.A. Hong Kong)
     
Sep 01, 2010 23:29 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

It's called a buffer (temporary storage on your camera that holds photo data before the card reads it off your camera).

Your card/camera can only do those 4 shots before the buffer gets full... it takes time to clear it out again. The faster the card the faster you can clear out your camera's buffer.

Which is why it slows down. It's very normal.

http://www.digital-slr-guide.com …oto-speed-and-buffer.html (external link)

If you want it to go faster for longer, then get a faster card.

The reason why jpegs can go for a long time is that each file is smaller and (therefore) takes up less space on your camera's buffer. ALSO this means they can be transfered to your card quicker... meaning the buffer doesn't fill up.

Hope this makes sense.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Sep 01, 2010 23:57 |  #8

I think it's rated at 9 frames of raw only before the buffer fills. The + jpg you are shooting is moving larger images than just raw.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stealthy ­ Ninja
Cream of the Crop
14,387 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Mythical Tasmania (the one with lots of tall buildings in the semi-tropics, A.K.A. Hong Kong)
     
Sep 02, 2010 00:56 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

Titus213 wrote in post #10834481 (external link)
I think it's rated at 9 frames of raw only before the buffer fills. The + jpg you are shooting is moving larger images than just raw.

Yes and the RAW+Jpeg will probably give him about 4 frames before the buffer fills.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,726 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 677
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Sep 02, 2010 01:36 as a reply to  @ Stealthy Ninja's post |  #10

The more expensive cameras have larger buffers, so they can keep on for a longer time, before they have to pause to flush the buffer to the card.
Well, sometimes it's not a longer time, since some of them are a lot faster, but at least more images before they pause.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paradiddleluke
Goldmember
Avatar
3,594 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Sep 02, 2010 02:00 |  #11

RAW only can do 9 frames, jpeg can pretty much keep going till 150 or something. but RAW+Jpeg takes alot of the buffer space


Website (external link) | Chicago Actor Headshots (external link) | Gear | Flickr (external link) | Blog (external link) | 500px (external link) | Youtube (external link) | Facebook (external link)
- Luke S -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KCY
Unlocked the hidden 117 point AF
Avatar
7,170 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2009
Location: I wish I knew...
     
Sep 02, 2010 02:02 |  #12

if its the same as the older xxxD's if you look in the viewfinder on the right side there should be a number there, for the xxxD I think this number goes to 9. This shows the remaining number of shots on your buffer so you should be able to compare RAW+JPEG, RAW, JPEG.


KC - The Circle of PoTN - Member of the UCPC
My Gear|My Smugmug (external link)|Pong

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kendon
Senior Member
Avatar
839 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: germany
     
Sep 02, 2010 02:31 |  #13

lol where is aravena, this is a double blunder ;)


7D, EF-S 10-22, EF-S 17-55, EF 70-200/4 IS, NiftyFifty, 580EXII, Σ 30 EX DC, Walimex 8mm Fisheye, MD Rokkor 50/1.4, BendyCam (external link), Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
luckyshooter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Sep 02, 2010 03:22 |  #14

Stealthy Ninja wrote in post #10834745 (external link)
Yes and the RAW+Jpeg will probably give him about 4 frames before the buffer fills.

So is a maximum of 4 continuous shots in RAW+jpeg on a Sandisk Extreme 30mb/s expected? acceptable?

I think I'm gonna have to go RAW only. :-(




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KCY
Unlocked the hidden 117 point AF
Avatar
7,170 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2009
Location: I wish I knew...
     
Sep 02, 2010 03:26 |  #15

luckyshooter wrote in post #10835176 (external link)
So is a maximum of 4 continuous shots in RAW+jpeg on a Sandisk Extreme 30mb/s expected? acceptable?

I think I'm gonna have to go RAW only. :-(

The shots go straight onto an internal buffer, which is then written onto the card.

The quicker your card means you can clear the buffer quicker but so far it is quite hard (impossible maybe?) for data to be written to the card quick enough that you can maintain 3.4fps indefinitely.

Therefore however fast your card you are still going to be limited to 4 shots.

if your camera could write infinitely quick then your card would be the bottleneck
if you had a card with infinite writing speed the camera wouldn't be able to write quick enough, therefore causing a bottleneck

either way you are unlikely to get more than 4 shots.

Higher model cameras can shoot for longer and with quicker fps is because they have a bigger internal buffer.


KC - The Circle of PoTN - Member of the UCPC
My Gear|My Smugmug (external link)|Pong

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,628 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Help! T1i Continuous burst max 4fps
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1082 guests, 143 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.