Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 17 Aug 2005 (Wednesday) 21:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Can lasers damage a camera sensor?

 
JSolie
Goldmember
Avatar
2,011 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Murrieta, California
     
Aug 18, 2005 17:56 as a reply to  @ post 723686 |  #16

PetersCreek wrote:
Anyway, back to the original question. A laser may or may not damage your camera's sensor. It'll depend on the laser power and wavelength, the focal length of the lens, etc...so my answer is "it depends." But camera sensors are replaceable. Eyes are not. Just food for thought.

Your post made my spine tingle :shock:

It reminds me of something I heard a while back:

Warning: Do not look at laser with remaining eye.

-- John


-- John
| Blog (external link) | Site (external link) | Gear |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BobL
Member
159 posts
Joined Apr 2005
     
Aug 18, 2005 18:38 as a reply to  @ JSolie's post |  #17

I did a bit of research on the sensitivity of CCD/CMOS to damage from lasers and, depending on sources they suggest that CCD/CMOS devices are between 10 and 1000 times less sensitive to damage than the human eye. The damage depends on things like wavelength and energy exposure (Joules/m^2).

In practice this means that (unless you have been operating your camera remotely or your sensor had a very brief powerful over exposure to a laser pulse while the mirror was up) if you have laser damage to your sensor you have almost certainly damaged your eye(s).

The lasers to really watch out for (if you can) are those that operate into the UV which you cannot always see. I have strong memories of a colleague working with a UV laser who didn't see anything but just hear the "pop" coming from his eyes. An investigation revealed he must have been accidentally exposed to a tiny reflection from the laser. He was in agony for weeks and 20 years later he still has a black spot and blurred grey "L" shape superimposed on everything he sees.

Shall we now talk about laser weapons and plans to defend people and systems against them?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10119
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Aug 18, 2005 21:37 |  #18

cringe.... "pop" ? ugh...


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPete
I am immune
Avatar
4,256 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 101
Joined Oct 2003
Location: Flat Bush, Auckland, New Zealand
     
Aug 18, 2005 23:19 as a reply to  @ CyberDyneSystems's post |  #19

Carrier lasers are bad news (those used in Telecoms), we had a point to point connection between two sites 50km apart over fibre, that laser came out so bright we had to put an attenuator (i.e. dark filter) on it to stop it burning out the receiver!

But then again, I doubt anyone will ever have issues with a camera and one of those.

PetersCreek, excellent explaination though!


Peter Lowden.
EOS R6 and assorted glass

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lancea
Senior Member
Avatar
720 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: New Zealand
     
Aug 19, 2005 01:13 |  #20

Some interesting pilots reports here http://asrs.arc.nasa.g​ov …line_issues/dl7​_laser.htm (external link). Not too surprising I guess. When I bought a tiny wee laser pointer I pointed it at the forested ridge opposite (at night) and could clearly see the red spot through binoculars. Just checked a map and the distance is around 2000 feet (600 metres). I want me one of those show-lasers! :mrgreen:


Olympus C-50 Zoom; Canon PowerShot G9; EOS 20D; EOS 5D Mark II
Canon EF-S 10-22; EF-S 18-55; EF 17-40 f/4L; EF 24-105 f/4[COLOR=red]L; EF 70-200 f/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sathi
Senior Member
Avatar
656 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Albany, NY
     
Aug 19, 2005 08:36 |  #21

You can now buy reasonably affordable green lasers over the internet. Seems kind of dangerous to me considering you don't need a license to buy one and the damage it can do.


20d / Tamron 28-75 2.8 / Canon 10-22 / Canon 100mm macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jadedbastard
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined Mar 2005
     
Aug 21, 2005 22:40 as a reply to  @ Sathi's post |  #22

I'm talking 3 phase, water cooled lasers shining directly into the camera while taking a shot. Usually i try to use the laser or light show as back fill on a shot; sometimes the laser will change sequence just as i take the shot and shine directly into the camera (.3sec shutter speed). It doesn't seem to immediately damage the camera just wondering if in time it will or not.

My S30 i didn't really care about but its safe to say I'm a bit paranoid about my SLR.


K750i, s30 and an extra battery!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Johnny ­ Thunder
Caution, Cant keep clothes on
Avatar
790 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Temecua, Ca
     
Aug 22, 2005 00:14 |  #23

If it was my camera, I'd limit the amount of time that happened.

Ever been hit in the eye with it? If you did, and it HURT, then I wouldnt do it EVER again, if not, I dont see a problem

-Johnny


T2i gripped with kit lenshttp://75.126.234.18/f​orum/showthread.php?t=​400860 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MiG82
Senior Member
319 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Aug 22, 2005 09:45 as a reply to  @ Sathi's post |  #24

Sathi wrote:
You can now buy reasonably affordable green lasers over the internet. Seems kind of dangerous to me considering you don't need a license to buy one and the damage it can do.

If you're thinking of the 5 mW green pointers then the damage is a only a concern for extended viewing. It's pretty impossible to get sufficient exposure if you aren't a willing participant (who the heck would stare into a stationary beam?). My information comes from this page: http://repairfaq.ece.d​rexel.edu/sam/lasersaf​.htm#safcils (external link)


Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling in the mud with a pig. After a few hours you realise that he likes it.
20D Σ: 10-20 EX, 24-70 EX, 70-300 APO, 100-300 F4 EX, 1.4x EX Canon: 50 F1.8, G3, BG-E2 Manfrotto: 685B, 486RC2 Pentax: Spotmatic II, Super Takumar 50 F1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sathi
Senior Member
Avatar
656 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Albany, NY
     
Aug 22, 2005 14:53 as a reply to  @ MiG82's post |  #25

MiG82 wrote:
If you're thinking of the 5 mW green pointers then the damage is a only a concern for extended viewing. It's pretty impossible to get sufficient exposure if you aren't a willing participant (who the heck would stare into a stationary beam?). My information comes from this page: http://repairfaq.ece.d​rexel.edu/sam/lasersaf​.htm#safcils (external link)

Indeed. The article even pointed out that damage from a green laser is less likely than a red one because it appears brighter and will more quickly trigger a blink turn away reflex.

However the article is speaking of 5mw green lasers which it says is the max legal limit. WHich is strange because this place which ships from new hampshire is selling a 100mw green laser.

http://www.amazing1.co​m/laser3.htm (external link)

They even have this disclaimer:

These lasers cannot be used around pets or animals as you could cause them serious eye damage. The power of the 100 milliwatt system is easily demonstrated by pointing the laser at a flat black surface and note the impact point burning and smoking. Obviously this laser is very hazardous and requires protective eyewear and extreme caution when using for laboratory experimentation.

The article also says off the shelf green lasers are very easy to modify to 50mw or more and there are guides on the net on how to do it. Now I can finaly build that death ray I always wanted :)


20d / Tamron 28-75 2.8 / Canon 10-22 / Canon 100mm macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Johnny ­ Thunder
Caution, Cant keep clothes on
Avatar
790 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Temecua, Ca
     
Aug 22, 2005 15:14 |  #26

LOL, did you see the Green Laser ray gun?

Shoots a highly visible ray of green light!!!
Easily Concealable with range over 10 miles!!

Only $10! Finally, I'll control the world! No one can stand up to my Laser ray gun!

LMFAO

-Johnny


T2i gripped with kit lenshttp://75.126.234.18/f​orum/showthread.php?t=​400860 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nosedrops
Hatchling
1 post
Joined May 2007
     
May 04, 2007 05:33 |  #27

jadedbastard wrote in post #722295 (external link)
I have a S30 that has had a fairly rough life and now hopelessly over exposes when set to any of the auto settings.

I realise it could be a number of things but specifically I'm wondering can lasers damage the sensor on compact and/or D SLR shots? (difference being the sensor is always exposed in a compact).

Could continual/repeated exposure to event lasers cause damage to a sensor or camera?

YES very easily. I have a 75mW green laser pointer (www.dragonlasers.com (external link)) that i often take photos of. The beam has hit the sensor in my digital and now there are pixels missing in my photos :evil:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,579 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Can lasers damage a camera sensor?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1883 guests, 106 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.