One of the main reasons I'm thinking of getting a 1D MKIV is reportedly less noise at higher ISOs than my MKII.
Is it fair to expect a two stop improvement, say going from 800 to 3200 and get similar noise?
Sep 05, 2010 13:31 | #1 One of the main reasons I'm thinking of getting a 1D MKIV is reportedly less noise at higher ISOs than my MKII. Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 05, 2010 16:39 | #2 llama. Canon 5D Mark IV | 16-35mm f/4L | 85mm f/1.4L | 100-400L II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TaDa ...as cool as Perry  6,742 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: New York More info | Sep 05, 2010 17:52 | #3 Well, the 1D3 is a good stop better than the 1D2, and then the 1D4 is a good stop better than the 1D3, so yeah, you're looking at around 2 stops better noise handling. Name is Peter and here is my gear:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1444 guests, 139 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
