Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 06 Sep 2010 (Monday) 20:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Tokina 11-16mm on a FF body

 
MOkoFOko
nut impotent and avoiding Geoff
Avatar
19,889 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
     
Sep 06, 2010 20:35 |  #1

The 11-16 is marketed as an APS-C-specific lens... so exactly how will it perform on a Full-Frame body, assuming I eventually go for a 5d?

How do these 3rd party APS-C-only lens work anyhow? Do they safely mount on FF bodies (unlike EF-S mount lens), yet provide poor performance?


My Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
n1as
Goldmember
2,330 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Salem, OR
     
Sep 06, 2010 21:09 |  #2

When I went to the 1D and 5D, I sold my 11-16. Big mistake. This weekend I bought it back. I did some serious testing and here's what I found.

5D - Full coverage at 16mm. Less vignetting than the 17-40 at 17mm. Less barrel distortion than the 17-40. Corner sharpness is a tad better than the 17-40.

1D - Full coverage from 16mm to about 12.5 mm.

This lens is a remarkable lens. Rather than viewing it as a zoom, I now view it as a variable focal length prime lens that will give 16m equivalent coverage on FF, 1.3 and 1.6 crop.

On, one area where the 17-40 kicks the 11-16's butt is on flare. The Tokina flares badly when shooting towards the sun.


- Keith
http://darwinphoto.zen​folio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
taxsux
Senior Member
392 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Sep 06, 2010 21:22 |  #3

n1as wrote in post #10862066 (external link)
5D - Full coverage at 16mm. Less vignetting than the 17-40 at 17mm. Less barrel distortion than the 17-40. Corner sharpness is a tad better than the 17-40.

Nice, basically it's a 16mm 2.8 prime. Sharp. :D

Does it hit the mirror?

I'm very keen on this lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pkphotography
Member
199 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Johnston, RI
     
Sep 06, 2010 21:24 |  #4

n1as wrote in post #10862066 (external link)
When I went to the 1D and 5D, I sold my 11-16. Big mistake. This weekend I bought it back. I did some serious testing and here's what I found.

5D - Full coverage at 16mm. Less vignetting than the 17-40 at 17mm. Less barrel distortion than the 17-40. Corner sharpness is a tad better than the 17-40.

1D - Full coverage from 16mm to about 12.5 mm.

This lens is a remarkable lens. Rather than viewing it as a zoom, I now view it as a variable focal length prime lens that will give 16m equivalent coverage on FF, 1.3 and 1.6 crop.

On, one area where the 17-40 kicks the 11-16's butt is on flare. The Tokina flares badly when shooting towards the sun.


This is very good to know :)


Canon 5D Mark III + BG-E11 | Panasonic GX7 | Sony A7R (on order)
Canon 24-70L II | Canon 70-200L IS II | Canon 35L | Canon 40 STM | Canon 85L II
Panasonic 14-42 | Olympus 17 | Olympus 45 | Olympus 75 | Olympus 40-150
M-Hexanon 50 | Jupiter-8 50 | Nikon 105 AIS
Other Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MOkoFOko
THREAD ­ STARTER
nut impotent and avoiding Geoff
Avatar
19,889 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
     
Sep 06, 2010 21:35 |  #5

n1as wrote in post #10862066 (external link)
When I went to the 1D and 5D, I sold my 11-16. Big mistake. This weekend I bought it back. I did some serious testing and here's what I found.

5D - Full coverage at 16mm. Less vignetting than the 17-40 at 17mm. Less barrel distortion than the 17-40. Corner sharpness is a tad better than the 17-40.

1D - Full coverage from 16mm to about 12.5 mm.

This lens is a remarkable lens. Rather than viewing it as a zoom, I now view it as a variable focal length prime lens that will give 16m equivalent coverage on FF, 1.3 and 1.6 crop.

On, one area where the 17-40 kicks the 11-16's butt is on flare. The Tokina flares badly when shooting towards the sun.

Ahh, so it performs admirably on 1x and 1.3x bodies--that is good to know. I don't know why Tokina's own description says it's specifically designed for APS-C bodies...

And yes, flare appears to be the sticking point in every review I've read for the 11-16... otherwise it's wonderful! I just ordered one on ebay from Kenmorecamera for $630 shipped with a Hoya uv filter... currently 4% mr rebate bucks on ebay this week, plus the 3-year warranty and additional 1-year Visa warranty... I couldn't hold out any longer :)


My Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hieu1004
Goldmember
Avatar
3,579 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Seattle
     
Sep 06, 2010 21:49 |  #6

n1as wrote in post #10862066 (external link)
When I went to the 1D and 5D, I sold my 11-16. Big mistake. This weekend I bought it back. I did some serious testing and here's what I found.

5D - Full coverage at 16mm. Less vignetting than the 17-40 at 17mm. Less barrel distortion than the 17-40. Corner sharpness is a tad better than the 17-40.

1D - Full coverage from 16mm to about 12.5 mm.

This lens is a remarkable lens. Rather than viewing it as a zoom, I now view it as a variable focal length prime lens that will give 16m equivalent coverage on FF, 1.3 and 1.6 crop.

On, one area where the 17-40 kicks the 11-16's butt is on flare. The Tokina flares badly when shooting towards the sun.

This is very good to know, thanks for the info.

MOkoFOko wrote in post #10862193 (external link)
Ahh, so it performs admirably on 1x and 1.3x bodies--that is good to know. I don't know why Tokina's own description says it's specifically designed for APS-C bodies...

And yes, flare appears to be the sticking point in every review I've read for the 11-16... otherwise it's wonderful! I just ordered one on ebay from Kenmorecamera for $630 shipped with a Hoya uv filter... currently 4% mr rebate bucks on ebay this week, plus the 3-year warranty and additional 1-year Visa warranty... I couldn't hold out any longer :)

You will love the lens - it's great and very sharp. Kenmore Camera is where I purchased the lens as well, but I did it in person - it is actually down the street from me.


-Hieu
Gear | Blog (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sol95
Senior Member
661 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Sep 06, 2010 21:54 |  #7

Someone posted some photos of the 11-16 token on a full frame (5d, I think) about a year ago. I also had this lens when i had a crop camera and tried it on my 5dii. The mirror doesn't hit the lens at all, but ended up selling it as I really didn't need what was effectively a 16/2.8 prime.


Bodies: 5D mk III
Lenses: 50 f/1.2L | 85 f/1.2L II | 100 f/2.8L IS Macro | 17-40 f/4.0L | 24-70 f/2.8L II | 70-200 f/2.8L IS II
Accessories: 430EX II | TC-80N3 M43: Olympus E-PM1 | Olympus m.Zuiko 14-42 II R | Panasonic 14 f/2.5 | Panasonic 20 f/1.8 | Olympus m.Zuiko 45 f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Sep 06, 2010 21:56 |  #8

sol95 wrote in post #10862277 (external link)
Someone posted some photos of the 11-16 token on a full frame (5d, I think) about a year ago. I also had this lens when i had a crop camera and tried it on my 5dii. The mirror doesn't hit the lens at all, but ended up selling it as I really didn't need what was effectively a 16/2.8 prime.

especially when canon sells a 16-35L f2.8 zoom :D.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
taxsux
Senior Member
392 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Sep 06, 2010 21:57 |  #9

I still have a 40d and 5d, this lens could only work for me :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MOkoFOko
THREAD ­ STARTER
nut impotent and avoiding Geoff
Avatar
19,889 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
     
Sep 06, 2010 22:05 |  #10

hieu1004 wrote in post #10862256 (external link)
This is very good to know, thanks for the info.

You will love the lens - it's great and very sharp. Kenmore Camera is where I purchased the lens as well, but I did it in person - it is actually down the street from me.

Small world. I hadn't heard of them prior to this, but did some research when I tried to confirm that they were authorized retailers. Their response was speedy and courteous as well--seems like a good store. Out of curiosity, how much did you pay for it instore?

sol95 wrote in post #10862277 (external link)
Someone posted some photos of the 11-16 token on a full frame (5d, I think) about a year ago. I also had this lens when i had a crop camera and tried it on my 5dii. The mirror doesn't hit the lens at all, but ended up selling it as I really didn't need what was effectively a 16/2.8 prime.

At least say 11mm f/2.8 prime--that's much more interesting on a ff than 16mm :)
Edit: Nevermind, now I understand the reasoning behind your statement.

ed rader wrote in post #10862288 (external link)
especially when canon sells a 16-35L f2.8 zoom :D.

ed rader

But it's expensiveeeeeeeee :) More than 2x the price of the Tokina, and not in the same range on a FF or crop for that matter...


My Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hieu1004
Goldmember
Avatar
3,579 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Seattle
     
Sep 06, 2010 22:09 |  #11

MOkoFOko wrote in post #10862322 (external link)
Small world. I hadn't heard of them prior to this, but did some research when I tried to confirm that they were authorized retailers. Their response was speedy and courteous as well--seems like a good store. Out of curiosity, how much did you pay for it instore?

I paid $599, but with tax - so you got a pretty good deal.


-Hieu
Gear | Blog (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Sep 06, 2010 22:13 |  #12

https://photography-on-the.net …5246&highlight=​11-16mm+ff


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MOkoFOko
THREAD ­ STARTER
nut impotent and avoiding Geoff
Avatar
19,889 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
     
Sep 06, 2010 22:19 |  #13

Thanks, very helpful read. I used my google-fu without any truly useful hits. I didn't think of searching within the forums here.


My Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Sep 06, 2010 22:21 |  #14

MOkoFOko wrote in post #10862387 (external link)
Thanks, very helpful read. I used my google-fu without any truly useful hits. I didn't think of searching within the forums here.

yeah it's good because the images show you exactly what you get, i think there are other samples...that was just the easiest for me to find


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ohnoes
Member
117 posts
Joined Aug 2010
     
Sep 06, 2010 22:23 |  #15

n1as wrote in post #10862066 (external link)
When I went to the 1D and 5D, I sold my 11-16. Big mistake. This weekend I bought it back. I did some serious testing and here's what I found.

5D - Full coverage at 16mm. Less vignetting than the 17-40 at 17mm. Less barrel distortion than the 17-40. Corner sharpness is a tad better than the 17-40.

1D - Full coverage from 16mm to about 12.5 mm.

This lens is a remarkable lens. Rather than viewing it as a zoom, I now view it as a variable focal length prime lens that will give 16m equivalent coverage on FF, 1.3 and 1.6 crop.

On, one area where the 17-40 kicks the 11-16's butt is on flare. The Tokina flares badly when shooting towards the sun.

Would you stick with using the 11-16 on a FF then? I had the idea of keeping my 11-16 when I upgrade to FF so that I didn't have to sell it and get something else.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,723 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Tokina 11-16mm on a FF body
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
705 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.