hah, thats funny, I do shoot RAW mostly but I shoot JPG as well, I like L's but I'm not fanatic, If I'll be able get 300 2.8L it makes me really happy, if I'll get 1200 L I gonna be on heaven........j/k .... yes we all prefer to have the best, best cam, best computer, best lenses, best cars.......... it is human nature, to desire the best, the sad part is that in reality there are some incredible photographers who are not aiming to have all L's and can create awesome pics without all this stuff and in the same time there are some who own Mark II Ds with several L's and the only mode they use is Full Auto ... that is funnny... just saw one few days ago...sad and funny
A pro has a different vision, a completely different purpose for their photography. My satisfaction for what I do probably has as much focus on my equipment as taking pictures. Some pros may not care what they are shooting with but those that can afford it will have the very best.
Long ago in my lfe as a professional musician I played guitar on a crappy plank of wood excuse for a guitar. When I was able to afford the best I got it. Did I play better. Maybe not but it is much nicer to play on a fine instrument than a peice of crap. That was just my desire to have better equipment. I never made more money having better equipment but I enjoyed myself more. I don't know if pro photographers think the same way but I can't imagine any full fledge serious pro would not own the very best equipment possible.




