![]() | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script |
First time posting.
Just a little something.
Be nice!! (Kidding, I expect honest critiques.)

Thanks
JCOphoto Member 192 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: Portland More info | Sep 12, 2010 16:05 | #1
First time posting. Just a little something. Be nice!! (Kidding, I expect honest critiques.) ![]() Thanks ~ Jessica O || Portland, OR Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks. I think it does draw the eyes in nicely. ~ Jessica O || Portland, OR Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Deeners Member 161 posts Joined Mar 2009 More info | makes me wonder how long the car has been there...with all the plants growing through the car. I like it. "Of all the things you wear, your expression is the most important."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
corkneyfonz Goldmember 2,477 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2009 Location: United Kingdom More info | Sep 12, 2010 21:29 | #6 I would be inclined to b/w convert and lighten the foiliage for a pseudo Infra red effect. Lots of potential here.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ToddLambert I don't like titles More info | Sep 12, 2010 22:23 | #7 I don't think I like the vignetting on this at all. If you were to have vignetting on it, I would make it much less in total, and definitely much less symmetrical and round. I'd just take a soft brush and dab it into the corners... get the same effect without making it look cheap or fake.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BT180 Hatchling 2 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Sep 12, 2010 22:50 | #8 I'm new to all this too and I realise it's not the picture itself but I'm distracted by your watermark. I think it needs to be transparent or smaller or both.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 13, 2010 00:10 | #9 BT180 wrote in post #10897623 I'm new to all this too and I realise it's not the picture itself but I'm distracted by your watermark. I think it needs to be transparent or smaller or both. I felt like slapping a huge watermark, smack dab in the middle, after reading all the threads about pic snatchers. lol ~ Jessica O || Portland, OR Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
24alpha Goldmember 1,031 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Sep 13, 2010 05:25 | #10 Todd Lambert wrote in post #10897476 I don't think I like the vignetting on this at all. If you were to have vignetting on it, I would make it much less in total, and definitely much less symmetrical and round. I'd just take a soft brush and dab it into the corners... get the same effect without making it look cheap or fake. +1 on the vignetting. Less is more. maybe reducing the saturation might produce some better results as well.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
darrylhopkins Member 144 posts Joined Mar 2010 Location: Norfolk, UK More info | Sep 13, 2010 11:05 | #11 I like the image, but it's nice in BW as suggeted, but a big fan of the vignetting, live and let live There ain't gonna be enough time to capture all the beautiful thing in the world, but I'm getting them one by one...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 13, 2010 14:12 | #12 I love this one just the way it is. ~ Jessica O || Portland, OR Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 13, 2010 14:40 | #13 Not a fan of the vignetting and looks like it needs to be cropped
LOG IN TO REPLY |
crimsonblack Goldmember 2,052 posts Likes: 6 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada More info | Sep 17, 2010 23:45 | #14 Nice shot. It's amazing how much money people let rust in a lot or field somewhere. Some of these old car parts are worth a mint - original part is worth so much more than a reproduction part. You see all these great images of rusted out abandoned machines and I start to wonder the riches left waist a way. | 7D Gripped | 28-135 f/3.5-4.6 | 50 f/1.8 || --- Sony F717 digital (infrared) --- Bunch of Film Stuff:- | Nikon & Nikkormat | 50/28/70-150/400 | B & J 4x5 large format | Mamiya C220 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jfbrodeur Member 58 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Montréal, Canada More info | Sep 18, 2010 15:31 | #15 i like subject. The only thing that bother me is that you look far from the subject and only used the zoom instead of getting closer. Maybe it was not possible, in that case i like the photo lol. Canon EOS 7D with BG-E7, 16-35mm f2.8L, 70-200mm F2.8L, 580EXII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1214 guests, 172 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||