Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 14 Sep 2010 (Tuesday) 07:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Yongnuo Speedlite Transmitter ST-E2

 
JerryA
Member
111 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Sep 14, 2010 07:56 |  #1

Well, their available, but a tad more expensive than what James at Yongnuo had told me.

Big question is whether it can control their own ETTL flashes ( 468 )???

For the price of one new Canon 580 II. up here in Canada, you could get 3 ETTL 468s, a set of the new RT triggers and this controller !!! + or - a bit, haven't worked it out exactly, but the 580 is 500.00+ then add 13% tax

I have a 7D, but can't seem to do wireless from the on board flash in ETTL with the 468 ( as I would be able to do with most of Canon's later model flashes ), so will try and find out it this new gizmo can control the 468s wirelessly and/or their 560s in manual. Link to their website, but there is more info at the Eeekbay listing.
http://www.hkyongnuo.c​om …_rsAll=9&catego​ry=1.Flash (external link)

The link http://stores.ebay.com …gnuophotoequipm​ent?_rdc=1 (external link)

I'm assuming this is not a RT unit, I'm kinda new to all this off camera flash stuff. Hope the info is of some use to the forum, I am in no way promoting their products, just info (+:

Maybe a more knowledgeable Flash user can add an opinion about what they think. Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
brillant
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Sep 14, 2010 12:32 |  #2

YONGNUO ST-E2 can't use with YN560. 560 have no TTL.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JerryA
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
111 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Sep 14, 2010 13:42 |  #3

brillant wrote in post #10907253 (external link)
YONGNUO ST-E2 can't use with YN560. 560 have no TTL.

Right you are, thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
[Hyuni]
Goldmember
Avatar
1,186 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Dec 2008
Location: CHiCAGO
     
Sep 14, 2010 14:38 |  #4

whoa, $159 is a lot more expensive!
I was thinking of picking one up mainly to use as a cheap focus assist beam source, but no thanks!


6D Rokinon 14 f/2.8 l EF 35 ƒ1.4L l EF 135 ƒ2.0L l EF 70-200 ƒ2.8L IS II l YN460 l 580EX II l Flick'd (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HungV
Member
201 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Oregon
     
Sep 14, 2010 15:01 |  #5

I would spend $70.00 more for real Canon, peace of mind.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Knary50
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Sep 17, 2010 11:27 |  #6

Acorrding to their website there are some improvements in range and adding group C control though so it might be worth it. I just picked up a Canon version 2 months ago slightly used for $150 so i won't be testing. I am more interested in the EX clone flashes.
Also uses 2 AA 1.6V batteries rather than 2cr5 6V which could save a few bucks and time




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liupublic
Goldmember
1,114 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Tempe AZ
     
Sep 17, 2010 12:42 |  #7

@ $150 price range, it's getting near the range of Pixel Knight. Makes it difficult to swallop. Pixel knight w/ two receivers + 1 transmitter is ~$250 but it's RF instead of IR.


Still learning
Nikon D750, Sigma 24-105OS, 105mm 2.8g micro VR, Tamron 70-300VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xcel730
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: New York
     
Oct 06, 2010 16:24 as a reply to  @ liupublic's post |  #8

I wanted to get one of these, but honestly, I could pick up a used Canon ST-E2 for around the same price.


________
[Gear List]
Quote: If the grass is always greener on the other side, then maybe you should start working on your own grass.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rhys216
Goldmember
1,814 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Oxfordshire
     
Oct 06, 2010 16:47 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

xcel730 wrote in post #11047280 (external link)
I wanted to get one of these, but honestly, I could pick up a used Canon ST-E2 for around the same price.

Isn't the trigger reliability of the Yongnuo supposed to be better than the unreliable ST-E2?
At the end of the day, I don't give a damn about brand name, so I don't see why getting a 'Canon' branded ST-E2 for 'only' $70 more for a worse product is of ANY real benefit, other than the fact it's got a 'Canon' badge on it, or is the Yongnuo worse in other areas?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Oct 06, 2010 18:20 |  #10

Hasn't it already been stated that the ETTL flash units can't be tripped by the 7Ds ETTL capability? What makes anyone think that they didn't get it right with the flash but they could with the flash controller?


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Oct 06, 2010 18:22 |  #11

rhys216 wrote in post #11047400 (external link)
Isn't the trigger reliability of the Yongnuo supposed to be better than the unreliable ST-E2?
At the end of the day, I don't give a damn about brand name, so I don't see why getting a 'Canon' branded ST-E2 for 'only' $70 more for a worse product is of ANY real benefit, other than the fact it's got a 'Canon' badge on it, or is the Yongnuo worse in other areas?

I wasn't aware that the ST-E2 was 'unreliable'. It doesn't work well in bright light which is stated in the manual I believe. Is that the unreliable you are talking about?


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rhys216
Goldmember
1,814 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Oxfordshire
     
Oct 06, 2010 18:35 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

Titus213 wrote in post #11047831 (external link)
I wasn't aware that the ST-E2 was 'unreliable'. It doesn't work well in bright light which is stated in them manual I believe. Is that the unreliable you are talking about?

Yeh, strangely I had someone on ebay ask me a question about some TR-332's I had for sale, and they said the reason they were looking at the Pixels was because the ST-E2 was no good outside when doing weddings.

The below diagrams illustrate the differences between the two ST-E2's according to Yongnuo.
If they are indeed accurate, and the Yongnuo didn't have any glaring flaws I would personally opt for the Yongnou even if it was the same price as the Canon.


IMAGE: http://imgs.inkfrog.com/pix/yespainting/ST-E212.jpg

IMAGE: http://imgs.inkfrog.com/pix/yespainting/ST-E211.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Oct 06, 2010 20:11 |  #13

So the ST-E2 works according to its specs - that's reliable. The Yongnuo has different specs - on paper.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Oct 06, 2010 20:42 |  #14

[Hyuni wrote:
='[Hyuni];10908002']wh​oa, $159 is a lot more expensive!
I was thinking of picking one up mainly to use as a cheap focus assist beam source, but no thanks!

Using any ST-E2 (Canon or Yongnuo) for focus assist is not really a good idea unless you now exactly what you're doing..

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=791160


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rhys216
Goldmember
1,814 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Oxfordshire
     
Oct 06, 2010 20:52 |  #15
bannedPermanent ban

Titus213 wrote in post #11048455 (external link)
So the ST-E2 works according to its specs - that's reliable.

Ok... then it's spec's are inadequate in my opinion, and I seriously can't understand why a company like Canon hasn't built an RF based triggering system instead of continuing with this inferior IR ST-E2 based solution.
At least the Yongnuo has a more 'usable' spec if the chart holds true.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,172 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Yongnuo Speedlite Transmitter ST-E2
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1688 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.