Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 15 Sep 2010 (Wednesday) 16:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Did I balance the light ok?

 
ni$mo350
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,011 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
Sep 15, 2010 16:47 |  #1

I'm starting to incorporate OCF into my portraits and I'm having the hardest time balancing the light on the subject and exposing the background properly. here's some samples of my parents taken yesterday at my bro's farewell party. Any insight will be helpful.

1)

IMAGE: http://i578.photobucket.com/albums/ss222/goddardca/IMG_9620.jpg

2) I know I needed stop down a bit more since he's oof but any tips on the lighting?
IMAGE: http://i578.photobucket.com/albums/ss222/goddardca/IMG_9615.jpg

3)
IMAGE: http://i578.photobucket.com/albums/ss222/goddardca/IMG_9613.jpg

4)
IMAGE: http://i578.photobucket.com/albums/ss222/goddardca/IMG_9622.jpg

-Chris-Website (external link)|| (external link)Facebook (external link)|| My Flickr (external link)|| Follow me!!! 500px (external link) || (external link) 5D mkii || 35L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS MKII || My bank account hates you all :cry:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GorgeShooter
Goldmember
Avatar
1,422 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
     
Sep 15, 2010 17:17 |  #2

It's not bad but the hot spots on their cheeks and glasses is distracting.


1DX | 5D MkII (gripped)
16-35 f/2.8L | 24-70 f/2.8L | 24-105 f/4L IS | 70-200 f/4L IS | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS | 24 f/3.5L TS-E | 45 f/2.8 TS-E | 40 f/2.8 Pancake | 15 f/2.8 Fisheye | Tokina 100 f/2.8 Macro | Canon 1.4x TC | 580 EX II | 430 EX II | Manfrotto 055CXPRO4 | Kirk BH-1
:: Smugmug :: (external link) | :: Photography BLOG :: (external link) | :: Workshops and Classes (external link) ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ni$mo350
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,011 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
Sep 15, 2010 17:20 |  #3

GorgeShooter wrote in post #10916287 (external link)
It's not bad but the hot spots on their cheeks and glasses is distracting.

Ahhh yea the glasses were a problem. Any suggestions on them not showing up besides trying to remove it in post? The cheeks are going to shine no matter what. Asians have oily skin naturally on top of the moisturizer she put on so there was no hope for that... if there is then I'm all ears :)


-Chris-Website (external link)|| (external link)Facebook (external link)|| My Flickr (external link)|| Follow me!!! 500px (external link) || (external link) 5D mkii || 35L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS MKII || My bank account hates you all :cry:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
moeronn
Goldmember
2,516 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: SoCal
     
Sep 15, 2010 17:35 |  #4

The lighting balance looks pretty good. As mentioned the reflection and highlights are the main issue. A couple of things that should help minimize these:

For the glasses reflection, move the light further away from the camera and/or have them angle their faces more. Doing this should adjust the reflection so that it is not seem from the camera.

For the shiny skin, have them apply some makeup and/or use those absorbant papers. The papers can be found at Victoria's Secret and I'm sure other places.


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ni$mo350
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,011 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
Sep 15, 2010 18:05 |  #5

Thanks! That helps a lot. I'll be sure to pick some up the next time I'm at the mall.


-Chris-Website (external link)|| (external link)Facebook (external link)|| My Flickr (external link)|| Follow me!!! 500px (external link) || (external link) 5D mkii || 35L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS MKII || My bank account hates you all :cry:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Psyecat
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Jul 2010
     
Sep 15, 2010 18:07 as a reply to  @ moeronn's post |  #6

I have never tried it, but www.Strobist.com (external link) suggests that you have the subject look away from the flash to avoid the glare.

http://strobist.blogsp​ot.com …lighting-for-glasses.html (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ni$mo350
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,011 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
Sep 15, 2010 18:10 |  #7

Thanks Psyecat, I'm going through strobist now and will re-read that post.


-Chris-Website (external link)|| (external link)Facebook (external link)|| My Flickr (external link)|| Follow me!!! 500px (external link) || (external link) 5D mkii || 35L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS MKII || My bank account hates you all :cry:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
corkneyfonz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,477 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
     
Sep 15, 2010 20:08 |  #8

The lighting seems relatively diffused and balanced its just as per everyone else's comments, the flash hot spots.....


My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Sep 15, 2010 22:16 |  #9

I would like to see a little more difference between the left and right. A 1:2 ratio works well for a shot like this. Some light meters will calculate the ratio for you.


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vk2gwk
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,360 posts
Gallery: 332 photos
Likes: 1836
Joined Jun 2009
Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia
     
Sep 16, 2010 02:42 |  #10

I think the light is pretty good. Was this a bare flash or did you use a diffuser. The more diffused the light the less problems you have with hot spots.


My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
Image Editing is allowed. Please explain what you did!
Canon R5, R,, RF24-105/1:4 + RF70-200mm F/2.8 + RF15-35mm F/2.8 + 50mm 1.4 USM + Sigma 150-600mm Sports + RF100mm F/2.8 + GODOX V860 IIC+ 430EX + YN568EXII, triggers, reflectors, umbrellas and some more bits and pieces...
Photos on: Flickr! (external link) and on my own web site. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Krapo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,018 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Brussels, Belgium
     
Sep 16, 2010 03:33 |  #11

I like #4 best because of the separation effect that the flash provides.


François
---
40D + grip, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 24-70 f/2.8L, 17-40 f/4L, 50 f/1.4, 580 EX II
www.casualvision.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SJPHoto
Senior Member
Avatar
487 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
     
Sep 16, 2010 04:00 |  #12

it looks a little fuzzy. what is your aperture? when using flash, try getting away from wide open. Shoot around f/5.6 or something. The color on the first 3 are WAY too red. I like #4 the best. U can easily PS out that glare.


SJP WEBSITE (external link) Follow me on TWITTER (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photographicd
Member
115 posts
Joined Jun 2010
     
Sep 16, 2010 09:31 |  #13

Your images are all pretty much tack sharp.. Would you mind sharing the camera/lens/settings you used?


5D MkII - Sigma 50mm f1.4 Prime, 24-105mm f2.8, 70-300 f4 IS - Pocketwizard MiniTT1, 2xFlexTT5 - 1x580EX, 1x430EX - Canon G12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ni$mo350
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,011 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
Sep 16, 2010 09:39 |  #14

poloman wrote in post #10917849 (external link)
I would like to see a little more difference between the left and right. A 1:2 ratio works well for a shot like this. Some light meters will calculate the ratio for you.

I'll be completely honest when I say I have no clue what you're talking about as far as ratio's. I'm planning ot pick up light meter here soon. I'm assuming you mean that I should run half power on the left compared to the right?

vk2gwk wrote in post #10918896 (external link)
I think the light is pretty good. Was this a bare flash or did you use a diffuser. The more diffused the light the less problems you have with hot spots.

Thanks, they were all fired through a 43" Westcott white satin umbrella. Left was about 10' high and right was about 7'.

Krapo wrote in post #10918994 (external link)
I like #4 best because of the separation effect that the flash provides.

Thank you! Not sure what I did different in that but I'll pull the exif and find out!

SJPHoto wrote in post #10919038 (external link)
it looks a little fuzzy. what is your aperture? when using flash, try getting away from wide open. Shoot around f/5.6 or something. The color on the first 3 are WAY too red. I like #4 the best. U can easily PS out that glare.

These were all shot at f/5 which I should've stopped down to f/8. I'm still getting used to this new lens (17-40L). I'll be sure to remember that next time though thanks! As for the color, I'm partially color blind (red/orange, green/brown, and blue/purple) so a lot of my portraits come out a bit on the red side. I can go back and lower the reds a bit and ses how that looks.

Thanks again everyone!


-Chris-Website (external link)|| (external link)Facebook (external link)|| My Flickr (external link)|| Follow me!!! 500px (external link) || (external link) 5D mkii || 35L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS MKII || My bank account hates you all :cry:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Sep 16, 2010 09:54 |  #15

Regarding light ratios. 1:2 or the inverse would be the amount of light hitting the subject is twice as much from one light as from the other. It isn't as simple as setting one at half power because of distance and modifiers. You can get darn close with a tape and the law of inverse squares and the power levels. The reason I like to use ratios is that I have found certain ratios to work best in certain situations. Because the light meter can calculate them for me, I can quickly set up and get very close to the effect that I want.


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,349 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Did I balance the light ok?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2765 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.