Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 17 Sep 2010 (Friday) 12:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Aurora on the Rocks

 
ArcticShooter
Goldmember
Avatar
1,828 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Arctic Norway (Tromsø)
     
Sep 17, 2010 12:22 |  #1

Some fantastic light this evening this was taken. Jupiter to the right.
Removed some telephone lines and poles just below Jupiter
I am running out of ideas of foreground so I tried this.
The rocks are lit with a dimmed down led light.
To much light on the rocks?

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


I just noticed the ripples in the image. Something when wrong in PP, since it's not in the original CR2 file :(

Helge
Summer is great :)

My gearMy (external link)Flickr  (external link) (external link)G+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkerr
Goldmember
Avatar
3,042 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA.
     
Sep 17, 2010 12:47 |  #2

For some reason the Aurora doesn't look natural in this picture. I'm seeing what looks like posterization when I view it on my monitor. It also looks as though you used a high ISO and there is a lot of noise.

What ISO and Shutter Speed did you use for this image, and what kind of post processing did you do?

And, No I don't think there is too much light on the foreground rocks. Some people might even light them up a little more. Using a strobe or flash rather than a dim light might work better. Strobe/flash the rocks at the end of your exposure. Doing that can give your picture more of a 3D look casting a shadow onto the background or the night sky, Like this image >> http://www.astronomy.c​om …spx?c=pod&id=18​6&aid=8349 (external link)


Tim Kerr
Money Talks, But all I hear mine saying is, Goodbye!
F1, try it you'll like it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ArcticShooter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,828 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Arctic Norway (Tromsø)
     
Sep 17, 2010 14:11 |  #3

tkerr wrote in post #10927454 (external link)
For some reason the Aurora doesn't look natural in this picture. I'm seeing what looks like posterization when I view it on my monitor. It also looks as though you used a high ISO and there is a lot of noise.

What ISO and Shutter Speed did you use for this image, and what kind of post processing did you do?

And, No I don't think there is too much light on the foreground rocks. Some people might even light them up a little more. Using a strobe or flash rather than a dim light might work better. Strobe/flash the rocks at the end of your exposure. Doing that can give your picture more of a 3D look casting a shadow onto the background or the night sky, Like this image >> http://www.astronomy.c​om …spx?c=pod&id=18​6&aid=8349 (external link)

I didn't do much PP except sharpening and exposure to +0.35 and reducing the size for web.
Shot at ISO 1250 for 20s at f/4.5
I think it is the clouds that gives the look. This aurora was not moving at all. It was almost invisible to the eye.
I am not so sure that a flash will do this any good, I can try it next time. I think it will be to much on the bright side even if I reduce the power to 1/4

Here is the raw file as is


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Helge
Summer is great :)

My gearMy (external link)Flickr  (external link) (external link)G+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mullski
Member
61 posts
Joined Aug 2010
     
Sep 21, 2010 14:14 |  #4

jealous i cant see this in person




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,375 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Aurora on the Rocks
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1491 guests, 188 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.