Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 17 Sep 2010 (Friday) 12:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Discussion regarding LLC Registration

 
css7493
Senior Member
Avatar
360 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Sep 17, 2010 12:25 |  #1

I have been registered as a DBA for a couple of years, and am making the move to register as an LLC. One thing I read is that there are some scenarios where the LLC registration will not limit the liability of the it's members. Some obvious ones are defamation, and general unlawful action against the opposing party.

Does anyone have any specific examples in our field (wedding photography and otherwise) that would fall past the LLC and land the liabilities on the member(s) of the corp?


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,370 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1375
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Sep 17, 2010 12:31 |  #2

css7493 wrote in post #10927312 (external link)
I have been registered as a DBA for a couple of years, and am making the move to register as an LLC. One thing I read is that there are some scenarios where the LLC registration will not limit the liability of the it's members. Some obvious ones are defamation, and general unlawful action against the opposing party.

Does anyone have any specific examples in our field (wedding photography and otherwise) that would fall past the LLC and land the liabilities on the member(s) of the corp?

You would really need information specific to your state--preferrably from a lawyer. The laws on LLCs are utterly state-driven, and any resulting case law within each will vary enormously.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Sep 17, 2010 13:03 |  #3

Yeah, it's all state driven. Regardless, I did an LLC for a few reasons, it was very cheap, it was very easy, and though it may not provide lock-tight protection under every circumstance it offers an awful lot given what's required to set one up.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
css7493
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
360 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Sep 17, 2010 13:13 as a reply to  @ Peacefield's post |  #4

That is all stuff that I had guessed. My wife's uncle is a J.P., he actually married us, I will see if he knows anything more specific.


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tracknut
Goldmember
Avatar
1,740 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Folsom, California
     
Sep 17, 2010 14:00 |  #5

I'm not a lawyer, but,

To my understanding the most normal "pierce the veil" scenario is around the assets of the corp. Let's say you take on a large project that very clearly should be covered by liability insurance. Let's say you don't have liability insurance and something goes wrong. Standing up in court and stating "I had no liability insurance, but I do have an LLC which is worth $1.25, and you may have it" is going to get your LLC tossed in the trash and you personally would be added as the defendant in the case. In other words, your corp must have reasonable ability to sustain the claim.

Again, I'm not a lawyer.

Dave


Performance/sport dog photographer (external link)
Facebook (external link)
"Always available to shoot your dog"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Sep 17, 2010 17:38 |  #6

Likewise, I'm not a lawyer, but I'd state it slightly differently. An LLC will help to shelter your assets UNLESS you were negligent. Not having sufficient insurance (along with a bunch of other things) could be regarded as negligent.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tracknut
Goldmember
Avatar
1,740 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Folsom, California
     
Sep 17, 2010 17:57 |  #7

You've said it much better than I... probably one reason I'm not a lawyer!

Dave


Performance/sport dog photographer (external link)
Facebook (external link)
"Always available to shoot your dog"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
css7493
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
360 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Sep 17, 2010 19:07 as a reply to  @ tracknut's post |  #8

That was exactly what I understood but could not figure out how to articulate myself. Negligence: an LLC will not protect you against stupidity, carelessness, and all the like. However if I upheld my end of a written agreement but a client were to claim otherwise, they win, however I am held only to what my company is worth.

Like tracknut . . . I am in no way shape or form a lawyer.


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,370 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1375
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Sep 17, 2010 19:17 |  #9

css7493 wrote in post #10929367 (external link)
That was exactly what I understood but could not figure out how to articulate myself. Negligence: an LLC will not protect you against stupidity, carelessness, and all the like. However if I upheld my end of a written agreement but a client were to claim otherwise, they win, however I am held only to what my company is worth.

Like tracknut . . . I am in no way shape or form a lawyer.

One of the reasons you have to check this out with a lawyer in your own state is because states differ greatly in how aggressively they rule on such things. In one state, it might be hardly an issue, in another they hang you out to dry. My state is so litigation happy that it's the #1 choice of venue for interstate class action suits.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Sep 18, 2010 06:51 |  #10

css7493 wrote in post #10929367 (external link)
Like tracknut . . . I am in no way shape or form a lawyer.

I always like to remind people; I am not a lawyer. I'm a photographer . . . I take pictures. ;)


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,391 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Discussion regarding LLC Registration
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Sandro Bisotti
1751 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.