Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 19 Sep 2010 (Sunday) 14:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 70-210 f/4?

 
trekgod3
Member
Avatar
166 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2009
     
Sep 19, 2010 14:49 |  #1

Anyone have any experience with this lens? I was looking for something with a little more reach than my 28-135 without breaking the bank. I found this review and it looks promising, even though it's a 20+ year old lens. The one I am looking at if going for $95 shipped.


1dx mark ii, 6d mark ii, Canon 24-70f2.8L ,Canon 70-200f2.8 IS iiL ,Canon 24-105 f4 L, Canon 100-300 f5.6L, Tamron 150-600, Canon 2x extender iii, Speedlite 580ex, Speedlite 430ex , Speedlite 270ex

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Sep 19, 2010 15:29 |  #2

I know one of our members, FrostBytePhoto, has one that he really likes...but I don't have any first hand knowledge of it.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stuperfox
Goldmember
Avatar
1,951 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 217
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Eugene, OR
     
Sep 19, 2010 15:47 |  #3

Optically is one still a strong performer compaired to the more modern 70-200mm F4L non IS.

AF motor is a little slow, but not bad at all. They normally go for around $200 used and for the money, are really worth it.

Nick


"I work from awkwardness. By that I mean I don't arrange things. If I stand in front of something, instead of arranging it, I arrange myself" -Diane Arbus
EOS R6 MK II Gripped | EOS R6 | 24mm F1.4 | 35mm F1.8 IS | 50mm F1.8 | 135mm F2L | 15-35mm F2.8L IS | 24-70mm F2.8 II | 70-200mm F2.8L IS | 150-600mm F5-6.3 G2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Sep 19, 2010 15:47 |  #4

why not sell your 28-135mm, and pick up a 55-250IS instead...

i thought i remember reading that the f3.5-f4.5 version is better than the constant f4...


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
racing-guy
Member
145 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Sep 19, 2010 15:51 |  #5

I had one of these for a while and was quite happy with it. It was finally put aside when I was able to afford a 70-200 F2.8. Assuming the example you are thinking of buying is in good shape it will be $95 well spent.


Equipment: Canon 7D & 50D, Canon 70-200 F2.8, Sigma 120-400, Tamron 17-50 F2.8, Canon 50mm 1.8, 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ Deep
Goldmember
Avatar
1,915 posts
Gallery: 95 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 965
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Upstate NY
     
Sep 19, 2010 15:53 |  #6

Wasn't impressed with mine - soft at all apertures/focal lengths. It may have been a bad copy.


mikedeep.com (external link) - rocket launch photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Airiq
Member
49 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, California, USA
     
Sep 19, 2010 16:32 |  #7

I borrowed one from my uncle a few years ago and used it for a couple weeks.
Ok at most focal lengths, a bit soft on the longer end. AF was slow, but ok outside. I wouldn't use it for fast sports though, but probably ok some applications.

The way the zoom works, you will have to deal with lens creep as you're walking around.

Here are a couple samples i liked from it. I think Exif should still intact, a couple more ore here: http://www.flickr.com …371433120/with/​443249184/ (external link)

1.

IMAGE: http://farm1.static.flickr.com/205/443249190_eeed9a1ac7_m.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/airiq/443249190​/  (external link)
2007Mar_SF_EC_002 (external link) by Airiq (external link), on Flickr

2.
IMAGE: http://farm1.static.flickr.com/168/443249184_b250bc56c5_m.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/airiq/443249184​/  (external link)
2007Mar_SF_EC_001 (external link) by Airiq (external link), on Flickr

Eric :cool: 7D · 24-105 f4L · Tamron 17-50 f2.8 · Full Gear List · My flick (external link)r (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
trekgod3
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
166 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2009
     
Sep 19, 2010 19:20 as a reply to  @ Airiq's post |  #8

Thanks for the replies


1dx mark ii, 6d mark ii, Canon 24-70f2.8L ,Canon 70-200f2.8 IS iiL ,Canon 24-105 f4 L, Canon 100-300 f5.6L, Tamron 150-600, Canon 2x extender iii, Speedlite 580ex, Speedlite 430ex , Speedlite 270ex

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rivalpc
Hatchling
Avatar
1 post
Joined Sep 2010
     
Sep 20, 2010 02:48 |  #9

I still have one that carried over from my film days that i play around with. The lens is/was a good performing lens Optics wise, zoom speed* and subtle focus change is moderatly fast. Bad part is slow on inital focus, noisy its, not smooth feeling. Remember this is Canons first ventures into the telephoto lens.
I'll be honest here the lens isnt light compared to modern ones, but it is rugged and holds its own for performace of the glass. zooming out is a breeze with the sliding Body type but she aint so great in the weight or speedy AF. Macro is pretty good but isnt something i would do with it regularly, thats what i have the Sigma 105.

hope this helps.
Sam




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,826 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Canon 70-210 f/4?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1064 guests, 100 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.