Now this looks very intersting, not just for macro but for portraits (alternative to 135L).
http://www.dpreview.com …09/10092118sigma150os.asp
dengar Senior Member 987 posts Joined Mar 2005 More info | Sep 21, 2010 05:23 | #1 Now this looks very intersting, not just for macro but for portraits (alternative to 135L).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TweakMDS Goldmember ![]() 2,242 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Netherlands More info | Sep 21, 2010 06:36 | #2 Very promising since the 150mm macro has been the lens of choice for many serious macro photographers. It's only shortcomings for none-macro work - slow AF and lack of IS when you compare it to using something like a 70-200 2.8 IS or 100L - seem to have been fixed now. Some of my lenses focus beyond infinity...!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bob_r Goldmember More info | Sep 21, 2010 06:47 | #3 The AF on the original wasn't that slow if you limited the focal length range and I never found the lack of IS a problem. Here's a shot taken with the older 150 on a 30D. Canon 7D, 5D, 35L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135L, 200L, 10-22, 17-55, 70-300, 100-400L, 500D, 580EX(2).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TweakMDS Goldmember ![]() 2,242 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Netherlands More info | Sep 21, 2010 06:54 | #4 bob_r wrote in post #10948201 ![]() The AF on the original wasn't that slow if you limited the focal length range and I never found the lack of IS a problem. Here's a shot taken with the older 150 on a 30D. Well, IS is far from a must on action scenes like you posted, since your shutterspeed has to be far beyond the minimums for handholding anyway. I don't really miss it often on my 100mm macro, but there are many times where I would really like to be able to handhold at speeds of 1/30 - 1/60th, which isn't really an option. Some of my lenses focus beyond infinity...!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RaZe42 Senior Member ![]() 518 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Finland More info | Sep 21, 2010 09:30 | #5 Ouchie... I recently bought the 180mm/3.5... Now I'll go cry in the corner Gear: Canon 5D Mk II | Olympus 21/3.5 | Zeiss Distagon 35/2 | Sigma 50/1.4 ASPH | Samyang 85/1.4 ASPH | Canon 100/2.8 L Macro
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shakyhand Member ![]() 241 posts Joined Dec 2006 More info | Sep 21, 2010 09:51 | #6 I have tried the sp90, siggy 150mm and siggy 180mm... all AF are slow but only at 1:1 macro work... 7D, 450D, EF17-40L, EF70-200/2.8L IS, 580EX, 550EX,..... Benro C-427 CF Tripod, Markin M10 Ballhead;
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Supersignet Senior Member 504 posts Joined Jan 2008 More info | Sep 21, 2010 10:10 | #7 Another Lens I might just have to add to the bag... Loved my old 150 Macro on my Nikon, but miss it a lot now that I have the 5D II.... Canon 5Dii, Sigma 24mm f1.8, Sigma 50mm f1.4, Sigma 85mm f1.4, Sigma 24-70 f2.8 EX Macro, Sigma 150mm f2.8 Macro, Canon 135 f2L, Zenitar 16mm f2.8 fish eye (on the way)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bob_r Goldmember More info | Sep 21, 2010 11:22 | #8 TweakMDS wrote in post #10948221 ![]() As for AF speed, I'm going by reputation here, but how would you say your 150 macro compares to the 135L and 200L (2.8 I assume)? Even with the focus limiter, I can't imagine it being anywhere close actually... The AF speed is probably a little slower than the 135 and 200, but those are two of the fastest focusing lenses I've tried. It's speed is probably closer to the 100-400 (with the range limiter set), which is plenty fast for this type of action shot. Canon 7D, 5D, 35L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135L, 200L, 10-22, 17-55, 70-300, 100-400L, 500D, 580EX(2).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop ![]() 9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Sep 21, 2010 12:25 | #9 TweakMDS wrote in post #10948221 ![]() As for AF speed, I'm going by reputation here, but how would you say your 150 macro compares to the 135L and 200L (2.8 I assume)? Having owned all three lenses, the 135 and 200 are noticeably faster to focus, but the 150 is no slouch. "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
push pins Senior Member ![]() 586 posts Likes: 4 Joined Oct 2008 More info | Sep 21, 2010 12:31 | #10 Finally! I will swap this with my non os as soon as it gets released.. One of Sigmas best lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CountryBoy "Tired of Goldmember label" ![]() 5,168 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Okie More info | Sep 21, 2010 12:33 | #11 TweakMDS wrote in post #10948221 ![]() Well, IS is far from a must on action scenes like you posted, since your shutterspeed has to be far beyond the minimums for handholding anyway. I don't really miss it often on my 100mm macro, but there are many times where I would really like to be able to handhold at speeds of 1/30 - 1/60th, which isn't really an option. As for AF speed, I'm going by reputation here, but how would you say your 150 macro compares to the 135L and 200L (2.8 I assume)? Even with the focus limiter, I can't imagine it being anywhere close actually... Compared to those lens the 100mm macro is rather slow also Hi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
midget Senior Member ![]() 511 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2007 Location: NY More info | Sep 21, 2010 12:48 | #12 more excited about this 120-300 OS! though given sigma's recent aggressive pricing, it will not be within my range. 40d + 50mm f1.8 MK I + my feet.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CountryBoy "Tired of Goldmember label" ![]() 5,168 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Okie More info | Sep 21, 2010 12:54 | #13 midget wrote in post #10950073 ![]() more excited about this 120-300 OS! though given sigma's recent aggressive pricing, it will not be within my range. Yes , I agree . We just need the 100-300mm f/4 to have OS added to it Hi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CountryBoy "Tired of Goldmember label" ![]() 5,168 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Okie More info | Sep 21, 2010 13:20 | #14 So I wonder when this lens will show up . In about a year ? Hi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 21, 2010 14:25 | #15 Hopefully not that long away - considering that sigma have already cleared that market area by removing the 180mm macro and the fact that canon and nikon both have stabalized macro lenses on the market right now. I think that sigma realises they need to keep a foot in the door and get this onto the market as soon as possible - otherwise they risk losing far to much sales position to the other 100mm macro lenses. Tools of the trade: Canon 400D, Canon 7D, Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L M2, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS, Canon MPE 65mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro, Tamron 24-70mm f2.4, Sigma 70mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 8-16mm f4.5-5.6, Raynox DCR 250, loads of teleconverters and a flashy thingy too
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is rickldewitt 1059 guests, 173 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |