Just ran into a new term while lens shopping online.
Some seem to have this distinction in the description.
What is a "Normal" lens?
Thanks
Jim
wickiup Member 66 posts Joined Oct 2005 More info | Sep 22, 2010 00:13 | #1 Just ran into a new term while lens shopping online.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
afviper Member 179 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Ellensburg, WA More info | Sep 22, 2010 00:24 | #2 A normal lens usually refers to a 50mm lens. Although more accurately it would be 50mm on a full frame and 30mm on a 1.6x body. 30D, 300D, Tokina 12-24mm, Tamron 28-75mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8, 100mm F2.0, Sigma 70-300mm APO macro, Tokina 400mm F5.6, CZ Jenna 135mm f3.5, 18-55mm,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
egordon99 Cream of the Crop 10,247 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Philly 'burbs More info | Generally a "normal" lens has a focal length equal to the diagonal of the sensor/film.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Sep 22, 2010 07:19 | #4 afviper wrote in post #10954025 Here is a quote from wikipedia: "In photography and cinematography a normal lens is a lens that reproduces perspective that generally looks "natural" to a human observer under normal viewing conditions.... Whoever wrote that piece for Wikipedia doesn't understand that a lens' focal length has nothing to do with perspective. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 22, 2010 10:57 | #5 While Skip is correct that definition is difficult to visualize in reality...and in the end the result is that at NORMAL viewing distances (What is NORMAL?) the perspective within the FRAMED IMAGE (relationship of foreground to background) APPEARS to be PROPORTIONALLY the SAME as the scene when viewed without any lens/camera. My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks Guys-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xarqi Cream of the Crop 10,435 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand More info | SkipD wrote in post #10955264 Whoever wrote that piece for Wikipedia doesn't understand that a lens' focal length has nothing to do with perspective. Hey - that's the beauty of Wikipedia! If you don't like it, change it!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1739 guests, 171 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||