MysticalPhoto Member 128 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Springfield, MA More info | Sep 22, 2010 11:42 | #1 Mystical Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
du8die Member 65 posts Joined Nov 2008 Location: S/E Wisconsin More info | Sep 22, 2010 12:26 | #2 Why isn't she looking at the camera? Despite the high cost of living, it remains popular.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Knockout05 Senior Member 625 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Gwinnett County, GA (USA) More info | Sep 22, 2010 12:30 | #3 I think its just your monitor but I can see where youre talking about and they dont seem blown to me. Definitely dont seem grey either. But maybe its my monitor flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thran Senior Member 580 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Chino Hills, California More info | Sep 22, 2010 14:16 | #4 She should look at the camera. 1Dx / 5Dmkii x4 / 5Dc x 2 / Canon R6 / Canon 135L / Canon 35Lii / Canon 85Lii / Canon 24-70iiL / Canon 45mm TSE/ Canon 430 EXII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scobols Goldmember More info | Sep 22, 2010 14:19 | #5 I'd like to see more emphasis on her and less on the horses. Agree with having her look at the camera, too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
urfastimfaster Goldmember 2,529 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2008 Location: san antonio More info | Sep 22, 2010 20:32 | #6 None of them are in focus..well maybe the horse in the 1st image..and her leg in the 2nd one. Canon 7d w grip canon 50d w grip, canon 40d w grip Nikon d300,430exII 580exII (2) wescotts strobes(2) pocket wizards TT5's,(2) 50 1.2 70-200 Is 2.8,Canon 24-70,2.8 50;1.4.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HYBEagle Senior Member 301 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | Sep 22, 2010 23:54 | #7 Why do you call this "Senior Portraits" ? She looks junior to me, or is my understanding of the term wrong ? 20D | 17-40 f/4 | 50 f/1.4 | 100 f/2.8 IS | 200 f/2.8 | 400 f/5.6
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Knockout05 Senior Member 625 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Gwinnett County, GA (USA) More info | Sep 22, 2010 23:58 | #8 HYBEagle wrote in post #10960674 Why do you call this "Senior Portraits" ? She looks junior to me, or is my understanding of the term wrong ? Ive seen seniors that look like freshmen and freshmen that look like seniors. She very well could be a senior. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ni$mo350 Cream of the Crop 6,011 posts Likes: 14 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Portland, OR More info | Sep 23, 2010 00:05 | #9 Knockout05 wrote in post #10960691 Ive seen seniors that look like freshmen and freshmen that look like seniors. She very well could be a senior. I'm assuming they meant they don't understand our version of senior pics. He was expecting someone who is older -Chris-Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HYBEagle Senior Member 301 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | Sep 23, 2010 00:17 | #10 My bad, I just looked up "Senior portraits" on google. Not being a native North American I took the literal meaning of the term: portraits of senior citizen. 20D | 17-40 f/4 | 50 f/1.4 | 100 f/2.8 IS | 200 f/2.8 | 400 f/5.6
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Knockout05 Senior Member 625 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Gwinnett County, GA (USA) More info | Sep 23, 2010 00:36 | #11 Oops. I see. Well she is senior in the school sense flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1downfall Goldmember 4,059 posts Likes: 5 Joined Nov 2007 Location: virginia beach, va More info | Sep 23, 2010 08:28 | #12 urfastimfaster wrote in post #10959561 None of them are in focus..well maybe the horse in the 1st image..and her leg in the 2nd one. I agree here. #1 looks like a lot of dodging burning going on in the face to lower the blown highlights. Bill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wqueiros Member 32 posts Joined Mar 2010 Location: GTA - Canada More info | Sep 23, 2010 09:27 | #13 Same here! Less horse, more model , and more eye contact. Pay attention to composition and horizon lines. I would love to see #3 with the subject on the left side of the frame. Thanks for sharing. Amateur - Canon 50D, Tamron 28-75mm, 50mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TuanTime Senior Member 759 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2009 More info | I agree with everyone here, not enough emphasis on the model, blown highlights, a bit grey, most are either out of focus or seem to have motion blur, and I'm not sure if it's your lens or pp technique but there is a lot of chromatic aberration on the pictures with white horse reigns. I'm also on a laptop monitor so I could be wrong about that last bit. I do like the theme though and think you should give it another session.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RDKirk Adorama says I'm "packed." More info | Sep 23, 2010 10:24 | #15 How long was that lens for the seated poses? There seems to be a great deal of telephoto perspective compression that makes her legs appear much stubbier than they probably are. In the future, you might want to arrange the subject's in such poses so that they don't point bluntly into the lens (same with hands). TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ahmed0essam 1739 guests, 176 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||