Wait, is the Sigma 30mm not a wide angle right? lol
Sep 30, 2010 09:53 | #31 Wait, is the Sigma 30mm not a wide angle right? lol I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
guyzer09 Goldmember 1,207 posts Likes: 61 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Salem,OR More info | Sep 30, 2010 09:55 | #32 No it will give you a 50mm FOV in terms of FF on your xsi which is considered a standard/normal FOV
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 30, 2010 09:59 | #33 Then the Canon 28mm 1.8 would be the same effect technically even though it's a "wide angle?" I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 30, 2010 10:00 | #34 Vixen89 wrote in post #11007541 I just looked this one up..you got me drooling now. LOL I keep talking myself out of the 24L II. At 1/4 the price, the Sigma holds its own very well. And as this is a hobby for me, I can't justify the other 3/4. Canon EOS M6 Mark II - EOS R5
LOG IN TO REPLY |
theextremist04 Goldmember 1,224 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: Kansas City More info | Sep 30, 2010 10:10 | #35 Vixen89 wrote in post #11007591 Then the Canon 28mm 1.8 would be the same effect technically even though it's a "wide angle?" The 28 1.8 works on full frame cameras as well, and it would be a wide angle lens on a FF camera. Personally I would go for the Sigma 30, it was made for crop bodies and will really complement the Sig 50 (which is an amazing lens, good choice there.) -Michael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 30, 2010 10:26 | #36 randy98mtu wrote in post #11007598 I keep talking myself out of the 24L II. At 1/4 the price, the Sigma holds its own very well. And as this is a hobby for me, I can't justify the other 3/4. I debated the 28 and the 30 for a long time. I'm very happy with my Sigma, but I never had to send it in. Is it a hit or miss kinda thing with Sigma to have no issues with the lens? theextremist04 wrote in post #11007685 The 28 1.8 works on full frame cameras as well, and it would be a wide angle lens on a FF camera. Personally I would go for the Sigma 30, it was made for crop bodies and will really complement the Sig 50 (which is an amazing lens, good choice there.) Thanks! I feel like I was choosing the right thing because I'm really not going to upgrade my camera body so I wanna aim towards more crop body lenses vs. FF because I wanna be able to use it for it's worth. I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 30, 2010 10:51 | #37 Vixen89 wrote in post #11007813 Is it a hit or miss kinda thing with Sigma to have no issues with the lens? There are a lot of reports of focusing issues with Sigma lenses. But seems to be just as many with no problems. Just get the lens and use it and if you have problems, you send it to Sigma and it sounds like they usually make it right. The same is true of the Sigma 50. Canon EOS M6 Mark II - EOS R5
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 30, 2010 10:58 | #38 Well now, at least I know what I'm gonna be aiming for in the end. Sigma 50mm 1.4 and the Sigma 30mm 1.4...let's see how my bank likes me now. LOL I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1082 guests, 151 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||