Canon 60D Users, Unite!

macroshooter1970 wrote in post #11894592
We try to have fun around here. If you're talking about what I think you are then yes, PS. I did one of my niece, it's was funny.

I know there is a thread on here for it but i cant find it

macroshooter1970 wrote in post #11894598
I never had it, but that kit lens really seems to have nice IQ.

Yes it does

http://www.dpreview.co​m …_3p5-5p6_is_c16/page3.asp

The main reason I sold mine was that I was finding it was just too short for my type of shooting, so got the 15-85 - and excellent replacement - but the kit lens, build quality aside, is very good.

vinmunoz wrote in post #11894683
Class 6 is good enough but if you want more speed, take the Transcend Class 10. Sandisk SD cards are good but very expensive. transcend brand is not bad.

hope this helps. I just bought 32GB Transcend Class 10 and work like a charm.

vinz

Its an excellent point - I too often look to Sandisc prices for their premium cards - but really I should look to Sandisk main competitors because its true - like Canon L lenses - they are too expensive - but the good news is that Sandisk main competitors ARE quality cards and likely Equal to Sandisk premium cards... I would personally do well to investigate fast quality premium Sandisk alternatives like Lexar & Transcend and save like 35-40% or more....

Immaculens wrote in post #11894802

Its an excellent point - I too often look to Sandisc prices for their premium cards - but really I should look to Sandisk main competitors because its true - like Canon L lenses - they are too expensive - but the good news is that Sandisk main competitors ARE quality cards and likely Equal to Sandisk premium cards... I would personally do well to investigate fast quality premium Sandisk alternatives like Lexar & Transcend and save like 35-40% or more....

Try the PNY proffessional 8GB class 10 cards. I bought one at WalMart for 29.00, and have had no problems with it. I too have always used SanDisk extreame class 10 cards, but I figured I'd give the PNY a try, and alls been good

JLPhotography82 wrote in post #11894746
I know there is a thread on here for it but i cant find it

Any program that will do layers will do it for you, of which Photoshop is just the best and most expensive. Paintshop Photo Pro, older freebie versions of Paint Shop Pro (often came bundled with printers and scanners), old versions of MacroMedia Fireworks... these are the ones I've used, but I'm sure there are others. Fireworks and Photoshop have the best selection tools. Paintshop Pro is okay, and is inexpensive. I've just shifted to Photoshop because it doesn't crash and has better noise removal. GEt teh program, and then figure out how to use layers!

Probably the most "Photoshop Like" Free program out there - and it of course uses Layers

http://www.filehippo.c​om/download_paint.net/

JLPhotography82 wrote in post #11893490
hey guys i need help, what is it called when you take multiple pics of yourself in the same pic?

With a film camera it would be called multiple exposures. Which is what I think you were asking....or maybe not?

Like others have said any editing program that will do layers will let you create the same effect.

Now I have a question for the collective......

Is there any way to do multiple exposures in camera with a digital camera? I don't think so but maybe someone has found a way to do it so I figured I would ask.

I did have one thought and that would be to put the shutter in 'bulb' mode and uncover, cover, then uncover the lens (repeat as needed) until you get what you were after.

Anyway, just tossing the idea out there,

Jon...

you guys are great!

Jon_PDX wrote in post #11895089
With a film camera it would be called multiple exposures. Which is what I think you were asking....or maybe not?

Like others have said any editing program that will do layers will let you create the same effect.

Now I have a question for the collective......

Is there any way to do multiple exposures in camera with a digital camera? I don't think so but maybe someone has found a way to do it so I figured I would ask.

I did have one thought and that would be to put the shutter in 'bulb' mode and uncover, cover, then uncover the lens (repeat as needed) until you get what you were after.


Anyway, just tossing the idea out there,

Jon...

The other way I can think of is painting with light. You can just make a really long exposure time and use a bright light source to expose different things one at a time -either at night or with a lot of ND filters. Then you can move them out of the frame and wait for the exposure to finish.

so i go to pull out my tripod and someone broke it and neatly placed it back in my closet!

Guys, I'm excited! I Won't give all details now, but I'm making myself a contract! (Don't worry, it's not for a wedding)

I'll let you know soon

Rivest wrote in post #11895354
Guys, I'm excited! I Won't give all details now, but I'm making myself a contract! (Don't worry, it's not for a wedding)

I'll let you know soon

Just great! Keep us in suspense!! You know how much stress it is around here. You gone all day, and the other top four haveing to handle all the thread business. Now you do this to us. You should be ashamed of yourself!!

lost my tripod Rivest holding out on details.............im going to bed to cry myself to sleep

macroshooter1970 wrote in post #11895395
Spill the beans David.

I just had to take a tranqulizer! Maybe I need a 12 step program for the stress here!

Press your lips closed David until details are firm... THEN Spill The Details Please so we can be happy for you!