Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 29 Sep 2010 (Wednesday) 00:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

24-70 vs 17-55 on 7D

 
beerba
Mostly Lurking
19 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Norway
     
Sep 29, 2010 00:36 |  #1

I am going to buy a 7D, but i dont know whitch lens to buy with it.
The 24-70/2.8L USM or 17-55/2.8 IS USM.

Whitch lens would be the best lens on the 7D?


7D / 24-70 f:2.8L USM / EF300 f:4L IS USM / 16-35 f:2.8L II USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stir ­ Fry ­ A ­ Lot
Senior Member
679 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Berkeley, Ca
     
Sep 29, 2010 00:51 |  #2

Brb. I'm gonna search the other countless threads on this and get back to you.

Edit: Go with the 17-55


Flickr (external link)
5D3 | 5Dc | 7D | Tok 16-28 | 24-105 | 17-55 | 70-200 f4 IS | Pancake 40 | Sigma 50 | 85 1.8 | Yongnuo 565EX | Demb Flash Bracket | DiffuseIt Bounce Card | Manfrotto 535 CF Tripod | 2x Yongnuo YN560s | 2x PBL Softbox Umbrellas | CyberSync Triggers | Epson R3000 | A very understanding wife

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HyperYagami
Goldmember
2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
     
Sep 29, 2010 00:52 |  #3

17-55/2.8 IS USM.



5D3 and a few lens
es.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SiaoP
Goldmember
Avatar
1,406 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Bay Area
     
Sep 29, 2010 00:53 |  #4

The 24mm won't be very wide on a 7D. It'll be like 40mm. If that doesn't bother you I would get the 24-70 for its better build quality. The 17-55 is known to suck in dust. It has no weather sealing. I have no internal dust in my 24-70 so far and it's been through some rainy sandy days.

The image quality between the two are similar, some say the 17-55 is sharper but I can't tell the difference. I suggest 24-70 because you might upgrade to a non-crop later on, but if you have sights on staying crop the 17-55 would be the better choice since I like to have the focal length option at 17 to 24mm.


My Flickr (external link) | Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jmantyger
Senior Member
Avatar
296 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2007
Location: Prattville, AL USA
     
Sep 29, 2010 01:03 |  #5

beerba wrote in post #10998502 (external link)
I am going to buy a 7D, but i dont know whitch lens to buy with it.
The 24-70/2.8L USM or 15-55/2.8 IS USM.

Whitch lens would be the best lens on the 7D?

I had both. I sold the brick. 17-55 is an amazing lens.


5D MKIII, 16-35L f/4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L II f/2.8 IS, 100-400L II, 430 EX III
Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alainvd
Member
Avatar
200 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Brussels
     
Sep 29, 2010 01:56 |  #6

17-55. Don't care about the red ring and go for the best EF-S zoom.


5D² - 7D - 17-55 2.8 IS - 90 Macro - 35L - 85LII - 135L
Photographe de mariage en Belgique (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shutterkicks
Member
145 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Sep 29, 2010 02:05 |  #7

I'd go for the brick. Can't stand plastic at that price. It'll be a wise investment if you're planning to go FF someday.


My Gear | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beerba
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
19 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Norway
     
Sep 29, 2010 03:27 as a reply to  @ shutterkicks's post |  #8

Hmmm, ok. Thanx all.:D

That was what i sort of expected, this or that....is the best...

I think i will go for the 24-70,,,,,maybee:cool:

Thanx all


7D / 24-70 f:2.8L USM / EF300 f:4L IS USM / 16-35 f:2.8L II USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MP4/8
Senior Member
Avatar
689 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Mississauga ON, Canada
     
Sep 29, 2010 06:16 as a reply to  @ beerba's post |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

O Boy.

Another 24-70 / 17-55 thread...haha. :D


OP, I think you'll find a lot of people who own either lens, will tell you they're happy with their choice.
But there's no clear concensus.

There's a poll on this very same lens selection on another thread, and at times it was as high as 93% in favour of the 17-55.

But it's gone up and down.
I don't know where it's at currently.

I think the best thing to do, is either rent the lenses, or go to your local camera shop and see if they'll let you mount them on your camera and snap some pics in the store, so you can go view them at home, and deliberate.

I know my camera shop would let me do this, no problem.

.


Canon T2i ** EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 ** EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS ** EF 50mm f/1.8 II ** EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro ** Lensbaby ** Canon S5 IS P/S camera
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." : Albert Einstein

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rjx
Goldmember
Avatar
2,670 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Santa Clara, California
     
Sep 29, 2010 06:26 |  #10

The quality is great for both lenses. Just pick the one with the focal range YOU like better. Simple.


"It doesn't matter what camera you have if your photography has nothing worthwhile to say"
“Photos are everywhere. You just have to know how to look.”

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beerba
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
19 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Norway
     
Sep 29, 2010 07:49 |  #11

rjx wrote in post #10999436 (external link)
The quality is great for both lenses. Just pick the one with the focal range YOU like better. Simple.

Think i'l do that.:D

Then it's the 24-70 then:lol:


7D / 24-70 f:2.8L USM / EF300 f:4L IS USM / 16-35 f:2.8L II USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eric
Goldmember
Avatar
1,253 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: MA
     
Sep 29, 2010 07:53 |  #12

I played with the 17-55 before I bought my 24-70, just couldn't get over the cheep feel of the lens and the numerous "dust" comments. I'm happy with the 24-70 on my 7D


Eric Darlington Photography (external link)
flickr (external link) / [URL="[URL]http://eric​darlington.500px.com/"​]500px / [URL="[URL]http://www.​facebook.com/EricDarli​ngtonPhotography"]Face​book
[URL="[URL]http://phot​ography-on-the.net/forum/showpost​.php?p=8612297&postcou​nt=1945"]Tools

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Sep 29, 2010 08:08 |  #13

PhotoByED wrote in post #10999693 (external link)
I'm happy with the 24-70 on my 7D

of course you may not realize the Canon 17-55IS and other EF-S type lens like the Tamron 17-50 are sharper than the 24-70 on a crop model but as long as you're happy that's all that matters
http://www.photozone.d​e (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
darosk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,806 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
     
Sep 29, 2010 08:15 |  #14

Getting the brick just because it's an L? Some venture that the 1755 is superior to the brick in every way but build quality, and a sliver of red.

I'd personally pocket the $300-400 difference.


Tumblr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Youtube (external link)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blschaefer1
Member
154 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Sep 29, 2010 10:13 as a reply to  @ darosk's post |  #15

17-55. The best all around lens I have owned, period.


5D3, 24-70 f/4 IS, 35 f/2 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

42,601 views & 0 likes for this thread, 56 members have posted to it.
24-70 vs 17-55 on 7D
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1245 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.