No... your lens is fine... if you don't use it don't spent a ton of money on something you don't use... plus, your 70-200 will retain value fine.
themadman Cream of the Crop  18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Sep 29, 2010 10:36 | #16 No... your lens is fine... if you don't use it don't spent a ton of money on something you don't use... plus, your 70-200 will retain value fine. Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JWright Planes, trains and ham radio...  18,399 posts Likes: 35 Joined Dec 2004 More info | SkipD wrote in post #11000506  The original 70-200 f/2.8L IS will never be less of a lens than it was when it was the only one you could buy. I have absolutely no intention to replace mine. Same here... John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1328 guests, 155 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
