Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 30 Sep 2010 (Thursday) 18:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Focusing Help @ Distance

 
IainUK
Senior Member
Avatar
432 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 5
Joined Dec 2005
Location: U.K.
     
Sep 30, 2010 18:19 |  #1

I'm obviously doing something wrong but I'm not sure what and this image is a classic example. I thought that if I used f20 / f22 and focused mid way the DOF would mean that the whole image was in focus. However as this image shows (f20) the foreground is good but the lighthouse is really OOF. It's not the lens as this happens with pretty much any lens I use. So I am pretty sure it's me! OR is it that I'm just asking to much of the pixels?

Any advice greatly received.. thanks.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


"No one ever grew by being measured...."
EOS5D / 5d MKII
580 EX II
24-70mm f2.8 L
70-200mm f2.8 L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraBuff
Goldmember
Avatar
2,862 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Illinois
     
Sep 30, 2010 18:37 |  #2

I would say it's most likely from diffraction. Just do a google and you can read up on it. A shot like that would probably be better at f11 or f16 at most. As far as focus I usually focus about 1/3 of the way into the seen but if you want to be exact just google hyperfocal distance. Oh, by the way that is a nice shot; I love the composition and that sky is awesome. Did you use any gnd's on that shot.


Sony A7r, Sony 16-35 f4, Canon 1d3, Canon 70-200 f4L, Sigma 150-600 contemporary, G1X, Lee filter holder and gnd's, Singh-Ray reverse gnd
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Don1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,741 posts
Gallery: 176 photos
Likes: 3269
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Sep 30, 2010 18:43 |  #3

I wouldn't expect much better from this shot. For one thing the lighthouse is very far in the distance and is also backlighted. Even if you were focused on the lighthouse it likely wouldn't show much improvement.


Don
Canon EOS R5, Canon 5D Mark III, Canon 7D Mark II, Canon EF 70-200mm F4 L IS, Canon EF 100-400 L IS II, EF 24-105mm, EF 16-35mm f/4 L IS USM, Canon EF 300mm f/4 L IS USM
See my photos on My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LarryD
Goldmember
Avatar
1,029 posts
Gallery: 171 photos
Likes: 1365
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Mojave Desert
     
Sep 30, 2010 22:37 as a reply to  @ Don1's post |  #4

I'm not sure that I follow your focusing technique fully..

I'm guessing that you want to use hyper-focal techniques, but your description isn't exactly that..

With new lenses that are not inscribed as the old ones were, it isn't quite as easy as it used to be.. But, you still don't just "focus in mid-way and have the whole image in focus". Hyper-focal focusing is based on the the idea that depth of field typically extends 2/3 behind the point focused on and 1/3 in front, and varies based on aperture. With older lenses, you calculated your hyper-focal distance and the f-stop needed, then rotated the lens focus barrel so the infinity mark rested on that f number, and then everything from infinity back to the opposite inscribed f number would be in focus.. (or, of course, you focused on an object at your calculated distance) See, if you just focus halfway, or what seems like halfway, then you may have things in focus at a hyper-focal distance (2/3 behind the focus point and 1/3 in front) but you don't actually have that calculated distance in front of you, and so your "in focus far point" may be short of that distant object - your lighthouse. - You didn't focus on a point out far enough to capture it.

So, ask yourself... am I focusing so that my infinity mark is further around the lens barrel than it might be if it was inscribed (for DOF) similar to the old ones ? For it to be accurate, then your infinity mark HAS to be at a value that does not exceed where the value of the (non-inscribed) f-stop is. If you actually calculated your hyperfocas distance, then that distance would be the number that is at the lens center mark when you have focused.

Here is my 2 cents.. 1. I think that you are enlarging the distant subject (pixel peeping?) so much that you see it at it's worst. and, 2. I believe that you are concerning yourself with getting the foreground in focus and not really nailing the distance objects (You need to bring the infinity mark back in towards the lens center line a bit more and to within the "range" of your chosen f-stop) ..:D


.... Got some cameras; got some glass ..... I just need one more of each.....:rolleyes:

Some Snap-Shots (external link)
http://500px.com/Larry​D (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IainUK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
432 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 5
Joined Dec 2005
Location: U.K.
     
Oct 01, 2010 05:43 |  #5

I love the composition and that sky is awesome. Did you use any gnd's on that shot.

That's very kind of you thanks - I was definately using a CPL. The thing is I took heaps of images with idfferent ISO and f stops (not to mention bracketing!) for some I used a .3 stop grad but I honestly can't remember for this one!

it's most likely from diffraction

So this is a new one fore me and reading about it could explain a lot - thanks for the tip it's great to learn something new / something to have to think about when trying to get a good shot! :rolleyes::D

I'm guessing that you want to use hyper-focal techniques

Ah yes this thing called hyper-focal calculations......I've been behaving a bit like an ostrich in respect to hyer focal distance. I know that I have to learn about it to improve but every time I start reading about it my eyes glaze over.....If there's an idiots guide someone could point me to I'd be grateful.

Thanks again for all your help guys...


"No one ever grew by being measured...."
EOS5D / 5d MKII
580 EX II
24-70mm f2.8 L
70-200mm f2.8 L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Oct 01, 2010 06:54 as a reply to  @ IainUK's post |  #6

I doubt that you have any diffraction issues...f/20 and f/22 work just fine on the FF sensor, especially at the hyperfocal distance. Also, hyperfocal distance techniques will not make distant images pin-sharp...it only ensures that the elements of the image will be in the "acceptable range of sharpness" from front to back. As far as focusing 1/3 in and hoping for the best, this general rule-of-thumb is a bit misleading since it really only applies to a specific focal length. Going to 100% pixel peeping on distant objects will drive you crazy, especially considering that prints are equivalent to a 25% screen view.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IainUK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
432 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 5
Joined Dec 2005
Location: U.K.
     
Oct 01, 2010 19:26 |  #7

pixel peeping on distant objects will drive you crazy

It is :-)

especially considering that prints are equivalent to a 25% screen view

Are you saying that this wouldn't be as noticeable on a print? I've seen loads of your work on here - how do you manage to get such great DOF where it all seems in focus? Thanks


"No one ever grew by being measured...."
EOS5D / 5d MKII
580 EX II
24-70mm f2.8 L
70-200mm f2.8 L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ETS
Senior Member
Avatar
755 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 666
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Cocoa, Florida
     
Oct 01, 2010 20:28 as a reply to  @ IainUK's post |  #8

It's late and I'm tired so maybe I'm missing something, but my exif program shows this photo was shot at f3.0.


Fuji X-T2,5D MKII,Rebel XTi
17-40L, 70-200 F4L, 400mm F5.6L, 100mm F2.8L, Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art
580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IainUK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
432 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 5
Joined Dec 2005
Location: U.K.
     
Oct 02, 2010 07:35 |  #9

but my exif program shows this photo was shot at f3.0.

Not a chance...:-)


"No one ever grew by being measured...."
EOS5D / 5d MKII
580 EX II
24-70mm f2.8 L
70-200mm f2.8 L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,833 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Focusing Help @ Distance
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1767 guests, 147 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.