Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 01 Oct 2010 (Friday) 01:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Having focus issues w/ kit lens

 
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Oct 01, 2010 23:24 |  #16

-2 EC...too much. The IS sure could have created the blur.


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TomCross13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
803 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Central Florida
     
Oct 01, 2010 23:30 |  #17

poloman wrote in post #11018468 (external link)
-2 EC...too much. The IS sure could have created the blur.

I'm going to try the same shoot again with a velvet backdrop to see what happens. I'll use everyones tips also. Then after that I'm sure I'll need more tips! Haha


I shoot with an iPhone 4S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Oct 01, 2010 23:33 |  #18

A note on long exposures...
You are more likely to have trouble on moderate length than long exposures. This is true because shutter vibration or tapping a tripod leg or whatever bad event is a smaller percentage of a longer exposure. So, I would much rather take a 15 second exposure than a 3 second one.


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TomCross13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
803 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Central Florida
     
Oct 01, 2010 23:58 |  #19

poloman wrote in post #11018499 (external link)
A note on long exposures...
You are more likely to have trouble on moderate length than long exposures. This is true because shutter vibration or tapping a tripod leg or whatever bad event is a smaller percentage of a longer exposure. So, I would much rather take a 15 second exposure than a 3 second one.

That's something I've never heard of. Is it common? Or just with the cheap ones? Why does vibrate more with less time?

edit

I get it, makes sense. thanks!


I shoot with an iPhone 4S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Oct 02, 2010 08:59 |  #20

You can avoid practically all vibration with mirror lock-up and a remote shutter release. A good sturdy tripod helps too. Just thought it might be useful info for you.
How about lighting them subtly from below? Maybe a red and or green gel? They aren't creepy if you can't see them. Makes me wonder if your monitor is calibrated because I almost can't see these.


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TomCross13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
803 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Central Florida
     
Oct 02, 2010 13:15 |  #21

poloman wrote in post #11019824 (external link)
You can avoid practically all vibration with mirror lock-up and a remote shutter release. A good sturdy tripod helps too. Just thought it might be useful info for you.
How about lighting them subtly from below? Maybe a red and or green gel? They aren't creepy if you can't see them. Makes me wonder if your monitor is calibrated because I almost can't see these.

I use a tripod and remote, I had is on so that probably caused the slight blur. But I didn't think about monitor settings. I have mine as dark as it can get because my parrots sleep behind me at night when I'm PP and the light shines in their eyes. I'll change my monitor settings too. I don't have the table top or anything to change the light around yet but that's a good suggestion. Thanks again


I shoot with an iPhone 4S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TomCross13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
803 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Central Florida
     
Oct 02, 2010 16:28 |  #22

Im shopping for a new tripod and my budgets is around $125-$150. A friend was letting me borrow his and asked for it back. Any suggestions?

I'm going to get a gorilla pod for taking low shots and having fun, unless there is a tripod within my price range that reaches the floor.


I shoot with an iPhone 4S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HeaTransfer
Senior Member
554 posts
Joined Mar 2010
     
Oct 02, 2010 16:40 |  #23

Save your money and get a good tripod. I find that I save more money my spending well, once, rather than spending multiple times piecemeal. There is a forum section that discusses tripods and one can glean appropriate recommendations from there.

Finally, you stated that you shot at -2 EC for a "creepier" look. Have you considered exposing properly, and then adjusting the exposure in post? It's a bit more work but you'll get better results that way.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TomCross13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
803 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Central Florida
     
Oct 02, 2010 16:52 |  #24

HeaTransfer wrote in post #11021588 (external link)
Save your money and get a good tripod. I find that I save more money my spending well, once, rather than spending multiple times piecemeal. There is a forum section that discusses tripods and one can glean appropriate recommendations from there.

Finally, you stated that you shot at -2 EC for a "creepier" look. Have you considered exposing properly, and then adjusting the exposure in post? It's a bit more work but you'll get better results that way.

I'll check on tripods, If I can find one that reaches the ground for around $200 I'm set. I'm not going to be mobile with it, just need it for portrait type stuff (high and low). I don't have a lot of room that why I was considering the g pod.

When I take pictures I try to get them as close as possible to what I want. If I take it properly exposed I don't know if that shot is going to be the one I want. I dont have a lot of experience with pp software but I know how to adjust the general settings. I'll try exposing properly and see what I can come up with. Thanks for the info


I shoot with an iPhone 4S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Oct 02, 2010 20:15 |  #25

You can just prop you camera creatively until you can get what you want.


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TomCross13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
803 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Central Florida
     
Oct 03, 2010 03:54 |  #26

Here are the new photo's (no PP, just croping). I took them around 3am before bed and I was so happy & amazed that it only took 40 photo's to get what I was looking for. And you were right about ISO, EC, IS, and well...everything- so thank you all very much.

I've added the pseudio (table top studio) setup so you can see how everything was set up for the shot. I could use some advice for lighting and reflectors. I was using a pet light from petsmart because that's the most versatile light I have for now. I just taped a piece of printer paper to it as a softbox - genius, i know ;-)a I had a 13W(60W) CFL bulb in it.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE



IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE



IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE



IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

I shoot with an iPhone 4S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gregr2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,468 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 202
Joined Apr 2010
Location: West Melbourne, Fl
     
Oct 03, 2010 08:50 as a reply to  @ TomCross13's post |  #27

Much better. The light on the top of the skeleton head is still pretty strong as you can see some hot spots. You may want to diffuse you main light above a little more but it's a nice improvement.


Flickr (external link)
Sony A6500

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Oct 03, 2010 10:50 |  #28

Much better! If you move the light closer to the subject, the size of the light in relation to the size of your subject will be greater and it will appear softer. You will also get more wrap around. The harshness may be good for what your doing. Just wanted to share that tidbit with you.


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,937 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Having focus issues w/ kit lens
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2681 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.