Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
Thread started 01 Oct 2010 (Friday) 13:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

So... who says a G10 can't do bokeh?

 
alan_potter
wireless groping system
Avatar
2,408 posts
Gallery: 164 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 658
Joined May 2005
Location: Falkirk, Scotland
     
Oct 01, 2010 13:14 |  #1

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4110/5042392934_8e6425ab41_o.jpg

All the bokeh you need? And no, they were way too cheap to rustle up an air bridge...

regards,
/alan

Falkirk, Scotland.
Project 365 Blog (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
audiosteve
Member
146 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Colorado USA
     
Oct 01, 2010 13:48 |  #2

@alan_potter. Was macro focus on here ? It looks like it could have been. Yes you can get some bokeh in macro mode. It actually call this more 'out of focus background' than bokeh. Try getting bokeh in std focus mode. There is little to be had there.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alan_potter
THREAD ­ STARTER
wireless groping system
Avatar
2,408 posts
Gallery: 164 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 658
Joined May 2005
Location: Falkirk, Scotland
     
Oct 01, 2010 15:27 |  #3

You're exactly right... It's just a bit of fun... the G10 is a fine camera, but there are some things it's better for than others. Bokeh is one of the others...

regards,
/alan


Falkirk, Scotland.
Project 365 Blog (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Glyno
Member
Avatar
157 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Chester, UK
     
Oct 03, 2010 03:48 |  #4

audiosteve wrote in post #11015567 (external link)
...It actually call this more 'out of focus background' than bokeh.

isn't it the same thing? :confused:



my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Erik_L
Goldmember
3,160 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Minnesota
     
Oct 03, 2010 04:28 |  #5

bokeh, IIRC, is/are the little rings of specular highlights you get:

IMAGE: http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af339/smrndmguy/People/Resize10001of1-2-3.jpg

50 f/1.4 shot wide open on a 7D. Notice that all of the lights that would normally be in focus, are out of focus and appear as a circle? Bring your G10 in the car at night, zoom in as far as you can and manually set the focus to as near as possible. Notice that street lights will become OOF on your screen and should look like little colorful dots/circles.

Also, to answer your question in your title... Physics. Physics says so :)

Canon EOS 1D III
Manfrotto 190X Pro B w/324RC2 "Action Head" | Canon 580EX II
Sigma 20 f/1.8 | Canon 35 f/1.4 L | Sigma 50 f/1.4 | Sigma 85 f/1.4 | Canon 135 f/2 L
Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JimAskew
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,148 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 1151
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Springfield, VA
     
Oct 03, 2010 07:29 as a reply to  @ Erik_L's post |  #6

Alan, bokeh or not, I love this photo! Well done :)


Here is a good article on bokeh with some great examples:
http://www.instantshif​t.com …les-of-bokeh-photography/ (external link)


Jim -- I keep the Leica D-Lux 7 in the Glove Box just in case!
7D, G5X, 10-22MM EF-S, 17-55MM f/2.8 EF-S IS, 24-105MM f/4 EF L, Leica D-Lux 7

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jan ­ Jasinski
Goldmember
Avatar
3,063 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 803
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Canada
     
Oct 03, 2010 07:31 |  #7

Awesome photo! Such high quality!!!!!! I like the fact a Easyjet A319 is there :P
I would like to get the G11, but with 5x zoom, no thanks, I need telephoto. :(


My Website (external link) | Instagram (external link)
Canon R5 | R6 II | RF 100-500L | RF 24-105L | RF 14-35L | RF 85 f/2 | RF 24 f/1.8
RF 2x | 500L II | 11-24L | 1.4x/2x III | Σ 105 f/1.4 | Σ 14 f/1.8 | Σ 24 f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeFairbanks
Cream of the Crop
6,428 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2009
     
Oct 03, 2010 08:10 |  #8

Frank Costanza lives in Del Bokeh Vista.

My Italian grandfather once said, "Ouch, I think I bokeh me arm when I fell."

My kid collects Bokehmon trading cards.


Thank you. bw!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
arg245
Senior Member
Avatar
827 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: South Florida
     
Oct 03, 2010 09:21 |  #9

:rolleyes: You're ALL wrong. "bokeh" is when you're trying to say "OK" with a stuffed up nose. :cool:


---------------
Andy Garcia
Google+ (external link) | Zenfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
arg245
Senior Member
Avatar
827 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: South Florida
     
Oct 03, 2010 09:28 |  #10

And yes, you can get bokeh out of a G series. Just not as easily as with an SLR........

G3, no macro mode:

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4086/5010470436_b481d8602b_z.jpg

---------------
Andy Garcia
Google+ (external link) | Zenfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
czeglin
Senior Member
Avatar
560 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Rockville, MD
     
Oct 03, 2010 09:35 |  #11

Glyno wrote in post #11024064 (external link)
isn't it the same thing? :confused:

bokeh refers to the quality of the blur, not the quantity


Flickr (external link) | Gear & Feedback | DIY Padded Insert

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Glyno
Member
Avatar
157 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Chester, UK
     
Oct 03, 2010 09:54 |  #12

so, who decides?

personally, I think the quality of the blur in the first photo is pretty good



my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yapo
Member
Avatar
142 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Oct 03, 2010 09:57 as a reply to  @ czeglin's post |  #13

Yeah on my G10 i find i can get some bokeh/background blur either by using macro or zooming in while getting in close to the subject eg someones face.

I'm guessing this would work even better with G9's longer focal length.


m4/3: Olympus E-PL2 | Nokton 25 f/0.95
Film: Voigtlander Bessa R3M | Nokton 40 f/1.4 SC
DSLR: Canon 5D MKII | EF 50 f/1.4 | EF 85 f/1.8 | Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 | Rokinon 35 f/1.4 | EF 17-40 f/4L | EF 70-200 f/4L IS | 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GordonSBuck
Senior Member
914 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Louisiana
     
Oct 03, 2010 17:19 |  #14

czeglin, you're right about the use of the word "bokeh" but might as well give up that debate -- I have. I no longer use the "bokeh" word and now simply talk about background blur.

I have the G9 and did made a short study and experiment of my attempts to get background blur when the main subject is portrait sized; it just doesn't work out. Part of the problem is that the G series maximum apertures change with focal length. See my trials at http://lightdescriptio​n.blogspot.com/search/​label/dof (external link)


Gordon
http://lightdescriptio​n.blogspot.com (external link)
My 10 Best Photos: http://hornerbuck.smug​mug.com …187_MdCXA#56343​6691_UdXpt (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ryanshoots
Senior Member
344 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2010
     
Oct 03, 2010 23:40 |  #15

Glyno wrote in post #11024807 (external link)
so, who decides?

John Persimons
240 W Galpin
Westminster, CT 12345

He's judged bokeh from blur for years.

:lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,242 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
So... who says a G10 can't do bokeh?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1519 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.