SnapShot Photos wrote in post #11022321
I thought this one was cool because he was hit in the arm and the ball got stuck in the crease of his sleeve:
That is cool, but because everything in the image is so sharp, and the paint ball is so small, nobody's ever going to notice without you telling them.
There is a little too much depth of field in most of these pictures, and all of them but the pan-blur shot are more or less the same picture. I would be more interested in a shot from behind the guy, so you can see his perspective on the battlefield, which would be a shot where deep DOF would come in handy, which stock lenses are good at.
That being said I am a fan of the pan-blur shot, to me it's the most successful. It has the kind of action I would expect to see in a Paintball picture, and it shows a little more of the battlefield, to give it more context.
The PP is alright to me, but there is a weird green-ish tinge to the flesh, which is hard to see because of the size of the water mark. They photos might be a touch over-saturated, but that is more an issue of taste.
I realize everybody else has commented on the watermark, and I did critique the images as it if it weren't there, but it really does look unprofessional, and a little bit tacky.