Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 03 Oct 2010 (Sunday) 14:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Use of Flash in Shade

 
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Oct 03, 2010 14:12 |  #1

Sometimes I'll use off-camera flash in shade just to add a little depth to the image, but that's NOT what I'm asking about here.

I've had some instances where I was shooting in harsh full sun, found the shade of a tree and did portraits there. The problem was that the area in the background was so bright that it overpowers the subject in the photo. If it's not possible to move to an angle so as to avoid that bright background, how do you handle this? Do you maybe meter on the area in full sun and use flash on the subject to bring them up to the same brightness? Or do you just shoot the scene and it is what it is?


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
david ­ lee
Senior Member
Avatar
586 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Kent, England
     
Oct 03, 2010 14:22 |  #2

Depends if its a nice background and whether I want to have any part of it in my photo.
But assuming you want to have BG in Expose for a mid bright area and then underexpose by about 2 stops. Use OCF set to ETTL to fill in foreground


davidleeimages.co.uk (external link)
pbase (external link)
gear

"My fingers hurt from taking too many photos" D.A.Lee LBIPP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Valjoy
Senior Member
459 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Australia
     
Oct 03, 2010 17:00 |  #3

Very good question...I am also interested to see how others handle this situations.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EL_PIC
Goldmember
Avatar
2,028 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Austin Texas - Lucca Italy
     
Oct 03, 2010 17:41 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

Valjoy wrote in post #11026467 (external link)
Very good question...I am also interested to see how others handle this situations.

Use PS to mask the front image from back then adjust the background only
or - delete the background and sub in another shot of it at normal exposure.


EL_PIC - RIT BS Photo '78 - Photomask Engineering Mgr
Canon DSLR - Nikon SLR - Phase One 60MP MFDSLR
http://www.Photo-Image-Creations.com (external link)
http://www.musecube.co​m/el_pic/ (external link)
http://www.facebook.co​m/PhotoImageCreations (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bansheercr
Member
Avatar
146 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Upstate NY
     
Oct 03, 2010 19:33 as a reply to  @ EL_PIC's post |  #5

I've exposed for the background then let the flash fill in the subject with good results. Don't see how you can have the best of both worlds naturally. Perhaps catching some sun with a reflector would help in the shade other wise ps editing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PMCphotography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Tasmania, Australia.
     
Oct 03, 2010 20:29 |  #6

Either expose for the background and fill flash for the foreground, or use a tripod and take 2 separate exposures, one for the couple and one for the background, then combine in PhotoShop. Is also do one without flash- sometimes the blowout background makes a nice image.


Twitter (external link)
Hobart Wedding Photography (external link)
I have some camera stuff. Here it is.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
css7493
Senior Member
Avatar
360 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Oct 03, 2010 23:59 as a reply to  @ PMCphotography's post |  #7

I shoot with 1-2 580s OCF almost all the time, this exact situation. Set the flash at an angle with respect to shadowfall on any tree trunk or wall they are near. I oftentimes use OCF even out of the shade to better underexpose the sky and get better colors from it.


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 04, 2010 00:04 |  #8

I wouldn't put people in the shade if the background is bright, i'd put them in shade which has a solid background, like a bush.

If there's nowhere like that i'd keep people in the sun, back to the sun, and use off camera flash to light them.

If it was really, really hot, i'd put them in the shade and use off camera flash to try to make them as bright as the background.

You can always blow out the background, of course, but that reduces contrast.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Oct 04, 2010 07:24 |  #9

tim wrote in post #11028827 (external link)
If there's nowhere like that i'd keep people in the sun, back to the sun, and use off camera flash to light them.

You can always blow out the background, of course, but that reduces contrast.

Yeah, I'm not a fan of blown out background for group shots for this reason. And simply bringing them into the sun and using fill flash is a good and obvious solution that just wasn't coming to me; thanks.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Acute ­ Exposure
Senior Member
940 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Tampa
     
Oct 04, 2010 07:26 |  #10

I use a reflector to accomplish this. It is nearly as bright as the sunlit background but it is much more diffuse as I use a large one and only the white side.


Website (Updated Recently) (external link)
Flickr (Constantly Updated) (external link)
Canon 1Ds3 - 7D - 24-105mm F4 L IS - 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II (Always attached) - 50mm 1.8 (Never gets used) - 1.4x MKii - 580EX II - 430EX II - Lots of other gadgets

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
viet
Goldmember
1,019 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Oct 05, 2010 03:03 |  #11

if you can't avoid it, bring them back out in the sun behind their back and fill in with flash. If you balance the faces with the backlit sun in the shade, it'll look obviously flash was used since the shaded area immediately behind them will still not lit enough to balance things out. Hard to explain, but the gis of it is you will get different & high contrast light ratios, and your subjects will look "flashed".

Bringing them back out to the sun, you only have to worry about their faces and not the surrounding area.

edit: I should read more before answering. Tim beat me to it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 05, 2010 03:05 |  #12

OneFastt996 wrote in post #11030245 (external link)
I use a reflector to accomplish this. It is nearly as bright as the sunlit background but it is much more diffuse as I use a large one and only the white side.

Reflectors make people squint. Flash, with a short duration, is nicer for people though less bright. And you can't easily light more than about 3 people with a reflector.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Acute ­ Exposure
Senior Member
940 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Tampa
     
Oct 05, 2010 03:50 |  #13

tim wrote in post #11036437 (external link)
Reflectors make people squint. Flash, with a short duration, is nicer for people though less bright. And you can't easily light more than about 3 people with a reflector.

That is somewhat true. The white side off at an angle with a fill flash to fill the darker side eliminates squint and allows you to shoot for the bright background. I have found this very effective.


Website (Updated Recently) (external link)
Flickr (Constantly Updated) (external link)
Canon 1Ds3 - 7D - 24-105mm F4 L IS - 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II (Always attached) - 50mm 1.8 (Never gets used) - 1.4x MKii - 580EX II - 430EX II - Lots of other gadgets

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Oct 05, 2010 09:29 |  #14

I'm with Tim. Even white reflectors make people squint. People have called it a "torture device" during shoots... which is one of the many reasons I stopped using reflectors. Otherwise, in a technical sense, they are quite effective. I now only use them as scrims.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shockey
Goldmember
1,187 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Boise Idaho
     
Oct 05, 2010 09:41 |  #15

Several different ways.
Shoot them without flash and let the background go, or light flash to get better color and let the background go.
I would shoot them in the sun, and expose for the face, save the background or let it go...either way works...depends on what you are going for.


That silly rule about not shooting people in the sun is more for beginners. Once you learn to shoot in the sun, just do it. I would rather shoot in the sun than in that green shady light, I call that light "green death" haha.....especially if you are not using a flash.


___________
Boise Portrait Photographer
www.alloutdoor.smugmug​.com (external link)
www.aoboudoirboise.smu​gmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,937 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it.
Use of Flash in Shade
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1036 guests, 176 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.