Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 04 Oct 2010 (Monday) 01:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best way to preserve quality on Flickr?

 
chris ­ jones
Member
196 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: CA
     
Oct 04, 2010 01:16 |  #1

Everytime I upload a photo to Flickr, I am disappointed with the loss of quality and sharpness. The photos lose their pop and look alot more drab.

When I am done processing my photo, I resize to something like 1200x800, set to Bicubic sharper, and then save as jpeg in highest quality. I have noticed that the 'Bicubic Sharper' setting helps reduce anti-aliasing, but I want my images to remain sharp.


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopher ­ Steven ­ b
Goldmember
Avatar
3,547 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
     
Oct 04, 2010 01:42 |  #2

Are you saving the images with sRGB embedded profiles ?



christopher steven b. - Ottawa Wedding Photographer

www.christopherstevenb​.com (external link)| Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris ­ jones
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
196 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: CA
     
Oct 04, 2010 02:01 |  #3

It appears that I am not. The photos are using Adobe RGB. How can I change this?


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris ­ jones
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
196 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: CA
     
Oct 04, 2010 02:31 |  #4

I tried saving it with sRGB and it had no impact on quality. It only changed the colors.. (I am doing more research on this and I'm starting to understand it)

I have been trying to get this photo to stay sharp when I upload it but Im not getting anywhere
http://www.flickr.com …049601295/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)

I tried converting to sRGB, reduction using Bicubic sharper to 1200x800 and 300dpi(up from 240), then saved as jpeg highest quality.. still not any better.


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Oct 04, 2010 02:40 |  #5

Chris, definitely convert to sRGB for Web use. Then, for a site like Flickr, I'd find out their maximum display size and just resize it to that size. So, for an image that you've posted there, right-click and get the properties, check out the size (it should show the resized size), and then when you do the Image/Image Size set those pixel dimensions. I am not a Flickr user, but there are a lot of people here who use Flickr with pretty good results.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 04, 2010 07:40 |  #6

Image looks okay here at 800x1200...

ppi is irrelevant for web posting.
definitely use sRGB for web.

You might want to sharpen after resize, or use an action that does this for you while resizing. (Manyk SRS for instance; Google will find it)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Acute ­ Exposure
Senior Member
940 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Tampa
     
Oct 04, 2010 07:42 |  #7

The biggest impact I saw in the quality was by sending it to flickr in lower dimensions and re-sharpening after the resize. It makes a huge improvement over sending them a huge image and then having their algorithms resize them.


Website (Updated Recently) (external link)
Flickr (Constantly Updated) (external link)
Canon 1Ds3 - 7D - 24-105mm F4 L IS - 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II (Always attached) - 50mm 1.8 (Never gets used) - 1.4x MKii - 580EX II - 430EX II - Lots of other gadgets

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Riveredger
Senior Member
670 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2010
Location: NJ
     
Oct 04, 2010 08:45 |  #8

OneFastt996 wrote in post #11030301 (external link)
The biggest impact I saw in the quality was by sending it to flickr in lower dimensions and re-sharpening after the resize. It makes a huge improvement over sending them a huge image and then having their algorithms resize them.

Do you mean that you resize, re-sharpen and then upload? Or, resize, upload and then resharpen in picnik?


Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Acute ­ Exposure
Senior Member
940 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Tampa
     
Oct 04, 2010 08:46 |  #9

Riveredger wrote in post #11030581 (external link)
Do you mean that you resize, re-sharpen and then upload? Or, resize, upload and then resharpen in picnik?

Option number one.


Website (Updated Recently) (external link)
Flickr (Constantly Updated) (external link)
Canon 1Ds3 - 7D - 24-105mm F4 L IS - 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II (Always attached) - 50mm 1.8 (Never gets used) - 1.4x MKii - 580EX II - 430EX II - Lots of other gadgets

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
monk3y
Totally Saturated
Avatar
46,207 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Cloud and Honey
     
Oct 04, 2010 08:59 |  #10

I found flickr to retain the sharpness of my photos... never had a problem with it. even if I upload original dimensions or resized. I can't see the difference


www.monk3y.com (external link) | My GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris ­ jones
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
196 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: CA
     
Oct 04, 2010 22:08 |  #11

Thanks for the help everyone! I have figured out the main reason; turns out my browser was 'zooming in' on each page causing the images to look dull. This is why the looked good in a file browser, but bad on the internet.

I also came across this great writeup on optimizing images for web use which really helped with my workflow
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=265690

Thanks again!


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris ­ jones
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
196 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: CA
     
Oct 04, 2010 22:32 |  #12

I thought I was done, but I just noticed something... I converted to sRGB using the photoshop 'convert to web use' but when I look at the exif on flickr, it still shows Adobe RGB 1998.. Im not sure what Im doing wrong here.


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gregr2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,468 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 202
Joined Apr 2010
Location: West Melbourne, Fl
     
Oct 05, 2010 06:53 |  #13

René Damkot wrote in post #11030290 (external link)
You might want to sharpen after resize, or use an action that does this for you while resizing. (Manyk SRS for instance; Google will find it)

I googled this and added the action to PS and it is AMAZING! All I can say is WOW, what an incredible job it does of sharpening. Thanks so much.


Flickr (external link)
Sony A6500

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
carshop
Goldmember
Avatar
1,846 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Oct 05, 2010 07:04 |  #14

Yes, thanks to Rene....I googled it too.
Works great.


ShawnSmugmug (external link)/Flickr (external link)/LikeMyFacebook (external link)
Canon 70D Gripped|
Canon 70-200 2.8 IS|Canon 24-105|Canon 18-135
Canon 580 EX II|Sigma 18-50 2.8
Canon 55-250|Sigma 17-35 2.8| 2 Pocket Wizard II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 05, 2010 12:16 |  #15

Glad to be of service guys :)

chris jones wrote in post #11035433 (external link)
I thought I was done, but I just noticed something... I converted to sRGB using the photoshop 'convert to web use' but when I look at the exif on flickr, it still shows Adobe RGB 1998.. Im not sure what Im doing wrong here.

Not sure either. Wrong exif viewer?:

IMAGE: http://img.skitch.com/20101005-ta5xuj12euga45yk4kf4fwhj8t.jpg

"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,809 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Best way to preserve quality on Flickr?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is RawBytes
1351 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.