Long exposure at sea

1.

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

I don't think there is one better than the other, but I prefer #2 due to the colour cast present. But it still looks underexposed.

You've got at least one dust bunnie and sea spray to clone.

Thank you for that, I have only noticed it now.

I appreciate your comment.

dche5390 wrote in post #11029988
I don't think there is one better than the other, but I prefer #2 due to the colour cast present. But it still looks underexposed.

You've got at least one dust bunnie and sea spray to clone.

I cloned away the dust spots and upped the brightness, I think this looks a lot better.

What filter were you using? The colour cast looks like what I get from my crapy hitech 10 stopper.

The water isn't misty enough, suggesting not quite long enough an exposure.

Hmm .. now #2 revised looks weird.

dche5390 wrote in post #11030067
Hmm .. now #2 revised looks weird.

Weird as in.... ? I used a cokin ND filter for this.

This is my first try with long exposure and also at this type of setting, just would like some grip on how to get this perfect.

Thank you.

Ok so no one else have anything to comment?

I still find them too dark. I also agree they need to be for longer duration to really have a dramatic effect on the water.

OneFastt996 wrote in post #11030503
I still find them too dark. I also agree they need to be for longer duration to really have a dramatic effect on the water.

I know what you are saying, I had this set at 30sec, but I think the water was maybe too stil for the effect I was after.

I am here to show the photos and for advice not for someone to say the same as the next poster, if you have knowledge of photography, share it with me.

Thank you anyways.

Albertonman wrote in post #11030546
I know what you are saying, I had this set at 30sec, but I think the water was maybe too stil for the effect I was after.

I am here to show the photos and for advice not for someone to say the same as the next poster, if you have knowledge of photography, share it with me.

Thank you anyways.

If multiple people don't tell you they share the same opinion how will you know it isn't just one persons critique? Also, most people start with 30 seconds as it's the longest you can go without switching to bulb. Bulb requires a remote trigger for these types of shots. Try 2 minutes and see what happens.

OneFastt996 wrote in post #11030592
If multiple people don't tell you they share the same opinion how will you know it isn't just one persons critique? Also, most people start with 30 seconds as it's the longest you can go without switching to bulb. Bulb requires a remote trigger for these types of shots. Try 2 minutes and see what happens.

I have a remote trigger will give it a go next time. Thank you again

I like #2 picture, with better color.

xpherion wrote in post #11032588
I like #2 picture, with better color.

Cheers

#2 as well, better colors and more detail.