Am I right in thinking the Lens Adapter LA-DC58K is the right mount for a Raynox rather than the Filter Adapter FA-DC58B?
Raynox DCR250![]()
racketman Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 04, 2010 12:08 | #1 Am I right in thinking the Lens Adapter LA-DC58K is the right mount for a Raynox rather than the Filter Adapter FA-DC58B? Toby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 04, 2010 16:28 | #2 ok answered my own question, Lensmate Adapter A and C are a better bet, aluminium against plastic and tighter fit. Toby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnBaker Senior Member 480 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Teignmouth, Devon, UK More info | Oct 07, 2010 12:21 | #3 Toby, both will work fine, what I have done with mine is remove the Raynox from its carrier, and then fitted a stepping down ring 58mm to 43mm and then fit the filter directly to the adaptor - there may be another ring in the mix, as I don’t think I could get one to go all the way down in a single step. The problem I found is that the squeeze adaptor which is fitted to the Raynox did not align perfectly with the lens. The size difference does not impact on the image at all. I have built up a set of achromatic close up filters, I do find that the DCR-250 is a bit too strong at +8 but great quality, my weapon of choice is the Sigma Achromatic +1.6 (which I have in 58mm), mid range I use a Konica Minolta CL49-200 +4 (which is 49mm). I picked the Minolta and Sigma up for very silly money (I think £1 for the Minolta and £10 for the Sigma), I would like the Canon 250D and 500D but I don’t think they would be any better than what I have and they do cost a lot of money new. John Baker
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 08, 2010 12:30 | #4 John Baker wrote in post #11052606 Toby, both will work fine, what I have done with mine is remove the Raynox from its carrier, and then fitted a stepping down ring 58mm to 43mm and then fit the filter directly to the adaptor - there may be another ring in the mix, as I don’t think I could get one to go all the way down in a single step. The problem I found is that the squeeze adaptor which is fitted to the Raynox did not align perfectly with the lens. The size difference does not impact on the image at all. I have built up a set of achromatic close up filters, I do find that the DCR-250 is a bit too strong at +8 but great quality, my weapon of choice is the Sigma Achromatic +1.6 (which I have in 58mm), mid range I use a Konica Minolta CL49-200 +4 (which is 49mm). I picked the Minolta and Sigma up for very silly money (I think £1 for the Minolta and £10 for the Sigma), I would like the Canon 250D and 500D but I don’t think they would be any better than what I have and they do cost a lot of money new. thanks for info. I'll see how I get on with Lensmate. I also have the Nikon 3T & 4T close up filters which have a 52mm thread. Toby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnBaker Senior Member 480 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Teignmouth, Devon, UK More info | Oct 08, 2010 15:05 | #5 racketman wrote in post #11058928 thanks for info. I'll see how I get on with Lensmate. I also have the Nikon 3T & 4T close up filters which have a 52mm thread. Those two have a really great reputation, from memory the 3T is a +1.5 and the 4T is +2.9 simple Lensmate a + b unit and a stepping down ring and you are in business. I also picked up a really cheap eBay special reversing ring, which allowed me to fit a “Nifty Fifty” 50mm f1.8 reversed on my adaptor tube. While it is very dark and very close, from reading I think it is about the equivalent of a +20 lens, DoF was miniscule but magnification was amazing. John Baker
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 08, 2010 18:19 | #6 i've only ordered lensmate A & C sections for use with Raynox. With a step down ring 58-52 I should be able to mount the Nikon close up lenses; it will vignette from wide 28mm, to about 40mm but I would only want to use it at max tele for macro anyway. Toby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnBaker Senior Member 480 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Teignmouth, Devon, UK More info | Oct 08, 2010 18:56 | #7 The real issue is that the lens will focus up close at the wide position, which can be fun for those wide-angle macro shots. Thought I would add some pics, to show what we are on about... Apologies if you have seen these before, but thought they would brighten up the post!!! Another
All the above were taken with an external EX flash, mounted off the camera and a big flash diffuser, works very well – basically it allows you to stop down and get a decent shutter speed - this is the camera fitted with the 49mm - Konica Minolta CL49-200 +4 John Baker
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 09, 2010 12:16 | #8 nice dragonfly and damsel shots; this guy has some fine G10 macros: Toby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnBaker Senior Member 480 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Teignmouth, Devon, UK More info | Oct 09, 2010 12:50 | #9 That is nice work, well presented... John Baker
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1244 guests, 122 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||