I really like the rays of light across the sands.
it's a hobby, no justification needed for anything. But I'm single so I can say that.
Mark0159 I say stupid things all the time More info | Jan 31, 2015 19:51 | #7126 I really like the rays of light across the sands. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kiwichris I forget how I didded that! More info | Feb 01, 2015 00:53 | #7127 Potisdad wrote in post #17408266 Nice evening at out Bethells recently. Do you think the flare spoils it? NO, the flare sort of softens the image and adds a sort of romantic feel, sometimes you see this in real life. Its a nice pic Panasonic Lumix G9 and some lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Potisdad Senior Member 670 posts Likes: 10 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Auckland NZ More info | Very nice Tony. Looks like a 4:3 ratio crop - kinda like medium format David
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Potisdad Senior Member 670 posts Likes: 10 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Auckland NZ More info | Thanks Chris, I don't mind the flare either, but it becomes much more noticable when zoomed in. I don't think it will stand up to printing at a large size. David
LOG IN TO REPLY |
weka2000 Is that a 300mm in your pocket? More info | Feb 01, 2015 20:55 | #7130 Photoshop is my friend
LOG IN TO REPLY |
akiwi Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 05, 2015 02:18 | #7131 weka2000 wrote in post #17409042 Photo time ..... woops spelt Whatipu wrong I could always justify gear ![]() Very nice.. except the spilling. Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark0159 I say stupid things all the time More info | Feb 06, 2015 00:06 | #7132 in case you lot haven't seen the news Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MarkVuleta Goldmember More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Mark Vuleta. (2 edits in all) | I don't need any more pixels than I have at present.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark0159 I say stupid things all the time More info | Feb 06, 2015 00:33 | #7134 yea the 6D is good for me. I don't see this camera as an upgrade. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MarkVuleta Goldmember More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Mark Vuleta. | Feb 06, 2015 00:40 | #7135 Mark0159 wrote in post #17417779 yea the 6D is good for me. I don't see this camera as an upgrade. that lens would be interesting to play with. it's dam big tho. I don't use my 17-40 that often so buying a 11-24 is a long way off. esp at that price
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark0159 I say stupid things all the time More info | Feb 06, 2015 00:46 | #7136 dam that's a big truck. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MarkVuleta Goldmember More info | Feb 06, 2015 00:49 | #7137 Yep, 16-35Mk2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark0159 I say stupid things all the time More info | Feb 06, 2015 00:56 | #7138 the problem with wide is that it's distortion at that wide. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MarkVuleta Goldmember More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Mark Vuleta. | Feb 06, 2015 01:03 | #7139 Wide angle distortion is certainly an issue. I'm going to have a decent go at re-shooting it, this was taken at a family gathering after a couple of beers.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
weka2000 Is that a 300mm in your pocket? More info | Feb 06, 2015 01:13 | #7140 Mark Vuleta wrote in post #17417756 landscapers?? Reasonably expensive. http://www.bhphotovideo.com …_ef_11_24mm_f_4l_usm.html 17mm is enough. It will hit same issue as Nikons 14-24 ........ filters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 613 guests, 136 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||