Check these out.....all portraits with the Sigmalux, most at f/2 or larger....
http://www.flickr.com …wef/tags/sigma50mmf14hsm/![]()
versedmb Goldmember 4,448 posts Likes: 4 Joined Apr 2006 More info | Oct 07, 2010 14:14 | #16 Check these out.....all portraits with the Sigmalux, most at f/2 or larger.... Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 07, 2010 16:29 | #17 Also, should I go ahead and get my copy of my lens or should I pay the $35 shipping fee back to Sigma from the camera store? >> I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
holland_patrick Senior Member 811 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Ct More info | Oct 07, 2010 17:00 | #18 How did you know these pictures were soft? the back of the camera?? or did you have a computer to pixilpeep? Rebel XT,1D Mark IIN
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 07, 2010 17:07 | #19 I kinda wanna grab the lens now and post pictures for you guys.. I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dieselbob57 Mostly Lurking 11 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: so. Oregon More info | go get the lens and try it on your body, every camera and every lens are a little bit different. Also you can't tell much about a picture by looking at the lcd, you need to load it on a pc. canon EOS 1D,50D,sigma 10-20,sigma 28-70 f2.8,sigma 50 macro, sigma 18-125os, tamron 100-300, kenko 1.5 teleplus
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 07, 2010 19:39 | #21 Well I grab the lens today and I'm gonna post up pictures shortly for ya'll. Let me know if I need to send this baby back to Sigma! I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tanglefoot47 Goldmember 2,413 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Tulalip WA about 40 miles north of Seattle More info | Oct 07, 2010 19:46 | #22 dadgummit wrote in post #11051862 I have tried 5 sigma 30mm's and cannot find one that is good. 2 came from adorama, one from tri-state camera and 2 from a local shop (got tired of paying for return shipping). None could consistantly focus at any distance. On the other hand I know sigma lenses work great on my camera I have the 10-20mm f4-5.6, and the 18-250 which are both percect. Heck the 18-250 was better hand held indoors with no flash than any of the 30mmm f1.4's Ive had. Before people start talking about razor thin focus I have had great luck with canon's nifty 50 and the 85 f1.8 wide open. Even though both are f1.8 instead of 1.4 with the longer focal length they have an even thinner DOF than the sigmalux. Just my 2 cents Love your forum name that was one of my grandmothers favorite sayings.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 07, 2010 20:08 | #23 f1.4 f1.6 f1.8 f3.2 + flash lol I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 07, 2010 20:18 | #24 |
Oct 07, 2010 20:18 | #25 I don't know ..now. lol I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shadowblade Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 07, 2010 20:31 | #26 If the point of focus was supposed to be on the Sigma text rather than the bag on the left in the first set of test shots, it appears to be front-focusing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 07, 2010 20:44 | #27 ..what is front focusing and is that bad? I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Project22a Senior Member 453 posts Joined Jul 2008 More info | Oct 07, 2010 20:55 | #28 what was your focus point B&W film shooter gone digital.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 07, 2010 21:31 | #29 It was supposed to be on the box on the first set; and then my friends face but I let the camera do the AF on it; now I'm gonna upload the photos where the focus point was just dead on center. f3.2 - same focus point f1.4 - center point on the address f2.2 - same center point I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robonrome Goldmember 2,746 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2008 Location: Australia More info | Oct 07, 2010 22:01 | #30 it's front focussing (slightly) at close distances. means the focus is occuring before (closer to you) than where you are focussing. rob - check my galleries at http://hardlightimages.zenfolio.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1117 guests, 150 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||