I feel sorry for the fuel maintenance folks. Conformals are the worse idea ever for the F-16.
I absolutely love the lighting on this shot
Oct 08, 2010 08:02 | #16 I feel sorry for the fuel maintenance folks. Conformals are the worse idea ever for the F-16. 5DIII|24-105L|100L|135L|70-200L|28-135|430EX II|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 08, 2010 09:20 | #17 lgunnz wrote in post #11057515 I feel sorry for the fuel maintenance folks. Conformals are the worse idea ever for the F-16. I absolutely love the lighting on this shot Honestly they haven't been an issue for our jets so far. I work on these things everyday they have other issues but fuel isn't the common one. Thanks for the compliment. -Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 08, 2010 18:03 | #18 SVTmaniac wrote in post #11057912 Honestly they haven't been an issue for our jets so far. I work on these things everyday they have other issues but fuel isn't the common one. Thanks for the compliment. It just seems like it adds an element to troubleshooting that the F-16 doesn't need, it being hard enough to troubleshoot. I've been working fuels on them for 10 years from block 30s to block 52s and they never seem to amaze me at the amount of things that can be wrong and still NOT be the problem 5DIII|24-105L|100L|135L|70-200L|28-135|430EX II|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 08, 2010 19:20 | #19 lgunnz wrote in post #11060526 It just seems like it adds an element to troubleshooting that the F-16 doesn't need, it being hard enough to troubleshoot. I've been working fuels on them for 10 years from block 30s to block 52s and they never seem to amaze me at the amount of things that can be wrong and still NOT be the problem I love them though, not looking forward to the phase out to F-22 and F-35.I've been a crew chief for 10 years now 6 on the A-10 and 4 on the F-16. I can't wait to get the F-35 personally -Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ryancr711 Member 96 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Clovis, NM More info | Oct 09, 2010 19:49 | #20 Wow, CFTs and 3 bags of gas. Maybe it's the angle or focal length, but those wing tanks look slightly larger than the 370s we fly around with. Nice capture though. -Ryan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 09, 2010 23:22 | #21 Yes they are 600 gallon tanks. -Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rouxeny Senior Member 250 posts Joined May 2008 More info | Oct 10, 2010 03:15 | #22 Great shot. I didn't know the F16 had conformal tanks. That that was limited to the F-15. Andrew Tan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
muppetdave Member 42 posts Joined Sep 2008 More info | Oct 10, 2010 03:53 | #23 cool photo with lovely lighting
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Desertraptor Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 10, 2010 06:23 | #24 Awesome shot Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
horse51 Goldmember 1,287 posts Joined Mar 2010 Location: Illinois More info | Oct 10, 2010 21:51 | #25 ok, that is a bad ass Viper !!!! Alan "horse51" Barbor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2944 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||